{"billNo":"1040525070200400","相關附件":[{"網址":"https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/download/agenda1/02/pdf/08/07/15/LCEWA01_080715_00008.pdf","名稱":"關係文書PDF"},{"網址":"https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/download/agenda1/02/word/08/07/15/LCEWA01_080715_00008.doc","名稱":"關係文書DOC"}],"議案流程":[{"會期":"08-07-15","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會","日期":["2015-06-05","2015-06-09"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-7-15"},{"會期":"08-07-15","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"退回程序委員會","日期":["2015-06-05","2015-06-09"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-7-15"},{"會期":"08-07-16","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會","日期":["2015-06-12","2015-06-15","2015-06-16"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-7-16"},{"會期":"08-07-16","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"退回程序委員會","日期":["2015-06-12","2015-06-15","2015-06-16"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-7-16"},{"會期":"08-08-02","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會","日期":["2015-09-18","2015-09-21","2015-09-22"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-2"},{"會期":"08-08-02","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"退回程序委員會","日期":["2015-09-18","2015-09-21","2015-09-22"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-2"},{"會期":"08-08-03","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會","日期":["2015-09-25","2015-09-29"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-3"},{"會期":"08-08-03","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"退回程序委員會","日期":["2015-09-25","2015-09-29"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-3"},{"會期":"08-08-04","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會","日期":["2015-10-02","2015-10-06","2015-10-13"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-4"},{"會期":"08-08-04","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"退回程序委員會","日期":["2015-10-02","2015-10-06","2015-10-13"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-4"},{"會期":"08-08-05","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會","日期":["2015-10-16","2015-10-20"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-5"},{"會期":"08-08-06","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會","日期":["2015-10-23","2015-10-27"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-6"},{"會期":"08-08-06","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"退回程序委員會","日期":["2015-10-23","2015-10-27"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-6"},{"會期":"08-08-07","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會","日期":["2015-10-30","2015-11-03"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-7"},{"會期":"08-08-07","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"退回程序委員會","日期":["2015-10-30","2015-11-03"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-7"},{"會期":"08-08-08","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會","日期":["2015-11-06","2015-11-10"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-8"},{"會期":"08-08-08","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"退回程序委員會","日期":["2015-11-06","2015-11-10"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-8"},{"會期":"08-08-09","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會","日期":["2015-11-13","2015-11-17"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-9"},{"會期":"08-08-09","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"退回程序委員會","日期":["2015-11-13","2015-11-17"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-9"},{"會期":"08-08-10","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會","日期":["2015-11-20","2015-11-24"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-10"},{"會期":"08-08-10","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"退回程序委員會","日期":["2015-11-20","2015-11-24"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-10"},{"會期":"08-08-11","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會","日期":["2015-11-27","2015-12-01"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-11"},{"會期":"08-08-11","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"退回程序委員會","日期":["2015-11-27","2015-12-01"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-11"},{"會期":"08-08-12","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會","日期":["2015-12-04","2015-12-08"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-12"},{"會期":"08-08-12","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"退回程序委員會","日期":["2015-12-04","2015-12-08"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-12"},{"會期":"08-08-13","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會","日期":["2015-12-11","2015-12-14","2015-12-15"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-13"},{"會期":"08-08-13","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"退回程序委員會","日期":["2015-12-11","2015-12-14","2015-12-15"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-13"},{"會期":"08-08-14","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會","日期":["2015-12-16","2015-12-17","2015-12-18"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-14"},{"會期":"08-08-14","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"退回程序委員會","日期":["2015-12-16","2015-12-17","2015-12-18"],"會議代碼":"院會-8-8-14"}],"關連議案":[],"議案名稱":"「國民教育法第八條條文修正草案」，請審議案。","提案單位/提案委員":"本院委員賴振昌等18人","議案狀態":"退回程序委員會","mtime":"2024-01-19T00:28:11+08:00","提案來源":"委員提案","議案類別":"法律案","first_time":"2015-06-05","last_time":"2015-12-18","會期":8,"屆期":8,"meet_id":"院會-8-7-15","字號":"院總第1013號委員提案第17828號","laws":["01718"],"提案編號":"1013委17828","提案人":["賴振昌"],"案由":"本院委員賴振昌等18人，有鑒於現行國民教育法第八條，關於國民小學及國民中學課程綱要之規定，授權由教育部常設課程研究發展機構訂定，導致主管機關（教育部）一再違反程序正義，一手炮製黑箱課綱，不但未以各學科專家學者參與，虛辦公聽會，拒絕公布委員名單及公開會議紀錄，以微調之名行意識形態之實，更無視司法機關之判決，一意孤行，使國會難以監督，違反憲法行政院對立法院負責及三權分立之民主精神。爰擬具「國民教育法第八條條文修正草案」，將國民小學及國民中學課程綱要之制訂與修正權利，修正為「另以法律定之」，俾落實國會監督，並使課程綱要制訂與修正之程序更加周延。是否有當，敬請公決。","連署人":["薛凌","劉建國","林淑芬","吳宜臻","黃國書","何欣純","尤美女","姚文智","陳其邁","許添財","李應元","李俊俋","田秋堇","蕭美琴","周倪安","葉津鈴","陳歐珀"],"說明":"一、憲法第五十七條行政院對立法院負責之規定，乃民主國家國會監督之原則與常態。憲法第六十二條及第六十三條復規定，立法院基於最高立法機關，職掌議決法律案之權。唯隨著民主政治之快速發展，政務範圍越來越多，政務事項如鉅細靡遺，一一立法，非但立法機關力有未逮，亦可能因立法與修法程序曠日廢時，無法及時反映社會之需要，更可能逾越行政權與立法權之分際。因此，諸多政務細節，只能在不違背憲法及母法規定之情況下，乃透過立法授權之方式，使行政機關得以自訂法規命令之方式，據以施行，以因應社會及人民之需要。\n二、課程綱要之內容，決定教育之基本方向，引導學生學習那些涵養與能力，關係下一代能否成為一個現代化國民與優質公民，不可不慎。因此，課程綱要之制定與調整除了應尊重專業，廣徵各界聲音，進行有效溝通之外，過程之公開、公正更為必要條件。唯現行國民教育法第八條，關於國民小學及國民中學課程綱要之規定，授權由教育部常設課程研究發展機構訂定。唯近年來，主管機關教育部在高中課綱及十二年國教課綱之調整時，卻一再違反程序正義，一手炮製黑箱課綱，不但未以各學科專家學者參與，還虛辦公聽會，拒絕公布委員名單及公開會議紀錄，違反政府機關資訊應公開透明之原則，以微調之名，行意識形態洗腦之實，更無視司法機關之判決，一意孤行，使原屬於民主國常規之國會監督難以實現，違反憲法行政院對立法院負責及三權分立之精神。且現行國民小學及國民中學課程綱要授權由教育部課程研究發展機構訂定，所謂「課程研究發展機構」，性質上屬研究性質，屬研究性質之機構實務上亦不宜作為決定課程綱要之決策機構，實應予以修正。為避免上述脫軌情況一再發生，爰擬具「國民教育法第八條條文修正草案」，將國民小學及國民中學課程綱要之制訂與修正權利，修正為「應設課程審議委員會，其組成及運作，另以法律定之」，俾落實國會監督，並使國民小學及國民中學課程綱要制訂與修正之程序更加周延。","對照表":[{"law_id":"01718","law_name":"國民教育法","立法種類":"修正條文","title":"國民教育法第八條條文修正草案對照表","rows":[{"現行":"第八條　（課程綱要）\n\n國民小學及國民中學之課程綱要，由教育部常設課程研究發展機構定之。","說明":"為避免教育部在國民小學及國民中學課綱調整時，違反程序正義，一手炮製黑箱課綱，未以各學科專家學者參與，虛辦公聽會，拒絕公布委員名單及公開會議紀錄，違反政府機關資訊應公開透明原則，以微調之名，行意識形態洗腦之實，一意孤行，使原屬於民主國常規之國會監督難以實現，違反憲法行政院對立法院負責及三權分立之精神。且現行授權由教育部所謂「課程研究發展機構」，性質上屬研究性質，屬研究性質之機構，實務上亦不宜作為決定課程綱要之決策機構。爰將本條授權由教育部常設課程研究發展機構訂定之規定修正為，「課程綱要之制定及修正，應設課程審議委員會，其組成及運作，另以法律定之」。俾落實國會監督，並使課綱制訂與修正之程序更加周延。","修正":"第八條　（課程綱要）\n\n國民小學及國民中學課程綱要之制定及修正，應設課程審議委員會，其組成及運作，另以法律定之。"}]}],"ppg_url":"https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/bills/1040525070200400/details"}