{"billNo":"1050505070200100","相關附件":[{"網址":"https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/download/agenda1/02/pdf/09/01/13/LCEWA01_090113_00033.pdf","名稱":"關係文書PDF"},{"網址":"https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/download/agenda1/02/word/09/01/13/LCEWA01_090113_00033.doc","名稱":"關係文書DOC"}],"議案流程":[{"會期":"09-01-13","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會","日期":["2016-05-13","2016-05-17"],"會議代碼":"院會-9-1-13"},{"會期":"09-01-13","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"退回程序委員會","日期":["2016-05-13","2016-05-17"],"會議代碼":"院會-9-1-13"},{"會期":"09-01-14","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會","日期":["2016-05-20","2016-05-24"],"會議代碼":"院會-9-1-14"},{"會期":"09-01-14","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"退回程序委員會","日期":["2016-05-20","2016-05-24"],"會議代碼":"院會-9-1-14"},{"會期":"09-01-15","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會","日期":["2016-05-27","2016-05-31"],"會議代碼":"院會-9-1-15"},{"會期":"09-01-15","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"退回程序委員會","日期":["2016-05-27","2016-05-31"],"會議代碼":"院會-9-1-15"},{"會期":"09-01-17","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會","日期":["2016-06-17","2016-06-21"],"會議代碼":"院會-9-1-17"},{"會期":"09-01-17","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"退回程序委員會","日期":["2016-06-17","2016-06-21"],"會議代碼":"院會-9-1-17"},{"會期":"09-01-18","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會","日期":["2016-06-24","2016-06-28"],"會議代碼":"院會-9-1-18"},{"會期":"09-01-18","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"退回程序委員會","日期":["2016-06-24","2016-06-28"],"會議代碼":"院會-9-1-18"},{"會期":"09-01-19","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會","日期":["2016-07-01","2016-07-05"],"會議代碼":"院會-9-1-19"}],"關連議案":[],"議案名稱":"「赦免法第三條條文修正草案」，請審議案。","提案單位/提案委員":"本院委員蔡易餘等20人","議案狀態":"退回程序委員會","mtime":"2024-01-18T23:22:05+08:00","提案來源":"委員提案","議案類別":"法律案","提案人":["蔡易餘"],"連署人":["李俊俋","許智傑","李應元","林岱樺","莊瑞雄","王定宇","呂孫綾","林靜儀","賴瑞隆","林俊憲","柯建銘","吳玉琴","周春米","鄭寶清","蘇震清","陳明文","張宏陸"],"first_time":"2016-05-13","last_time":"2016-07-05","會期":1,"屆期":9,"meet_id":"院會-9-1-13","字號":"院總第38號委員提案第19092號","laws":["04557"],"提案編號":"38委19092","案由":"本院委員蔡易餘等18人，有鑑於我國憲法賦予總統赦免之權利，但基於我國赦免法第三條規定，判決定讞為赦免之前提要件。參照國外經驗，仍有審判中或尚在追訴階段，國家元首基於領導高度，即予以赦免之案例，且總統特赦權涉及政治高度，為解決爭議司法案件，應放寬我國總統特赦權之限制，爰具擬「赦免法第三條條文修正草案」。是否有當？敬請公決。","說明":"一、現行赦免法第三條規定：「受罪刑宣告之人經特赦者，免除其刑之執行；其情節特殊者，得以其罪刑之宣告為無效。」內容規定特赦之罪刑之宣告為前提，然此與赦免法第四條：「受罪刑宣告之人經減刑者，減輕其所宣告之刑。」就尚未判決確定之案件，亦有將來判決確定後適用減刑之前例可循，造成法律適用之不一致。\n二、根據憲法第四十條規定，「大赦」和「特赦」皆屬總統的赦免權。所謂大赦，指總統針對全國性的特定罪行行使赦免權，至於特赦，是總統對特定已受確定判決之刑事罪犯，免除執行刑罰，是倘若特定事件之判決尚在尚未起訴或訴訟繫屬中，則總統根本無權大赦或特赦，過程中又讓司法衍生之政治問題持續延燒，不利憲法賦予之總統統治權力，是有修正並避免疑義之重要。","對照表":[{"law_id":"04557","law_name":"赦免法","立法種類":"修正條文","title":"赦免法第三條條文修正草案對照表","rows":[{"現行":"第三條　受罪刑宣告之人經特赦者，免除其刑之執行；其情節特殊者，得以其罪刑之宣告為無效。","law_content_id":"04557:04557:1953-02-20-制定:3","說明":"有鑑於現行條文之規定，判決定讞為赦免之必要要件，惟司法審判之現況，因政治現況及社會輿論，難以落實百分百公正司法程序及判決。惟我國當前訴訟之案件，仍有許多客觀政治迫害之司法案件。司法未能處理之案件受害者，應予以赦免之管道終止不正當司法程序，終結迫害。至是，爰擬「其情節特殊者，得以其罪刑之宣告為無效，或免除其追訴權。」將判決確定前案件列入情節特殊之情況，以充實總統赦免權。","修正":"第三條　受罪刑宣告之人經特赦者，免除其刑之執行；其情節特殊者，得以其罪刑之宣告為無效，或免除其追訴權。"}]}],"ppg_url":"https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/bills/1050505070200100/details"}