{"billNo":"1050509070201500","提案單位/提案委員":"本院委員顧立雄等31人","議案名稱":"「法院組織法增訂第十四條之一條文草案」，請審議案。","相關附件":[{"網址":"https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/download/agenda1/02/pdf/09/01/13/LCEWA01_090113_00048.pdf","名稱":"關係文書PDF"},{"網址":"https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/download/agenda1/02/word/09/01/13/LCEWA01_090113_00048.doc","名稱":"關係文書DOC"}],"關連議案":[{"議案名稱":"本院司法及法制委員會報告審查委員顧立雄等31人擬具「法院組織法增訂第十四條之一條文草案」案。","billNo":"1050520070300200"}],"提案人":["顧立雄","段宜康","陳其邁","鄭寶清","張宏陸","邱議瑩","吳思瑤"],"連署人":["林俊憲","黃偉哲","劉世芳","吳玉琴","莊瑞雄","林為洲","周春米","蘇巧慧","徐國勇","蔡易餘","葉宜津","李俊俋","林靜儀","尤美女","鄭麗君","鍾孔炤","蕭美琴","陳素月","何欣純","余宛如","李昆澤","陳曼麗","王榮璋","高潞．以用．巴魕剌Kawlo．Iyun．Pacidal"],"議案狀態":"審查完畢(三讀)","議案流程":[{"會期":"09-01-13","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會 (交司法及法制委員會)","日期":["2016-05-13","2016-05-17"],"會議代碼":"院會-9-1-13"},{"會期":"09-01-13","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"交付審查","日期":["2016-05-13","2016-05-17"],"會議代碼":"院會-9-1-13"},{"院會/委員會":"司法及法制委員會","狀態":"委員會發文","日期":["2016-05-20"]}],"mtime":"2024-01-18T23:36:05+08:00","屆期":9,"first_time":"2016-05-13","last_time":"2016-05-20","議案類別":"法律案","提案來源":"委員提案","meet_id":"院會-9-1-13","會期":1,"字號":"院總第647號委員提案第19127號","laws":["04502"],"提案編號":"647委19127","案由":"本院委員顧立雄、段宜康、陳其邁、鄭寶清、張宏陸、邱議瑩、吳思瑤等31人，鑑於刑事訴訟上重大強制處分乃對人民人身自由及財產權之侵害，應有法官保留原則之適用，並為兼顧強制處分核發之時效性、專業性及中立性，應增設強制處分法庭，以因應日益繁重且需即時復核的司法審查業務之需求，爰提出「法院組織法」增訂第十四條之一條文草案。是否有當？敬請公決。","對照表":[{"law_id":"04502","law_name":"法院組織法","立法種類":"增訂條文","title":"法院組織法增訂第十四條之一條文草案","rows":[{"說明":"一、本條新增。\n\n二、依照法院組織法第十四條「必要時得設專業法庭」之規定，增設強制處分法庭（或令狀法官），以兼顧強制處分核發之時效性、專業性及中立性。\n\n三、為貫徹保全扣押及其他刑事訴訟上重大強制處分採取「法官保留原則」之趨勢與要求（司法院釋字第六三一號解釋），兼顧審查之時效性（如通訊監察應於二十四小時內核復，保全扣押則更具急迫性）與專業性，刑事法院應由專業相當的法官組成強制處分審查專庭，以因應日益繁重且需即時復核的司法審查業務之需求。\n\n四、為維護法官之中立性要求，貫徹公平審判之法官迴避制度的本旨，強制處分審查法官不應同時或隨後擔任本案審理之法官。爰參酌司法院釋字第三九二號、第六三一號解釋之意旨，並參照外國立法例，新增第二項之迴避規定。\n\n五、德國偵查法官制度、法國羈押與自由權法官制度，已有令狀法官之先例。二○○八年之奧地利新刑事訴訟法及瑞士二○一一年之新刑事訴訟法，亦皆立法明文規定強制處分法庭。","增訂":"第十四條之一　地方法院與高等法院分設強制處分法庭，管轄刑事訴訟法或其他法律所定由法官或法院核發之強制處分審查。\n\n強制處分法庭之法官，不得於同一案件之審判程序執行職務。"}]}],"ppg_url":"https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/bills/1050509070201500/details"}