{"billNo":"1071018070200700","提案單位/提案委員":"本院委員李麗芬等17人","議案名稱":"廢止「調度司法警察條例」，請審議案。","相關附件":[{"網址":"https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/download/agenda1/02/pdf/09/06/06/LCEWA01_090606_00028.pdf","名稱":"關係文書PDF"},{"網址":"https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/download/agenda1/02/word/09/06/06/LCEWA01_090606_00028.doc","名稱":"關係文書DOC"}],"關連議案":[],"提案人":["李麗芬"],"連署人":["鍾孔炤","余宛如","蔡易餘","李俊俋","邱泰源","陳瑩","蘇巧慧","趙天麟","陳曼麗","羅致政","鄭運鵬","林靜儀","賴瑞隆","蘇治芬","黃秀芳","張廖萬堅"],"議案狀態":"交付審查","議案流程":[{"會期":"09-06-06","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會 (交司法及法制委員會)","日期":["2018-10-26","2018-10-30"],"會議代碼":"院會-9-6-6"},{"會期":"09-06-06","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"交付審查","日期":["2018-10-26","2018-10-30"],"會議代碼":"院會-9-6-6"}],"mtime":"2024-01-18T20:51:54+08:00","屆期":9,"first_time":"2018-10-26","last_time":"2018-10-30","議案類別":"法律案","提案來源":"委員提案","meet_id":"院會-9-6-6","會期":6,"字號":"院總第647號委員提案第22441號","laws":["04556"],"提案編號":"647委22441","案由":"本院委員李麗芬等17人，鑑於「調度司法警察條例」為民國三十四年制定之法律，其規範內容、用語與現今司法警察實務運作需求已有落差，其中有關檢警之指揮及協助等規定，更可由刑事訴訟法取代，該法之規範實無必要性。爰此，擬提案廢止「調度司法警察條例」。是否有當？敬請公決。","說明":"一、民國一零七年八月間，發生檢察官為私人事務率刑警進入幼兒園逼問孩童之事件，引起社會激憤。濫權檢察官雖經懲處，但就制度面探討，「調度司法警察條例」賦予檢察官獎懲警察之權，有助長濫權疑慮。\n二、「調度司法警察條例」第二至四條關於檢警之指揮及協助相關規範，早為刑事訴訟法第二二九至二三一條所取代，於偵辦程序上已無必要性。\n三、本條例第十一至十三條獎懲之規定及通報，則賦與檢察機關對警察人員逕予獎懲，已違反現行警察之指揮體系並與現行相關人事法規不符。\n四、綜上，「調度司法警察條例」已無存續之必要，擬提案廢止。","ppg_url":"https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/bills/1071018070200700/details"}