{"billNo":"1110317070200400","相關附件":[{"網址":"https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/download/agenda1/02/pdf/10/05/05/LCEWA01_100505_00016.pdf","名稱":"關係文書PDF"},{"網址":"https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/download/agenda1/02/word/10/05/05/LCEWA01_100505_00016.doc","名稱":"關係文書DOC"}],"議案流程":[{"會期":"10-05-05","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會 (交司法及法制委員會)","日期":["2022-03-25","2022-03-29"],"會議代碼":"院會-10-5-5"},{"會期":"10-05-05","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"交付審查","日期":["2022-03-25","2022-03-29"],"會議代碼":"院會-10-5-5"}],"關連議案":[],"議案名稱":"「中華民國刑法刪除第九十條條文草案」，請審議案。","提案單位/提案委員":"本院委員蔡易餘等28人","議案狀態":"交付審查","提案人":["蔡易餘","吳玉琴","蘇震清"],"連署人":["賴惠員","許智傑","陳亭妃","劉櫂豪","陳瑩","蘇治芬","吳秉叡","羅致政","邱志偉","林岱樺","陳秀寳","陳素月","陳歐珀","賴瑞隆","王美惠","邱顯智","何欣純","黃世杰","邱泰源","張其祿","伍麗華Saidhai‧Tahovecahe","林俊憲","林靜儀","高嘉瑜","吳琪銘"],"mtime":"2024-01-18T16:00:35+08:00","屆期":10,"first_time":"2022-03-25","last_time":"2022-03-29","議案類別":"法律案","提案來源":"委員提案","meet_id":"院會-10-5-5","會期":5,"字號":"院總第246號委員提案第28093號","laws":["04536"],"提案編號":"246委28093","案由":"本院委員蔡易餘、吳玉琴、蘇震清等28人，鑒於司法院大法官釋字第812號，宣告刑法第九十條第一項及第二項前段規定：「（第一項）有犯罪之習慣或因遊蕩或懶惰成習而犯罪者，於刑之執行前，令入勞動場所，強制工作。（第二項前段）前項之處分期間為三年。」有違憲法第二十三條比例原則，與憲法第八條保障人身自由之意旨不符，均應自該解釋公布之日起失其效力，爰此提案刪除「中華民國刑法第九十條」條文。是否有當？敬請公決。","說明":"對人身自由之限制，應符合憲法比例原則之要求，憲法第八條所定人民之人身自由，乃行使憲法所保障其他自由權利之前提，應享有充分之保障。依本院歷來之解釋，凡拘束人民身體於特定處所，而涉及限制其人身自由者，不問是否涉及刑事處罰，均須以法律規定，並符合憲法第二十三條比例原則之要求。至於對人身自由之限制是否牴觸憲法，則應按其實際限制之方式、目的、程度與所造成之影響，定相應之審查標準。","對照表":[{"law_id":"04536","law_name":"中華民國刑法","立法種類":"修正條文","title":"中華民國刑法刪除第九十條條文草案對照表","rows":[{"現行":"第九十條　有犯罪之習慣或因遊蕩或懶惰成習而犯罪者，於刑之執行前，令入勞動場所，強制工作。\n\n前項之處分期間為三年。但執行滿一年六月後，認無繼續執行之必要者，法院得免其處分之執行。\n\n執行期間屆滿前，認為有延長之必要者，法院得許可延長之，其延長之期間不得逾一年六月，並以一次為限。","law_content_id":"04536:04536:2005-01-07-修正:106","說明":"一、刪除條文。\n\n二、依據司法院釋字第812號解釋，刑法第九十條有違憲法第二十三條比例原則，與憲法第八條保障人身自由之意旨不符。","修正":"第九十條　（刪除）"}]}],"ppg_url":"https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/bills/1110317070200400/details"}