{"billNo":"1111207070200500","相關附件":[{"網址":"https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/download/agenda1/02/pdf/10/06/12/LCEWA01_100612_00025.pdf","名稱":"關係文書PDF"},{"網址":"https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/download/agenda1/02/word/10/06/12/LCEWA01_100612_00025.doc","名稱":"關係文書DOC"}],"議案流程":[{"會期":"10-06-12","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"排入院會 (交財政委員會)","日期":["2022-12-16","2022-12-20"],"會議代碼":"院會-10-6-12"},{"會期":"10-06-12","院會/委員會":"院會","狀態":"交付審查","日期":["2022-12-16","2022-12-20"],"會議代碼":"院會-10-6-12"}],"關連議案":[],"議案名稱":"「海關進口稅則增訂第21069097號草案」，請審議案。","提案單位/提案委員":"本院委員高嘉瑜等18人","議案狀態":"交付審查","提案人":["高嘉瑜"],"連署人":["何志偉","林岱樺","王美惠","蘇治芬","陳瑩","伍麗華Saidhai‧Tahovecahe","江永昌","陳素月","邱泰源","鍾佳濱","湯蕙禎","張廖萬堅","蔡易餘","黃秀芳","洪申翰","陳秀寳","陳歐珀"],"mtime":"2024-01-18T14:51:16+08:00","屆期":10,"first_time":"2022-12-16","last_time":"2022-12-20","議案類別":"法律案","提案來源":"委員提案","meet_id":"院會-10-6-12","會期":6,"字號":"院總第247號委員提案第29475號","laws":["01529"],"提案編號":"247委29475","案由":"本院委員高嘉瑜等18人，鑒於我國人民平均每人每年花費將近七千元於保健品，已達花在「衣著鞋襪及服飾用品」上的三分之一多。然依現行關稅規定，「錠劑、膠囊狀食物製品」項目的關稅稅率竟較對身體健康有所危害的香菸、及過往常被認定因高關稅招致進口價過高的汽車都來得更高，以致民眾購買進口保健品之價格居高不下；另參酌鄰近國家的保健品關稅稅率，也都遠低於我國。爰增訂「海關進口稅則第21069097號」，調降「錠劑、膠囊狀食物製品」關稅稅率如修正表所列。是否有當？敬請公決。","說明":"一、香菸關稅稅率百分之二十七、汽車關稅稅率百分之十七點五、「錠劑、膠囊狀食物製品」關稅稅率卻高達百分之三十。\n二、再參酌鄰國保健品關稅稅率：美國百分之十、日本百分之一、韓國百分之十二、中國百分之八，我國關稅稅率可謂鄰國之最。\n三、經濟部工業局雖曾向財政部表示：「為協助國內保健營養食品產業持續發展，保有國內市場競爭力，避免被進口產品低價替代，建議維持現行關稅稅率。」惟目前國內的產業現狀，卻是因生產保健品的毛利率高、營收穩定，幾乎成了許多公司營運打底的重要來源，顯已無保護之必要。\n四、另有部分罕病恐須長期服用特定保健品，卻礙於高額關稅，同款保健品國內外售價竟相差五倍之多，對於經濟拮据的家庭，恐雪上加霜。","ppg_url":"https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/bills/1111207070200500/details"}