{"error":false,"id":["149073"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":149073,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/149073","日期":"2023-12-19","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"院會-10-8-12","會議代碼:str":"第10屆第8會期第12次會議","屆":10,"會期":8,"會次":12,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"院會","標題":"立法院第10屆第8會期第12次會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2023-12-19T12:02:38+08:00","結束時間":"2023-12-19T12:05:57+08:00","影片長度":"00:03:19","支援功能":["ai-transcript","gazette"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/6bcf1d98c445b84e9222c78bcdfd1e3063f0728b672d2277c986728e607a03228dd520d2c11f20995ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"邱顯智","委員發言時間":"12:02:38 - 12:05:57","會議時間":"2023-12-19T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第10屆第8會期第12次會議（事由：一、討論事項：本院財政委員會報告彙總完成中華民國113年度中央政府總預算案審查總報告案（社會福利及衛生環境委員會）；本院財政委員會函送外交及國防委員會113年度中央政府總預算案公務預算部分審查報告，請併「中華民國113年度中央政府總預算案審查總報告」討論案；本院財政委員會函送經濟、財政、司法及法制三委員會113年度中央政府總預算案公務預算部分審查報告，請併「中華民國113年度中央政府總預算案審查總報告」討論案；本院財政委員會函送內政、教育及文化、交通三委員會113年度中央政府總預算案公務預算部分審查報告，請併「中華民國113年度中央政府總預算案審查總報告」討論案等15案。 \n二、12月15日上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。）","gazette":{"lineno":14,"blocks":[["邱委員顯智：（12時2分）院長、各位同仁。拖了好幾年，終於今天要進行房屋稅條例修正案的三讀，對於逼出空餘屋、打擊投資的囤房稅部分，我們看到行政院的版本卻只是一個玩弄稅率數字的半套修法。在這個版本中，對於本來最高稅率是3.6%的規定，只提高了1.2%到4.8%，其實將近有97%持有空屋數的人都是一到三戶的個人，在這個版本裡面，每戶只會被課徵多少稅？只會被多課徵0.2%。所以即便是採取全國的總歸戶，每個人最多如果算三戶的話，最多被多課徵了0.6%的稅收、0.6%的稅率。在這個情況之下，怎麼能夠對於持有更多空屋的人有所壓力？必須要到持有超過七戶空屋的時候才會被課徵不過4.8%的最高稅率，對於有意囤房的投資客不僅毫無禁阻的作用，更是讓囤房的操作空間完全不會消失。","更離譜的是，對於住屋起造人，財政部的稅率級距令人匪夷所思，除了是從建商拿到使用執照才開始起算，而且還要超過5年才對起造人課以最高的4.8%的稅率，等於是說如果從預售屋販售開始起算的話，是不是變相的讓建商可以安心的囤房至少7年──7年間漸漸地提高價格，並且慢慢地賣？","時代力量黨團的版本非常清楚，對於個人投資客不僅在稅率上能夠有效地打擊，逼出空餘屋，對於建商的提案，除了能夠鼓勵建商在足夠時間內以正常的、合理的方式販售外，也讓購屋者有更高的機會可以用合理的房價購買，有意並且有效的嚇阻故意囤房的建商，兼顧買賣雙方的利益。對於黨團協商中其他三黨都不同意時力黨團的版本，我們除了表達萬分的遺憾之外，也再次向國人表示，只有時力黨團才是唯一堅持初衷、保護國人居住權益的政黨。"],["主席：好，謝謝邱委員。","接下來請張委員其祿發言。"]],"agenda":{"page_end":450,"meet_id":"院會-10-8-12","speakers":["游錫堃","邱顯智","張其祿","吳怡玎","沈發惠","陳椒華","曾銘宗","邱臣遠","林楚茵","費鴻泰"],"page_start":107,"meetingDate":["2023-12-19"],"gazette_id":"1130106","agenda_lcidc_ids":["1130106_00003","1130106_00004","1130106_00005","1130106_00006"],"meet_name":"立法院第10屆第8會期第12次會議紀錄","content":"房屋稅條例增訂第六條之一條文；刪除第十二條條文；並修正第四條至第六條、第七條、第九\n條、第十一條、第十五條、第十八條、第二十四條及第二十五條條文─ 完成三讀─","agenda_id":"1130106_00002"}},"transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":11.320343750000003,"end":12.56909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":13.058468750000003,"end":14.543468750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":14.644718750000003,"end":19.082843750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":19.53846875,"end":20.28096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":20.80409375,"end":25.140968750000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":25.69784375,"end":32.27909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":32.90346875,"end":34.20284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":34.62471875,"end":36.39659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":36.70034375,"end":38.11784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":38.657843750000005,"end":42.79221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":44.00721875,"end":45.424718750000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":45.86346875,"end":49.35659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":49.67721875,"end":54.351593750000006},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":54.63846875,"end":56.072843750000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":56.494718750000004,"end":57.13596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":57.743468750000005,"end":59.24534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":59.38034375,"end":59.734718750000006},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":60.190343750000004,"end":60.73034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":61.38846875,"end":62.89034375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":63.05909375,"end":63.93659375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":63.97034375000001,"end":65.01659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":65.32034375,"end":65.60721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":66.13034375000001,"end":66.61971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":66.82221875,"end":69.75846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":70.12971875000001,"end":70.87221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":71.29409375,"end":73.82534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":74.28096875,"end":78.19596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":78.61784375,"end":79.19159375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":79.57971875,"end":81.04784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":81.63846875,"end":82.11096875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":82.51596875,"end":83.93346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":84.35534375,"end":87.12284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":87.66284375000001,"end":90.58221875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":90.68346875,"end":92.03346875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":92.13471875,"end":93.09659375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":94.21034375,"end":98.14221875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":98.88471875,"end":100.04909375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":100.50471875000001,"end":103.54221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":103.89659375000001,"end":105.90471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":106.12409375,"end":108.52034375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":108.73971875000001,"end":112.87409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":113.34659375000001,"end":137.61284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":137.95034375,"end":144.63284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":145.12221875,"end":150.23534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":151.34909375,"end":154.06596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":154.42034375,"end":160.00596875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":160.24221875,"end":167.48159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":167.66721875000002,"end":180.12096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":181.21784375000001,"end":184.00221875000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":184.23846875,"end":188.91284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":189.13221875000002,"end":191.57909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":191.74784375000002,"end":195.88221875000002}],"whisperx":[{"start":11.325,"end":18.963,"text":"院長各位同仁拖了好幾年終於今天要進行防護稅條例的修正三讀那對於"},{"start":20.885,"end":39.704,"text":"逼出空餘屋打擊投資的囤房稅的部分我們看到行政院的版本卻只是一個玩弄稅率數字的半套修法在這個版本中本來最高的稅率是3.6%只提高了1.2%到4.8%"},{"start":44.039,"end":61.917,"text":"而且針對其實將近有97%持有空屋數的人都是一到三戶的個人在這個版本裡面每戶只會被課徵多少稅只會被多課徵0.2%"},{"start":66.181,"end":92.799,"text":"所以即便是採取全國的總歸戶每個人最多如果算三戶的話最多被多課徵了百分之0.6的稅收0.6的稅率所以在這個情況之下怎麼能夠對於持有這個更多的空屋的人有所壓力然後呢"},{"start":94.244,"end":112.641,"text":"必須要到持有超過7戶的空屋的時候才會被課徵不過4.8%的最高稅率對於有益囤房的投資客不僅毫無進主的作用更是讓囤房的操作空間完全不會消失"},{"start":113.422,"end":137.123,"text":"更離譜的是對於住屋起造人財政部的稅率局局令人匪夷所思除了是從建商拿到使用執照才開始起算而且還要超過5年才對起造人可以最高的4.8%的稅率等於是說如果從預售屋販售開始算的話"},{"start":138.064,"end":149.58,"text":"是不是變相的讓建商可以安心的囤房至少7年7年間漸漸的提高價格並且慢慢的賣"},{"start":151.397,"end":178.262,"text":"那時代力量版團的版本非常清楚對於個人投資客不僅稅率上能夠有效的打擊逼出空餘屋對於建商的提案除了能夠鼓勵建商在足夠的時間內以正常的合理販售外也讓購物者更有更高的機會可以合理的房價購買有益並且有效的嚇阻故意囤房的建商兼顧買賣雙方的利益"},{"start":181.46,"end":194.688,"text":"對於黨團協商中其他三黨都不同意實力黨團的版本我們除了表達萬分的遺憾之外也再次向國人表示只有實力黨團才是唯一堅持初衷保護國人"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}