{"error":false,"id":["155768"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":155768,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/155768","日期":"2024-10-21","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"委員會-11-2-36-6","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第2會期司法及法制委員會第6次全體委員會議","屆":11,"會期":2,"會次":6,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"委員會","委員會代碼":[36],"委員會代碼:str":["司法及法制委員會"],"標題":"第11屆第2會期司法及法制委員會第6次全體委員會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2024-10-21T09:08:12+08:00","結束時間":"2024-10-21T09:14:26+08:00","影片長度":"00:06:14","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/e70ac4aba65812f000f9f940d20858ecf6b87f55f73740713d41a36ebdecff1319bde232eb5524465ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"吳思瑤","委員發言時間":"09:08:12 - 09:14:26","會議時間":"2024-10-21T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"立法院第11屆第2會期司法及法制委員會第6次全體委員會議（事由：併案審查\n（一）委員翁曉玲等17人擬具「憲法訴訟法第四條條文修正草案」案。\n（二）委員翁曉玲等16人擬具「憲法訴訟法第九十五條條文修正草案」案。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":3.0515937500000003,"end":4.55346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":4.73909375,"end":8.114093750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":8.62034375,"end":20.297843750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":20.719718750000002,"end":21.91784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":22.05284375,"end":22.84596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":23.21721875,"end":32.14409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":32.63346875,"end":36.75096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":37.10534375,"end":48.360968750000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":48.74909375,"end":107.03534375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":107.62596875000001,"end":115.72596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":116.14784375,"end":141.83159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":142.16909375,"end":160.61346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":161.91284375,"end":187.07346875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":187.19159375,"end":206.53034375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":207.22221875000002,"end":214.56284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":214.93409375000002,"end":219.16971875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":219.55784375000002,"end":223.57409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":224.04659375000003,"end":235.16721875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":235.26846875,"end":249.89909375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":250.82721875000001,"end":256.07534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":256.10909375,"end":266.65596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":267.24659375000005,"end":268.57971875000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":270.30096875000004,"end":274.03034375000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":274.67159375,"end":299.62971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":299.89971875000003,"end":301.31721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":302.11034375,"end":318.17534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":318.74909375000004,"end":338.00346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":338.50971875000005,"end":339.75846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":340.33221875000004,"end":342.54284375000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":342.86346875000004,"end":370.77471875000003}],"whisperx":[{"start":3.072,"end":19.917,"text":"主席各位同仁今天在立法院是重中之重今天是不是會有濱林癱瘓憲法法庭對台灣憲政法制案下發動件形成一場核爆"},{"start":21.097,"end":47.729,"text":"這麼重要這麼關切國家憲政運作的憲法訴訟法快速的在上週五院會復議的表決國民黨在野黨成功之後快速的排案那在週五快速排案列入今天議程之後我們看到這個週末台灣的法律專業界快速的動起來"},{"start":48.869,"end":72.001,"text":"有律師發動了聯署聲明反對司法院長懸缺拒絕憲法法庭停擺這群律師的訴求有兩個第一個憲政機關應該共同守護司法繼續向前立法院應立即來排審大法官的人事同意權"},{"start":73.061,"end":76.643,"text":"立法院是憲政機關我們要善盡憲政的忠誠義務大法官人事同意權要進入審查即刻排審這是訴求一訴求二維護憲法法庭的正常運作"},{"start":89.248,"end":115.315,"text":"當拒絕通過憲法訴訟法的修正草案這群律師甚至也要求在野委員撤回這樣一個毀憲亂政的修法所以已經有法界的律師開始串聯這是週五快速的行動這是週末週五呢我們看到有多少個台灣民間的司法單位包括民間司改"},{"start":116.255,"end":120.759,"text":"民間司改會、人權公約施行監督聯盟、臺灣勞工陣線、公民監督國會聯盟、臺灣刑事辯護律師協會、臺灣環境環保保障基金會、臺灣人權促進會、國際特赦組織臺灣分會、還有身障聯盟等等團體也快速的來提出連署呼籲"},{"start":142.316,"end":160.358,"text":"在大法官任期將至的敏感時機倉促的提出憲法訴訟法的修法就是有意要透過立法權單方面停止司法權的運作造成憲法法庭的停擺而在野黨透過本次修法"},{"start":161.943,"end":186.26,"text":"不如要藉著修法來恫嚇影響憲法法庭週五即將進行國會擴權法案的宣判也因為今天快速的修了憲法訴訟法就可以讓大法官人事同意權無限制的停擺因為只要修過了翁曉玲委員的版本未來將沒有任何一屆的"},{"start":187.381,"end":206.239,"text":"大法官可以達到你所說的法定人數如果同意權持續擺爛不予審查的話所以今天我們要嚴肅的在進入審查前提出兩個訴求第一個先審大法官人事同意權再來研議憲法訴訟法的修正"},{"start":207.267,"end":217.134,"text":"必須先讓立委依法要擅盡立委的憲法忠誠義務再行進入憲法訴訟法的討論否則將會造成憲法法庭的空轉"},{"start":224.159,"end":249.506,"text":"第二個訴求這樣一個攸關國家法制憲政基礎的修法我們需要嚴肅的召開公聽會我剛剛快速的把握時間為大家宣讀目前聯署的民間團體法界的專業人士律師界人權界大家都認為這樣的倉促修法不宜"},{"start":250.886,"end":266.166,"text":"那麼這麼多民間的聲音立法院不能視而不見重要的憲法訴訟法在當初2019年2018年立法的時候司法院召開了兩次的公聽會在"},{"start":270.336,"end":298.546,"text":"一百一十二年啊一百一十一年一修的時候也在立法院召開過憲法訴訟法修法的公聽會而今天憲法訴訟法的修正是完全把法定原額現有原額還有裁決數要達三分之二這麼根本關鍵的問題卻沒有任何公聽會的形式來彙聚民間的聲音所以再次強調"},{"start":300.006,"end":317.859,"text":"民間團體大表遺憾大表譴責民間團體的專業意見應當可以在立法院的議事殿堂透過公聽會行使對於憲法訴訟法修法多元的對話在野黨不要害怕"},{"start":318.8,"end":339.425,"text":"第2大法官的人事同意權該行使就行使總統府在8月30就已經將資文送進立法院現在連審查都沒有排審那麼何以急速的來快修癱瘓憲法法庭運作的憲法訴訟法呢立法再大"},{"start":340.425,"end":340.445,"text":"．吳思瑤"},{"start":356.371,"end":369.398,"text":"第二（修法之前．立法院擅盡憲政機關的忠誠義務．大法官人事同意權必須啟動審查必須來行使立委的法定職責謝謝"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}