{"error":false,"id":["155785"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":155785,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/155785","日期":"2024-10-21","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"委員會-11-2-36-6","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第2會期司法及法制委員會第6次全體委員會議","屆":11,"會期":2,"會次":6,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"委員會","委員會代碼":[36],"委員會代碼:str":["司法及法制委員會"],"標題":"第11屆第2會期司法及法制委員會第6次全體委員會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2024-10-21T09:58:15+08:00","結束時間":"2024-10-21T10:01:53+08:00","影片長度":"00:03:38","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/e70ac4aba65812f0728294cc9bd6bee8f6b87f55f737407150be7fc235aa97112cf89a319f4586af5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"陳俊宇","委員發言時間":"09:58:15 - 10:01:53","會議時間":"2024-10-21T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"立法院第11屆第2會期司法及法制委員會第6次全體委員會議（事由：併案審查\n（一）委員翁曉玲等17人擬具「憲法訴訟法第四條條文修正草案」案。\n（二）委員翁曉玲等16人擬具「憲法訴訟法第九十五條條文修正草案」案。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":11.286593750000002,"end":13.024718750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":13.328468750000003,"end":14.20596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":14.762843750000002,"end":18.82971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":19.032218750000002,"end":19.875968750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":20.06159375,"end":22.54221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":22.879718750000002,"end":70.53471875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":70.80471875,"end":80.03534375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":80.69346875000001,"end":90.78471875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":91.78034375,"end":124.24784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":124.58534375,"end":145.25721875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":146.67471875,"end":148.53096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":149.52659375000002,"end":173.37096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":174.02909375000002,"end":201.67034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":201.97409375,"end":215.00159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":217.66784375,"end":218.24159375000002}],"whisperx":[{"start":12.489,"end":34.242,"text":"主席各位委員那我們今天所要審查的這個條文其實連動已經建附二讀的相關的條文那對於這個憲法訴訟的這個制度會有重大的改變必須是以最審慎的這種態度來面對才對所以我們認為應該"},{"start":37.384,"end":37.664,"text":"司法委員"},{"start":58.303,"end":79.423,"text":"而非再一次要透過這種人數的優勢將草案直接闖關並且為了避免這個憲法法庭發生無限期的空轉那停擺的情況也應該要先審查大法官的人事同意權來維護憲法法庭能夠正常的運作"},{"start":80.782,"end":96.542,"text":"如果說不先審查大法官人士就不應該要審查憲法的訴訟法案當我們立法院片面去改變憲法法庭的可決"},{"start":97.995,"end":107.037,"text":"委員翁曉玲等16人擬具:「憲法訴訟法第九十五條條文修正草案案．立法院第九十五條條文修正草案案．立法院第九十五條條文修正草案案．立法院第九十五條條文修正草案案．"},{"start":124.582,"end":125.923,"text":"而這個立法院我們也有這個責任"},{"start":149.594,"end":172.651,"text":"行使這個職權盡快的對大法官人士來進行審查讓我們憲政機關能夠實質的這個循序正常運作避免憲政機關陷入空轉的這個窘境並且這個憲法訴訟的制度也不應該作為政治攻防的這個籌碼若憲法法庭真的不幸被癱瘓"},{"start":174.233,"end":183.504,"text":"這不但是對人民訴訟的權益造成損害也會造成司法權無法制衡行政權及立法權的這種濫權行為導致權力間的這個制衡受到嚴重的破壞"},{"start":189.531,"end":189.551,"text":"好,謝謝。"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}