{"error":false,"id":["155786"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":155786,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/155786","日期":"2024-10-21","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"委員會-11-2-36-6","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第2會期司法及法制委員會第6次全體委員會議","屆":11,"會期":2,"會次":6,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"委員會","委員會代碼":[36],"委員會代碼:str":["司法及法制委員會"],"標題":"第11屆第2會期司法及法制委員會第6次全體委員會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2024-10-21T10:02:00+08:00","結束時間":"2024-10-21T10:05:59+08:00","影片長度":"00:03:59","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/e70ac4aba65812f0971a06813a3191e6f6b87f55f737407150be7fc235aa9711d4763c261ae1c13a5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"沈發惠","委員發言時間":"10:02:00 - 10:05:59","會議時間":"2024-10-21T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"立法院第11屆第2會期司法及法制委員會第6次全體委員會議（事由：併案審查\n（一）委員翁曉玲等17人擬具「憲法訴訟法第四條條文修正草案」案。\n（二）委員翁曉玲等16人擬具「憲法訴訟法第九十五條條文修正草案」案。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":0.03096875,"end":2.41034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":4.334093750000001,"end":4.4353437499999995},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":5.262218750000001,"end":13.007843750000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":13.598468750000002,"end":14.745968750000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":19.403468750000002,"end":20.78721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":21.512843750000002,"end":24.60096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":25.090343750000002,"end":28.70159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":29.106593750000002,"end":42.79221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":43.38284375,"end":49.66034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":50.149718750000005,"end":51.297218750000006},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":51.735968750000005,"end":53.17034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":54.21659375,"end":63.68346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":64.12221875,"end":76.50846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":77.95971875000001,"end":79.71471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":80.18721875,"end":85.80659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":85.95846875000001,"end":90.19409375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":90.63284375,"end":91.18971875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":91.86471875000001,"end":95.05409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":95.42534375000001,"end":98.02409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":99.30659375,"end":102.76596875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":103.99784375,"end":119.80971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":119.91096875000001,"end":124.09596875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":125.14221875000001,"end":126.17159375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":127.11659375,"end":137.59596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":138.99659375000002,"end":147.60284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":148.34534375,"end":151.01159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":151.85534375,"end":162.82409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":164.27534375000002,"end":169.28721875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":169.67534375000002,"end":171.53159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":171.97034375,"end":184.01909375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":184.76159375,"end":195.88221875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":196.01721875,"end":208.30221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":208.47096875000003,"end":236.07846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":236.50034375,"end":236.92221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":238.23846875,"end":239.04846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":239.04846875,"end":239.09909375}],"whisperx":[{"start":0.229,"end":14.535,"text":"發言結束後我們就休息五分鐘不是我剛剛有說就是我們第一輪發言完畢之後休息五分鐘大家討論一下是不是開啟第二輪的發言我剛剛有提到了"},{"start":19.677,"end":41.795,"text":"主席各位同仁我本來想說今天這個法案是國民黨他們掛羊頭賣狗肉的一個法案是掛這個憲法訴訟法的羊頭然後在賣什麼賣癱瘓憲法法庭的狗肉結果沒想到剛剛聽了一輪不是餒不是餒他們是掛狗頭賣狗肉餒"},{"start":43.436,"end":47.626,"text":"他們上來就直接講了他們說我這個法跟憲法訴訟法沒有關係我這個法就是要癱瘓我們就是要癱瘓憲法法庭因為"},{"start":54.264,"end":75.65,"text":"因為這個賴總統提名的不失任的大法官所以在下個禮拜以後大法官只剩八席八席以後三分之二只剩幾個人幾個人來決定也就是他們直接提這個法案目的就是要癱瘓11月1號以後的大法官會議居然講得這麼明這讓我很驚訝讓我今天所準備的東西可能都沒有用了因為你們都直接承認你們就是要癱瘓憲法法庭"},{"start":77.998,"end":97.571,"text":"但是這所有的這些前提就是他們認為就他們說這個賴總統提名的大法官不適任啊應該要趕快賴總統要趕快再重新重新提名啊我們要照單全收嗎各位這些大法官提名人適任不適任是誰說了算啊是翁曉玲說了算嗎是林士敏說了算嗎還是Call in節目說了算還是地下電台說了算"},{"start":104.219,"end":124.043,"text":"當然不是嘛當然是立法院審查結果說的算嘛這些大法官會議這些大法官提名人事任不事任不是我們在這裡說誰事任誰不事任而是最後到底是不是事任是立法院審查之後有通過同意的他就是事任沒有不同意的他就是不事任這麼簡單的道理"},{"start":127.205,"end":147.371,"text":"所以今天國民黨所說的我覺得這個邏輯今天這個法案今天如果要修法很簡單他的前提就是因為提名的大法官不施任所以未來他會不足而那我們就大法官會的人事同意權先審啊先來看到底是不是像翁曉玲講的是不是像林思平講的說都不施任呢"},{"start":148.396,"end":162.177,"text":"我們就來審查,先審查大法官人事同意權如果頭頭不施認,哇憲法法庭的運作有他們擔心的說少數人來決定那我們再來修改這個也不遲阿以你們的人數多數一天就可以碾壓過阿"},{"start":164.332,"end":182.798,"text":"所以我希望主席我們要調整這個程序這個法案應該要在人事同意權審查之後再審查這個是不辨自明的他們自己也講的啦也講說他們今天提這個案的前提就是因為他們覺得現在所提名的人不適任那就來審查嘛"},{"start":185.041,"end":207.763,"text":"這個另外一個最重要的重點就是他們所講的這些解釋什麼大方這個憲法法院判決講死廢死啊講死刑啊講這個國會擴權啊各位憲法法院的判決不是只有這個而且這個是很在裡面很少數大部分的憲法法院的判決都是攸關人民權益他是人民權益的最後救濟手段"},{"start":208.644,"end":228.521,"text":"我們今天癱瘓憲法法庭不是癱瘓他們做這些政有關他們關心的死刑跟這個國會擴權的解釋而已是剝奪了人民權益最終救濟手段我們用一條憲法訴訟法的修正再加上不審人這個人事同意權來剝奪中華民國國民的權益的最後救濟手段這樣對嗎以上"},{"start":238.285,"end":239.019,"text":"謝謝!"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}