{"error":false,"id":["155796"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":155796,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/155796","日期":"2024-10-21","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"委員會-11-2-36-6","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第2會期司法及法制委員會第6次全體委員會議","屆":11,"會期":2,"會次":6,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"委員會","委員會代碼":[36],"委員會代碼:str":["司法及法制委員會"],"標題":"第11屆第2會期司法及法制委員會第6次全體委員會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2024-10-21T10:22:44+08:00","結束時間":"2024-10-21T10:29:32+08:00","影片長度":"00:06:48","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/e70ac4aba65812f07868761b34ad3c69f6b87f55f737407150be7fc235aa97117fdd84d6b9791bcc5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"吳思瑤","委員發言時間":"10:22:44 - 10:29:32","會議時間":"2024-10-21T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"立法院第11屆第2會期司法及法制委員會第6次全體委員會議（事由：併案審查\n（一）委員翁曉玲等17人擬具「憲法訴訟法第四條條文修正草案」案。\n（二）委員翁曉玲等16人擬具「憲法訴訟法第九十五條條文修正草案」案。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":1.4822187500000001,"end":2.88284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":3.57471875,"end":4.941593750000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":5.66721875,"end":11.62409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":12.012218750000002,"end":15.015968750000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":15.69096875,"end":16.39971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":17.14221875,"end":29.579093750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":30.76034375,"end":36.16034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":36.41346875,"end":46.58909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":47.38221875,"end":48.344093750000006},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":48.83346875,"end":71.14221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":71.98596875,"end":83.56221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":84.18659375,"end":88.72596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":89.35034375000001,"end":95.10471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":95.59409375,"end":114.44346875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":115.18596875,"end":119.77596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":120.31596875000001,"end":127.77471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":128.65221875,"end":131.89221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":132.19596875000002,"end":164.79846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":165.43971875,"end":167.63346875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":168.39284375,"end":169.43909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":170.62034375000002,"end":174.72096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":175.90221875,"end":176.56034375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":177.23534375,"end":179.10846875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":179.95221875000001,"end":181.16721875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":181.82534375,"end":183.66471875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":184.57596875000002,"end":187.74846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":188.40659375,"end":193.87409375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":194.12721875000003,"end":199.18971875000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":199.76346875000002,"end":200.89409375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":201.24846875,"end":202.07534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":202.44659375,"end":217.22909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":217.80284375000002,"end":220.33409375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":221.48159375,"end":223.47284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":225.02534375000002,"end":225.76784375000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":226.76346875000002,"end":227.87721875000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":228.31596875000002,"end":229.96971875000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":231.40409375000002,"end":234.57659375000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":235.18409375000002,"end":261.37409375000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":261.81284375,"end":271.87034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":272.68034375,"end":274.62096875000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":275.32971875000004,"end":278.55284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":279.14346875,"end":280.08846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":280.45971875000004,"end":283.14284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":283.59846875,"end":289.75784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":290.04471875,"end":306.63284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":307.35846875000004,"end":312.10034375000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":312.92721875,"end":324.52034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":324.90846875,"end":342.61034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":340.18034375,"end":342.49221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":342.81284375,"end":345.22596875000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":343.87596875,"end":343.97721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":344.28096875,"end":344.43284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":345.79971875,"end":352.61721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":353.59596875,"end":358.32096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":359.46846875,"end":384.15659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":384.32534375,"end":406.92096875000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":398.65221875000003,"end":399.34409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":400.93034375,"end":401.40284375000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":407.68034375,"end":409.14846875}],"whisperx":[{"start":1.513,"end":24.103,"text":"主席各位同仁我要再次強調癱瘓了憲法法庭架空了大法官影響的不是政黨利益影響的是全民的權利我用憲法法庭新制跟舊制實質的數字我們都講數字不要造謠講謊話實質的數字來講新制就是"},{"start":30.816,"end":33.938,"text":"之後受理了1359件釋憲案這是憲法訴訟法修過之後的新制攸關人民申請的釋憲有1336件佔98%"},{"start":47.458,"end":70.836,"text":"救治 修法前的救治受理了747件人民申請的有708件佔了95%所以從新制救治九成五九成八憲法法庭解釋的都是攸關人民權利的議案譬如說如果沒有憲法法庭的解釋我們不可能推動同婚法案"},{"start":72.082,"end":94.014,"text":"如果不是憲法法庭站在代理教師的權益來發聲代理教師跟專任教師的年資跟待遇不可能公平被對待這是人民的權利不是政黨的對立或是政黨的利益閹割了大法官就是對人民的權利開刀第二個我再講數字"},{"start":95.675,"end":112.807,"text":"在野黨的委員一直在說極端案例兩個三個大法官就可以解釋憲法好可怕會有單一觀點會有少數觀點決定了憲法的解釋在哪裡告訴我案例在哪裡就以憲法訴訟法修過之後"},{"start":115.209,"end":117.232,"text":"這幾年來48個申請釋憲案當中有11案大法官需要迴避跟自身的職責相關要迴避"},{"start":128.72,"end":153.459,"text":"只有這11個案迴避但是迴避當中的10個案都還有10位以上的大法官參與評議只有一案比較特殊也有9位大法官參與評議哪裡有兩位三位決定了憲法的生死跟解釋哪裡更何況48件裡面有37件是15位大法官全程參與請告訴我極端"},{"start":157.122,"end":174.457,"text":"案例少數觀點一個兩個三個大法官就決定了憲法的解釋案例在哪裡講出來講出來在哪裡並沒有啊今天你們的手牌叫做拒絕濫魚充數說得好去做做社會的民調剛剛賴委員說大法官是社會的亂源"},{"start":184.642,"end":187.469,"text":"立委恐怕才是社會的亂源吧。"},{"start":188.462,"end":211.055,"text":"不斷的提違憲法案又害怕釋憲就修法來毀憲社會都在看誰在濫魚充數我最後來這一次如果要把先有緣而改為法定緣而整法有十個條文要修連動的是十個條文不是現在吳委員提的少數的兩個條文三個條文而已"},{"start":218.14,"end":225.511,"text":"這需要全面來檢視今天很多委員都在講廢死廢死的這個議題社會確實關注"},{"start":231.428,"end":249.016,"text":"但是大法官的解釋死刑核限不要再製造社會的恐慌而立委負責任該做的是進行死刑核限之後的諸多修法譬如說要修刑法要修刑事訴訟法要修法院組織法"},{"start":249.776,"end":270.768,"text":"要修我們的監獄刑刑法。我們開始來針對死刑核憲啟動進步的修法。我們共同這個是章偉也同意的共同來推動無期徒刑不得假釋的終身監禁制度的配套這是立委要做的事而不是現在來修憲法訴訟法。"},{"start":272.745,"end":282.923,"text":"港澳林斯林書記長說:「國民黨好啊!趕快來選大法官同意權!不反對啊!非常好!非常好!再好也不過了!"},{"start":283.7,"end":310.786,"text":"如果在野黨也同意也認同不要讓憲法法庭開天窗不要癱瘓憲法法庭那就優先即刻的啟動大法官人事同意權的審查透過審查如果你們認為有不適任的你們認為有賴於充數的行使你們的同意權你可以投下不同意票這是立委的法定職責這是我們的憲法忠誠義務"},{"start":313.081,"end":342.122,"text":"先審大法官人事同意權吧剛剛國民黨的黨編說要審會審那就先來審因為簽一法而動全身如果不先行使大法官同意權就搶修憲法訴訟法這就是此地無銀三百兩這就是明確的政治意圖你要讓憲法法庭永遠透過不行使大法官它永遠低於十個人只有八位"},{"start":343.623,"end":357.945,"text":"謝謝我再結論了所以這是你們綁好的一個套餐你們綁好的一個政治的作為不要自欺欺人司馬昭之心路人皆知"},{"start":359.562,"end":382.278,"text":"呼籲再呼籲先審大法官同意權再來研究討論憲法訴訟法是不是要修而修憲法訴訟法這麼嚴肅的事情過去從立法到第一次的修正都召開了公聽會這麼多的學者專家出面連署這麼多的法界人士出來譴責呼籲"},{"start":384.46,"end":384.5,"text":"議員翁曉玲"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}