{"error":false,"id":["155799"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":155799,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/155799","日期":"2024-10-21","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"委員會-11-2-36-6","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第2會期司法及法制委員會第6次全體委員會議","屆":11,"會期":2,"會次":6,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"委員會","委員會代碼":[36],"委員會代碼:str":["司法及法制委員會"],"標題":"第11屆第2會期司法及法制委員會第6次全體委員會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2024-10-21T10:34:14+08:00","結束時間":"2024-10-21T10:38:24+08:00","影片長度":"00:04:10","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/e70ac4aba65812f07d7cabb260754526f6b87f55f737407150be7fc235aa97117778f5872ee59a395ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"沈發惠","委員發言時間":"10:34:14 - 10:38:24","會議時間":"2024-10-21T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"立法院第11屆第2會期司法及法制委員會第6次全體委員會議（事由：併案審查\n（一）委員翁曉玲等17人擬具「憲法訴訟法第四條條文修正草案」案。\n（二）委員翁曉玲等16人擬具「憲法訴訟法第九十五條條文修正草案」案。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":11.657843750000001,"end":13.075343750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":14.324093750000003,"end":16.33221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":17.26034375,"end":26.558468750000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":27.08159375,"end":30.33846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":31.519718750000003,"end":36.447218750000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":36.78471875,"end":45.37409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":45.509093750000005,"end":60.98346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":62.080343750000004,"end":83.66346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":84.32159375,"end":86.39721875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":86.70096875,"end":95.25659375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":95.79659375,"end":96.89346875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":97.36596875000001,"end":99.89721875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":100.92659375000001,"end":118.93221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":119.20221875000001,"end":120.87284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":121.91909375,"end":123.20159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":123.58971875,"end":123.99471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":124.46721875,"end":126.66096875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":126.96471875,"end":135.31784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":136.16159375,"end":141.86534375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":142.55721875,"end":145.27409375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":146.03346875,"end":147.58596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":148.27784375000002,"end":152.34471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":152.63159375,"end":153.99846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":154.20096875000002,"end":171.61596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":172.83096875,"end":201.70409375000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":202.17659375000002,"end":219.23721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":220.55346875,"end":230.72909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":232.12971875000002,"end":248.07659375000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":248.58284375000002,"end":248.97096875000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":249.52784375000002,"end":250.69221875000002}],"whisperx":[{"start":11.97,"end":29.691,"text":"主席各位同仁我想經過剛才這樣子討論我想我們就來釐清林志明委員還留在這裡非常好就是你剛剛上去你也代表國民黨黨團的幹部你剛剛上去你講說今天之所以要修這個法就是因為提名的大法官不是任對不對你是這樣講"},{"start":31.544,"end":60.8,"text":"但是我剛剛也講了這大法官究竟事任不事任不是你林思明說的算對當然不是你說的算對大家投票沒有錯啊大家怎麼投票就是要經過同意權的審人事同意權審查嘛人事同意權審查之後大家如果人事同意權這個人事我們通過了這個大法官通過了就表示他失任這個大法官不通過就表示他不失任這個才是失任不失任不是地下電台或call in節目或者是翁曉玲講或者是林思明講嘛對不對所以"},{"start":62.148,"end":83.345,"text":"我認為說,所以這個是你們今天說為什麼要修這個法的理由?那所以到底適不適任呢?我們就先來審人事同意權嘛。人事同意權審完了,哇!全部通通,如果說你們全部國民黨全部通通把它否決了,全部都不,大家都,你們國民黨認為都不適任。好,那就那才進入說那怎麼辦?人數不夠了,我們是不是要來修?"},{"start":84.386,"end":87.97,"text":"憲法訴訟法這個道理就是這樣子啊為什麼會在還沒有經過人事統一權審查之前就先來審這個憲法訴訟法呢本末導致這個成語就是這樣子"},{"start":100.947,"end":101.127,"text":"這是第一點 第二點"},{"start":121.957,"end":147.104,"text":"我剛剛上次就講了這個你們現在這樣用這種方式來癱瘓11月1號以後的憲法法庭他癱瘓的不是政治他不是說癱瘓了民進黨希望怎麼樣都不是憲法法庭的判決我再講一次他是人民人民的權益的最終救濟手段我們所有的這些憲法法院的判決剛剛吳志耀委員也有講"},{"start":149.023,"end":167.759,"text":"從我們改制成憲法法庭判決之後98%的申請案都是人民申請的不是黨團或者是政府機關申請98%都是人民申請的我們今天癱瘓了你只癱瘓掉你們想要癱瘓那兩趴行政院提出申請的黨團提出申請的立法院提出申請你們想要癱瘓這兩趴卻癱瘓掉98%的人民申請的權益"},{"start":173.001,"end":200.484,"text":"這些東西他整個攸關於什麼他過去的這些憲法法院的判決他攸關代理教師的薪資他包括這些付稅的權益包括所有權的這土地所有權的保障包括工作權的保障包括食品衛生的相關法令規定這些通通是過去零零總總五花八門人民的權益攸關甚至攸關公益的這些食品衛生安全的相關的這些都是憲法法院判決過去判決的這些東西"},{"start":202.265,"end":219.011,"text":"今天如果憲法法院被你們癱瘓了未來所有的這些我剛剛所講的這些復稅權益人民退休撫恤相關的薪資這些食品安全的相關法令這些土地所有權保障工作權保障等等這些人民權益的救濟管道就被你們癱瘓了所以我在在懇求我們委員會我希望說我們不要本末倒置就如你們所講的你們認為大法官不適任那我們就趕快來審查大法官"},{"start":232.199,"end":247.491,"text":"此前提發生之後才有到底憲法訴訟法要不要修的問題所以我們今天應該停止審查這個法案我們先來就人事同意權來看看這些大法官是不是如翁曉玲所講是不是如林思明所講的不適任我們趕快先來審嘛以上"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}