{"error":false,"id":["156633"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":156633,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/156633","日期":"2024-11-08","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"院會-11-2-8","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第2會期第8次會議","屆":11,"會期":2,"會次":8,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"院會","標題":"第11屆第2會期第8次會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2024-11-08T09:20:48+08:00","結束時間":"2024-11-08T09:24:10+08:00","影片長度":"00:03:22","支援功能":["ai-transcript","gazette"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/839debff0083c488e758d79b0849eb7fe9a87489630b308be5c457b811ec949adf663d1e515b30ea5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"羅智強","委員發言時間":"09:20:48 - 09:24:10","會議時間":"2024-11-08T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第2會期第8次會議（事由：一、討論事項：本院國民黨黨團，建請院會作成決議：「本院針對『再生能源相關弊案』乙案成立調查委員會，儘速釐清真相，查清相關失職人員責任，以利預算監督和檢討相關法令，善盡國會監督職責。」是否有當？請公決案等5案。 二、11月8日上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。 三、11月12日下午5時至6時為處理臨時提案時間。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":0.19971875,"end":3.7434687500000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":17.46284375,"end":18.62721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":18.89721875,"end":19.99409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":21.04034375,"end":21.765968750000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":21.90096875,"end":23.74034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":24.49971875,"end":26.17034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":26.52471875,"end":32.05971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":32.92034375,"end":42.58971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":43.416593750000004,"end":54.19971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":54.92534375,"end":59.29596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":59.93721875000001,"end":66.04596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":66.73784375000001,"end":71.41221875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":72.05346875000001,"end":80.44034375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":81.60471875,"end":83.05596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":83.25846875,"end":85.06409375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":86.05971875,"end":87.15659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":87.32534375,"end":89.70471875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":91.03784375000001,"end":92.40471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":93.01221875,"end":100.87596875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":101.58471875000001,"end":102.64784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":103.01909375000001,"end":108.13221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":108.41909375,"end":111.96284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":112.45221875,"end":119.92784375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":120.77159375000001,"end":122.79659375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":123.35346875,"end":127.38659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":127.79159375,"end":131.21721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":131.72346875,"end":135.16596875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":135.65534375000001,"end":141.42659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":141.93284375000002,"end":147.77159375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":148.69971875000002,"end":152.27721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":149.03721875000002,"end":149.77971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":152.56409375,"end":154.97721875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":155.65221875,"end":161.03534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":161.25471875000002,"end":163.43159375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":164.02221875,"end":178.90596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":179.46284375000002,"end":184.25534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":184.57596875000002,"end":187.39409375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":187.71471875,"end":193.67159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":194.43096875,"end":198.04221875000002}],"whisperx":[{"start":0.049,"end":0.57,"text":"絕對的權力,絕對的腐化。"},{"start":21.269,"end":42.271,"text":"執政黨離民意越來越遠,在新國會智庫最近一個月內連續發布的四波民調,就可以清楚看見。67%的民眾認為立法委員對賴清德提名主張廢死的大法官,要投下不同意票。"},{"start":45.181,"end":53.532,"text":"64.9%的民眾認為立法委員不該配合大法官的實質廢死判決去修法提高死刑門檻。"},{"start":56.741,"end":70.307,"text":"82.7%的民眾反對廢除死刑。80.5%的民眾不認同大法官實質廢死的判決。66.3%的民眾希望公投和大選合併。65.8%的民眾希望2026年能夠舉辦反廢死公投並大選。"},{"start":81.733,"end":100.613,"text":"十月15日成立新國會智庫之後,這一段時間我們發布了好幾波的民調。在死刑的部分,目的不只是讓大家知道大法官在做出實質廢死的判決之後,人民的看法如何。"},{"start":101.656,"end":119.389,"text":"更重要的是﹐也提供立法委員在國會裡﹐要如何行使立法權﹐預算審查權﹐人事同意權的參考。也就是說﹐新國會智庫成立的目標﹐就是希望能夠扮演立法院的行動指南針。"},{"start":120.851,"end":147.484,"text":"在這幾波死刑民調為例,新國會智庫也不只問民眾對死刑存廢的態度,滿不滿意大法官對實質廢死的判決,更重要的是立法院會面對好幾個爛攤子,包括要不要配合大法官來違反多數民意修法提高死刑門檻,也包括要不要同意賴清德提名的6位主張廢除死刑的大法官。"},{"start":148.872,"end":162.927,"text":"過去立法委員我們是憑自己主觀的判斷來做出立法的一個判斷但新國會智庫透過委託專業中立的民調機構提供即時客觀的民調"},{"start":164.108,"end":178.309,"text":"就是要告訴立法委員,人民反對立委成為大法官實質廢死的幫兇,也反對立委配合大法官違背多數民意的判決來調高死刑的門檻。"},{"start":179.571,"end":197.3,"text":"所以在新國會智庫我們有一個很重要的一個民主制衡的任務也就是發動議題的主導性然後來對抗現在民進黨擁有強大的一個媒體跟網路的優勢希望能夠優化我們的民主制衡謝謝"}]},"gazette":{"lineno":41,"blocks":[["羅委員智強：（9時21分）絕對的權力，絕對的腐化！執政黨離民意越來越遠，在新國會智庫最近1個月內連續發布的4波民調就可以清楚看見，67%的民眾認為立法委員對賴清德提名主張廢死的大法官要投下不同意票，64.9%的民眾認為立法委員不該配合大法官的實質廢死判決去修法提高死刑門檻，82.7%的民眾反對廢除死刑，80.5%的民眾不認同大法官實質廢死的判決，66.3%的民眾希望公投和大選合併，65.8%的民眾希望2026年能夠舉辦反廢死公投併大選。","10月15日成立新國會智庫之後，這段時間我們發布了好幾波民調，在死刑的部分，目的不只是讓大家知道大法官在作出實質廢死的判決之後人民的看法如何，更重要的是，也提供立法委員在國會裡要如何行使立法權、預算審查權、人事同意權的參考。也就是說，新國會智庫成立的目標就是希望能夠扮演立法院的行動指南針。以這幾波死刑民調為例，新國會智庫也不只問民眾對死刑存廢的態度，滿不滿意大法官實質廢死的判決，更重要的是，立法院會面對好幾個爛攤子，包括要不要配合大法官來違反多數民意，修法提高死刑門檻，也包括要不要同意賴清德提名的6位主張廢除死刑的大法官。","過去立法委員是憑自己主觀的判斷作出立法的判斷，但新國會智庫透過委託專業中立的民調機構，提供即時客觀的民調，就是要告訴立法委員，人民反對立委成為大法官實質廢死的幫兇，也反對立委配合大法官所作違背多數民意的判決來調高死刑的門檻。所以新國會智庫有一個很重要的民主制衡任務，也就是發動議題的主導性，然後對抗現在民進黨擁有強大媒體跟網路的優勢，希望能夠優化我們的民主制衡。謝謝。"],["主席：謝謝羅智強委員的發言。","報告院會，現在登記國是論壇發言的委員均已發言完畢，現在休息，謝謝。","休息（9時24分）"]],"agenda":{"page_end":324,"meet_id":"院會-11-2-8","speakers":["韓國瑜","麥玉珍","張嘉郡","洪孟楷","陳菁徽","涂權吉","許宇甄","羅智強"],"page_start":319,"meetingDate":["2024-11-08"],"gazette_id":"1139101","agenda_lcidc_ids":["1139101_00006"],"meet_name":"立法院第11屆第2會期第8次會議紀錄","content":"國是論壇","agenda_id":"1139101_00011"}}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}