{"error":false,"id":["156656"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":156656,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/156656","日期":"2024-11-11","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"委員會-11-2-20-7","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第2會期財政委員會第7次全體委員會議","屆":11,"會期":2,"會次":7,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"委員會","委員會代碼":[20],"委員會代碼:str":["財政委員會"],"標題":"第11屆第2會期財政委員會第7次全體委員會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2024-11-11T10:01:36+08:00","結束時間":"2024-11-11T10:05:36+08:00","影片長度":"00:04:00","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/774069080e86b69fdfe2713a715715ffee6d8cd9fc431773a12e40efa9c24bd3b057e84e5f10c5cb5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"郭國文","委員發言時間":"10:01:36 - 10:05:36","會議時間":"2024-11-11T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"立法院第11屆第2會期財政委員會第7次全體委員會議（事由：一、邀請行政院主計總處陳主計長淑姿、審計部陳審計長瑞敏率所屬單位主管列席業務報告，並備質詢。\n二、審查中華民國114年度中央政府總預算案有關主計總處暨審計部、審計部臺北市審計處、審計部新北市審計處、審計部桃園市審計處、審計部臺中市審計處、審計部臺南市審計處、審計部高雄市審計處部分。（僅詢答）\n三、審查中華民國114年度中央政府總預算案有關直轄市及縣市政府。調整軍公教人員待遇準備。災害準備金。第二預備金。（僅詢答））","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":7.624718750000001,"end":8.265968750000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":9.04221875,"end":16.872218750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":17.42909375,"end":35.704718750000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":36.345968750000004,"end":44.41221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":44.74971875,"end":46.33596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":46.454093750000006,"end":50.689718750000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":51.28034375,"end":56.74784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":57.439718750000004,"end":63.61596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":64.62846875000001,"end":68.07096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":68.76284375,"end":85.97534375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":86.66721875,"end":90.61596875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":91.59471875000001,"end":94.80096875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":95.12159375,"end":105.80346875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":105.95534375000001,"end":111.13596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":112.26659375000001,"end":113.92034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":114.35909375000001,"end":116.43471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":116.62034375,"end":121.12596875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":121.27784375,"end":123.18471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":123.91034375000001,"end":127.87596875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":128.71971875,"end":135.52034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":136.09409375,"end":146.42159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":147.31596875,"end":156.49596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":156.90096875,"end":158.08221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":158.60534375,"end":162.65534375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":163.12784375,"end":175.49721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":176.67846875,"end":183.10784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":183.93471875,"end":189.45284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":189.87471875,"end":192.06846875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":192.81096875,"end":193.55346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":193.89096875,"end":206.41221875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":207.17159375,"end":211.22159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":211.44096875000002,"end":222.49409375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":223.05096875,"end":225.63284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":226.24034375000002,"end":228.29909375000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":228.87284375000002,"end":230.22284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":230.71221875,"end":238.42409375000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":240.01034375,"end":240.31409375}],"whisperx":[{"start":7.665,"end":34.627,"text":"主席剛剛聆聽幾位國民黨的委員其實患了這個失憶症造成了胡言亂語顛倒是非確實從上個會期開始到這個會期我們對財務法有公聽會過沒有錯而這個會期陳俊生當天招委的時候一、三、五確實是一次會但是從來沒有進入實質的討論都是在屬於程序的發言或者是會議的詢問"},{"start":36.628,"end":63.385,"text":"為什麼我們抱持這種態度我必須跟大家說明因為財化法本身就知識體大不是那麼容易修改各位或許有所不知其實啊財化法是在1951年的時候訂定他第一次把統籌分配款放進去的時候是在1954年一直到1981年的時候相隔27年之久才有一些正式的修法"},{"start":64.853,"end":89.951,"text":"這次的修法當中把中央跟省的部分納進去那後來一直1981到1999相隔18年之久才又會有財法法的重新修法而那一次的修法是為了什麼為了動省所造成的結果所以簡單的講兩次中央的修法不是將近20年就是27年為什麼這段時間不容易修法原因是知識體大"},{"start":91.973,"end":110.88,"text":"剛剛也有提到說所謂的中央集權集權臺灣本來是屬於單一體制它並不是聯邦制所以它需要中央政府來做調控來配置來平衡地方的發展根本是這一步伐根本的意義之所在但是國民黨一再的扭曲"},{"start":112.315,"end":134.311,"text":"更何況呢從剛剛來說國民黨在討論的這個提案當中內容說如果有問題我們可以提出來可是問題那是內容可是我們今天討論的是程序所有的過程當中我們看到程序出現很多很多的瑕疵包括有22個提案4個修正單位當中只送個4個提案為什麼因為民眾黨被丟包"},{"start":136.192,"end":146.165,"text":"民眾黨被丟包的內容當中在今天的會議的這個記錄當中寫得非常清楚藝術錄當中寫得非常清楚後面就沒有民眾黨的提案"},{"start":147.612,"end":174.67,"text":"為什麼我們剛剛一直說為什麼只有3分鐘很清楚這個會議記錄當中也寫得很清楚就是90到90三分這是會議的時間所以說所有內容當中都標示在實質的裡頭但是國民黨混淆視聽的最大的原因是他把那個會議啊定位成所有所謂的黨團的會議並不是真正的財政委員會的會議"},{"start":176.755,"end":179.823,"text":"如果是財政委員會議哪個會議議案要怎麼處理都要經過這個主條的討論"},{"start":184.011,"end":206.148,"text":"即便職權行司法的法案過程當中我們只有一次性的發言還有逐條討論的空間但是在這個財政收支法問法在委員會當中以委員會中心主義的情況底下我們居然完全沒有討論的空間這就是會議過程當中最大的瑕疵"},{"start":207.49,"end":218.366,"text":"會議的瑕疵當然會導致這個結論的有效性這個事情在本委員會當中也曾經出現過本席擔任招委的時候在處理會計法的時候國民黨也提出質疑提出質疑的結果"},{"start":223.393,"end":237.44,"text":"我們整個最後決議主動國民黨把那個會議視為無效後來又重新開會這就是民進黨基本尊重程序的態度我們也希望國民黨學學民進黨把這次的會議視為審查無效"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}