{"error":false,"id":["157716"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":157716,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/157716","日期":"2024-12-02","影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2024-12-02T11:15:14+08:00","結束時間":"2024-12-02T11:24:21+08:00","影片長度":"00:09:07","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/bbf526c2b86e6893ae73a4745c579efd83257d4eed3d4aeff09821e187a9f3e486cf5dcbc0b7422b5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"翁曉玲","委員發言時間":"11:15:14 - 11:24:21","會議時間":"2024-12-02T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第2會期第2次全院委員會「行使司法院院長、副院長及大法官同意權案」公聽會（事由：第11屆第2會期第2次全院委員會「行使司法院院長、副院長及大法官同意權案」公聽會）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":0.03096875,"end":0.8072187500000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":1.8872187500000002,"end":8.51909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":9.09284375,"end":11.94471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":12.113468750000003,"end":25.86659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":26.575343750000002,"end":85.51971875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":86.43096875,"end":99.93096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":100.31909375000001,"end":122.03721875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":123.43784375000001,"end":126.20534375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":126.35721875,"end":151.12971875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":152.31096875,"end":155.95596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":156.22596875000002,"end":169.35471875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":169.74284375000002,"end":174.56909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":174.73784375000002,"end":179.83409375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":180.17159375,"end":185.99346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":181.75784375,"end":182.09534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":186.24659375000002,"end":194.58284375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":195.83159375000002,"end":208.84221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":209.36534375000002,"end":217.76909375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":218.42721875,"end":227.15159375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":228.61971875,"end":236.87159375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":237.22596875000002,"end":238.40721875000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":238.82909375000003,"end":245.34284375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":246.55784375000002,"end":255.48471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":256.09221875000003,"end":281.16846875000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":281.57346875,"end":301.33409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":302.27909375,"end":341.42909375000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":341.95221875000004,"end":354.38909375000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":354.96284375000005,"end":364.21034375000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":366.08346875,"end":433.33034375000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":435.03471875,"end":445.37909375000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":445.59846875000005,"end":448.88909375000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":449.12534375,"end":450.52596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":451.48784375,"end":515.1909687500001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":516.50721875,"end":529.48409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":529.5178437500001,"end":532.8928437500001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":533.24721875,"end":544.46909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":544.9753437500001,"end":546.6797187500001}],"whisperx":[{"start":0.509,"end":25.596,"text":"請發言是 而院長 還有在座各位學者委員各位媒體朋友 各位先生女士 大家好這次進行大法官人事案的這個審查那麼本席以及在在野黨的委員們一定會秉持著嚴格把關 寧缺勿濫的原則去審查這次的大法官人事案"},{"start":26.616,"end":27.057,"text":"公聽會：第11屆第2會期第2次全院委員會"},{"start":42.937,"end":43.959,"text":"公聽會：第11屆第2會期第2會期"},{"start":60.798,"end":85.24,"text":"正因為大法官的釋憲判決是如此的重要所以更要強化憲法法庭的嚴謹度和專業度並且要慎選大法官要選出有良好的人品操守、法律專業能力並且要能夠以民為本可以抵抗政治壓力超越黨派之外並且忠於憲法精神的大法官"},{"start":86.488,"end":109.964,"text":"由於我國大法官的提名方式是由總統一人提名全數的大法官而不是像西方的國家那麼有些是明定部分的憲法法庭的法官是由國會和法院的體系推薦產生因此當總統提名大法官人選的時候如果只看重的是與自己政治立場相近的親近人士而不是廣納"},{"start":110.865,"end":121.766,"text":"多元不同政治立場和法律觀點的人選的時候就有可能會提名的一群政治色彩鮮明法律見解偏頗的大法官"},{"start":123.476,"end":150.622,"text":"大法官的獨立性是極為重要的但是要如何評價大法官們是否獨立、不向當權者靠攏最簡單的方式就是聽其言、觀其行、讀其解釋文特別是針對具有高度政治意義的事先案大法官是否勇於站在與當權者對立的那一面而不是始終都是與當權者同一陣線這個是一個非常重要的觀察指標"},{"start":152.386,"end":168.695,"text":"我們看看過去蔡英文總統提名的那群大法官們他們在釋憲案上面總是力挺執政的政策捍衛總統的意志違反廣大的民意例如針對軍公教退休人員的年金改革的釋憲案"},{"start":170.747,"end":194.26,"text":"來諸標示的釋憲案、農田水利會改制的釋憲案以及近期實質廢死的釋憲案和國會改革釋憲案等等這些都讓人不禁懷疑這群大法官究竟是捍衛人民的權益還是當權者的利益又或是標新利益難怪這群大法官會被冠為是這個保皇派的大法官"},{"start":196.108,"end":217.093,"text":"當初蔡英文提名的這15位大法官好不容易現在已經有7位卸任了現在還留有8位的大法官未來勢必仍將繼續捍衛民進黨的執政利益因此接下來的這7位大法官的人選非常重要必須要是能夠平衡現在憲法法庭一面倒的狀況"},{"start":218.493,"end":245.023,"text":"必須要能夠引進多元不同的法律觀點的大法官才能夠客觀正確的去解釋憲法那適用憲法今天我們審查賴清德總統提名的司法院院長、副院長和大法官的被提名人的這份名單不難看出賴總統的提名是有多麼的用人為親滿滿綠油油的親旅人士"},{"start":247.739,"end":262.946,"text":"司法院院長被提名人張文貞是民進黨申請國會改革法案指定的鑑定人司法院副院長被提名人姚立民則是遊走於政治領域更是賴清德當競選總統時候的主任委員"},{"start":267.428,"end":275.931,"text":"廖福特教授則是民進黨中央黨部的仲裁委員也是中天換照聽證會上面的鑑定人主張中天不讓他換照生律的立場非常鮮明劉靜怡教授曾經擔任黨產條例事件案的鑑定人他主張沒有違反憲法而且還參與卡管案的連署"},{"start":291.075,"end":292.277,"text":"公聽會：第11屆第2會期第2次全院委員會：第11屆第2次全院委員會"},{"start":302.798,"end":323.076,"text":"鄭大的何賴傑教授也曾經在太陽花學運的時候批評當時的行政院院長江一樺說歷史會留下你的罵名他同時也是廢死學者政治立場偏綠那麼陳韻才教授也是挺廢死的學者正是在聯署反對國會改革法案的學者的名單當中那麼他也簽下了他的名字"},{"start":326.158,"end":328.139,"text":"王碧芳法官則是許仲麗院長長期以來的左右手,雖然主導憲法訴訟法的修法,但在這次憲法訴訟的總統爭議上,我們也沒有看到她有提出任何立場見解。"},{"start":342.209,"end":362.143,"text":"台灣法學界和食物界優秀人才何其多,但是賴清德卻提名了一群具有高度爭議性而且政治立場鮮明的人來擔任大法官。如果這波人事案全數通過,可以預見,岌岌可危的大法官公信力將會被全盤摧毀。"},{"start":366.401,"end":387.256,"text":"我們仔細看這次他所提名的這七位大法官其實只有一位具有法院事務經驗那另一位則是政治經驗豐富其餘的五位呢都是學者但是如果剩下的這七位以及接下來就是現在提名的這七位以及現在留任的八位大法官來看他們的這個憲法"},{"start":389.918,"end":390.358,"text":"公聽會：第11屆第2會期第2會期"},{"start":409.831,"end":433.049,"text":"司法院院長本席這裡也保持高度質疑的態度因為張文正教授他沒有行政領導實務運作的經驗對於司法改革、司法人員過勞等等這些問題到底有沒有能力去解決會不會淪為空有理想而不能實踐最後是一事無成留下一堆爛攤子給司法院跟立法院"},{"start":435.083,"end":446.654,"text":"我們知道這幾年來大法官常常自以為是人權的進步者很喜歡將自己的道德信念強加於人民的身上透過視線來造線來造法最後"},{"start":451.53,"end":476.231,"text":"很有可能會讓台灣從所謂的民主法治國被顛覆成為大法官治國那麼這樣這一群的大法官呢他們過去常常變更見解或是對爭議性的議題做出與大多數民意相左的判決那麼這樣這樣子的一個態度這樣的做法基本上是違反了我們講的大法官呢不應該要"},{"start":478.132,"end":478.873,"text":"公聽會．第11屆第2會期第2次全院委員會"},{"start":508.212,"end":514.865,"text":"但是一旦當憲法法庭大法官成為超級立法者的時候還有誰能夠制衡?"},{"start":516.567,"end":539.381,"text":"最後呢我還要再強調的是大法官的選拔不是單選一個人而是我們選擇的是對這個職務名器的重視選擇的是我們對一個全民認同的憲法價值因此大法官的人事案絕不能夠草率通過必須嚴格把關、寧缺勿濫否則將造成憲法災難以上謝謝"},{"start":545.051,"end":545.514,"text":"好,謝謝翁曉玲"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}