{"error":false,"id":["157717"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":157717,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/157717","日期":"2024-12-02","影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2024-12-02T11:24:28+08:00","結束時間":"2024-12-02T11:31:51+08:00","影片長度":"00:07:23","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/bbf526c2b86e68930a2741a476080f8483257d4eed3d4aeff09821e187a9f3e41c7a1f58fb7c6e965ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"吳春城","委員發言時間":"11:24:28 - 11:31:51","會議時間":"2024-12-02T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第2會期第2次全院委員會「行使司法院院長、副院長及大法官同意權案」公聽會（事由：第11屆第2會期第2次全院委員會「行使司法院院長、副院長及大法官同意權案」公聽會）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":1.12784375,"end":40.41284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":40.665968750000005,"end":71.98596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":72.39096875,"end":82.16159375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":82.71846875,"end":97.12971875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":97.61909375,"end":100.25159375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":100.82534375,"end":104.85846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":105.66846875,"end":117.86909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":118.29096875,"end":120.68721875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":121.63221875,"end":129.59721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":130.37346875,"end":180.69471875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":182.11221875,"end":182.78721875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":182.90534375000001,"end":194.02596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":195.00471875000002,"end":207.27284375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":207.66096875000002,"end":216.23346875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":216.97596875000002,"end":218.20784375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":218.34284375000001,"end":221.05971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":221.53221875000003,"end":221.97096875000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":222.19034375,"end":229.91909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":230.62784375,"end":236.33159375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":236.58471875,"end":238.67721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":239.52096875,"end":240.98909375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":241.69784375,"end":247.28346875000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":247.70534375000003,"end":249.05534375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":249.39284375000003,"end":258.89346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":260.37846875,"end":273.03471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":273.27096875,"end":280.02096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":280.61159375,"end":282.23159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":282.53534375000004,"end":285.23534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":285.58971875000003,"end":314.39534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":315.39096875,"end":324.85784375000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":325.36409375,"end":326.59596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":327.05159375,"end":332.56971875000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":334.18971875,"end":337.29471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":338.29034375000003,"end":340.70346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":341.22659375,"end":361.34159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":361.62846875,"end":368.63159375000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":369.45846875,"end":371.55096875000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":372.42846875000004,"end":398.65221875000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":399.10784375000003,"end":418.96971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":419.50971875000005,"end":425.68596875000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":426.46221875000003,"end":430.22534375000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":430.37721875000005,"end":432.40221875000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":432.95909375,"end":437.38034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":440.11409375000005,"end":440.53596875000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":441.27846875,"end":443.43846875}],"whisperx":[{"start":1.495,"end":21.236,"text":"謝謝院長我知道院長非常重視我們的在這公聽會當中的出席那我之所以這個這麼晚到是因為在八樓在審我所主題的壯士代促進法那因為必須要逐條討論我要逐條回答所以以至於"},{"start":21.917,"end":23.978,"text":"主題是我們需要具備專業素養與良知,不受政治影響的大法官"},{"start":40.868,"end":67.181,"text":"司法院的政府院長及大法官們堅負著國家司法的最後法律防線承擔著處理重要法證、人權法律的解釋與憲政機關爭議解決的重大責任所以各國對大法官皆賦予崇高的地位不應受到政治力的干擾或讓不具專業素養或德行者來擔任這個職位"},{"start":70.542,"end":96.541,"text":"以民主成熟還有制度的完善的美國為例大法官的人選對未來美國社會的道德價值觀的導向是舉足輕重因此被世界許多國家肯定民主化成就的台灣大法官的提名若只是政治的考量與短視經歷將對台灣的民主法治面臨的嚴重危機"},{"start":97.922,"end":120.329,"text":"這次大法官的提名名單一出多數人選的獨立性及公正性就被質疑台灣民眾黨在9月23號的時候發函請司法院正副院長及大法官被提名人來填答問卷調查表七位大法官被提名人"},{"start":122.769,"end":128.937,"text":"後來卻發表聯合聲明指出暫時無法答覆資格及適任性的問題"},{"start":130.664,"end":150.034,"text":"11月26日本黨團再次依法提出的問卷調查表就公共服務及參與法律工作之力司法及法律改革活動的參與政黨及政黨活動等基本資料及大法官領選制度修憲門檻與民主的實踐還有113年憲判至第9號國會改革案"},{"start":156.557,"end":180.464,"text":"判決等問題要請所有被提人認真看待並據實來填寫,正是符合獅子審查精神來審慎的行使人事的同意權,讓通過行使大法官能夠超出黨派不受任何的干涉,對國家發展有遠見,能重建人民對司法的信心與對民主機制的信任。"},{"start":182.185,"end":193.743,"text":"所以我們再次提出也呼籲每位被提名人在12月10日進行實質質詢之前能夠回覆"},{"start":195.031,"end":216.008,"text":"然後請各位自行的判斷這樣的問卷該不該回覆不要看上面的臉色不要等像小學生在等老師的指示如果是這樣的大法官這樣被提名的人怎麼樣來承擔這種獨立大法官連填一個問卷自己都不敢"},{"start":216.988,"end":219.33,"text":"大法官是民主國家憲政的守護者具有重要民主的任務應該要超然獨立"},{"start":239.611,"end":258.63,"text":"甚至憲法法庭可以審理總統、副總統的彈劾案以及政黨違憲解散的案件因此若大法官失去獨立性及公正性、專業素養與歷練不足還可能淪為黨同華裔的工具"},{"start":260.441,"end":288.235,"text":"今年10月25日憲法法庭宣布了令人遺憾民主倒退的國會改革憲判結果身為憲法的守護者卻屈服於權力之下為了落實民主制度權者的分立杜絕行政機關逃避監督的謬框為要求行政官員不能說謊、卸責今年立院三讀通過了國會改革法案"},{"start":288.715,"end":313.987,"text":"是為了要健全國會監督的機制矯正政治權益集中於個人或行政權的現況但大法官現判沒收了本應屬於立法委員的執行權、調查權、聽證權讓不符合民主政治運作的總統繼續有權無責行政官員與被詢使可以公然說謊執政黨可以護航不法的官員"},{"start":315.744,"end":337.183,"text":"這樣子有可能繼續讓行政機關怠惰避責因此對提名人必須說明清楚對國會改革的立場與見解的論述因為沒有權者相輔的責任政治離完善的民族就天壤地別的差距了"},{"start":338.362,"end":354.204,"text":"今年來對於不少機構對於司法信任度進行了民調結果顯示大多數的民眾不信任司法今年多項民調的指標都顯示過半的台灣民眾"},{"start":355.325,"end":356.045,"text":"今年8月一項民調顯示"},{"start":372.509,"end":398.315,"text":"至今對於之前8年完全執政的民進黨政府所推動的司法改革民眾非常滿意的只佔6.7%還算滿意的只佔17.4%當人民普遍對以表達對司法的高度不滿時在行使同意權時這些人選是否能夠讓司法被信任是重要的考量因素之一"},{"start":399.255,"end":425.127,"text":"我們期待大法官在憲政、政治與社會等重大爭議事件上能夠積極地扮演引領的角色循序漸進地推進國家與社會的變革也必須要有遠大的大法官不考量太多的當權者意志與政治正確期許大法官要為明日而生而非為今日而爭"},{"start":426.528,"end":435.631,"text":"主要的是要具備足夠的法學素養還有獨立性還有豐富的人生經歷這應該是被關注的終點以上"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}