{"error":false,"id":["158307"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":158307,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/158307","日期":"2024-12-20","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"院會-11-2-14","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第2會期第14次會議","屆":11,"會期":2,"會次":14,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"院會","標題":"第11屆第2會期第14次會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2024-12-20T18:20:54+08:00","結束時間":"2024-12-20T18:23:19+08:00","影片長度":"00:02:25","支援功能":["ai-transcript","gazette"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/02600ffa69e1fadde3fb2c3d8bb70421353956fbd6fa7a968ae1d2be65919fd1b0f568547c5b28c35ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"吳思瑤","委員發言時間":"18:20:54 - 18:23:19","會議時間":"2024-12-20T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第2會期第14次會議（事由：一、討論事項：本院委員傅崐萁等16人擬具「公職人員選舉罷免法部分條文修正草案」，請審議案；本院委員許宇甄等20人擬具「公職人員選舉罷免法部分條文修正草案」，請審議案等22案。（12月20日及24日下午）二、同意權之行使事項：總統咨，依據憲法增修條文第5條規定，提名張文貞、姚立明、何賴傑、陳運財、王碧芳、廖福特、劉靜怡7位為司法院大法官，並以張文貞為院長、姚立明為副院長，咨請同意案。（12月24日上午）三、12月20日上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。四、12月24日下午5時至6時為處理臨時提案時間。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":21.25971875,"end":22.42409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":24.06096875,"end":24.820343750000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":24.97221875,"end":25.64721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":26.457218750000003,"end":27.95909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":28.785968750000002,"end":30.203468750000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":30.74346875,"end":31.58721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":31.87409375,"end":33.24096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":34.00034375,"end":35.02971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":35.23221875,"end":36.91971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":37.409093750000004,"end":38.455343750000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":39.04596875,"end":42.336593750000006},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":43.36596875,"end":44.12534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":44.49659375,"end":46.38659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":46.94346875,"end":49.44096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":49.66034375,"end":51.55034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":52.377218750000004,"end":56.73096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":57.25409375,"end":60.156593750000006},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":60.44346875,"end":65.16846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":66.07971875,"end":67.93596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":68.83034375,"end":69.75846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":70.21409375,"end":72.07034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":72.30659375,"end":74.33159375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":74.68596875,"end":78.24659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":78.95534375000001,"end":82.16159375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":83.30909375,"end":86.46471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":87.08909375,"end":89.14784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":89.56971875,"end":93.87284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":94.54784375000001,"end":106.68096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":107.49096875000001,"end":111.11909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":112.41846875,"end":124.73721875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":125.14221875000001,"end":133.10721875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":133.78221875,"end":145.34159375000002}],"whisperx":[{"start":21.297,"end":42.002,"text":"主席各位同仁恭喜國民黨 賀喜民眾黨在你們的聯手之下憲訴法被表決碾壓了從今以後你們就可以無法無天為非作歹再怎麼違憲的修法也不怕"},{"start":43.427,"end":67.629,"text":"今天憲法訴訟法分兩包第一包第4條跟95條委員會只審過一次我在委員會審查的時候就教於提案的委員翁小玲你要提第4條第3項的修正請問你知不知道第4條的第一項跟第二項在講什麼第一項第二項在講的是"},{"start":68.868,"end":93.488,"text":"大法官的審理規則大法官會議的審理規則憲法法庭的審理規則由司法院定之而上該規則由大法官議決我在跟翁曉琳就教於提案委員她提了第4條的第3項但是她竟然打不出來第一項、第二項在做什麼"},{"start":94.588,"end":110.876,"text":"他竟然不知道憲法法庭的審理規則全文是74條應當由司法院自己來議決而不是立法院可以把手伸到司法權裡頭這就是我們在審查過程荒腔走板"},{"start":112.452,"end":132.113,"text":"第二包直接淨附二讀就是剛剛的30條跟43條完全提高了憲法法庭不論是最終的憲法解釋或是暫時處分的議決門檻這形同於史上最高最難的憲法解釋的門檻就如同上一案我們會為"},{"start":134.055,"end":145.023,"text":"罷免設下史上最難最高的門檻讓罷免走入歷史未來讓大法官的事先解釋很可能也走入歷史非常遺憾"}]},"gazette":{"lineno":56,"blocks":[["吳委員思瑤：（18時21分）主席、各位同仁。恭喜國民黨，賀喜民眾黨，在你們的聯手之下，憲訴法被表決輾壓了，從今以後你們就可以無法無天，為非作歹，再怎麼違憲的修法也不怕。今天憲法訴訟法分兩包，第一包是第四條跟第九十五條，委員會只審過一次，我在委員會審查的時候，就教於提案委員翁曉玲，你要提第四條第三項的修正，請問你知不知道第四條的第一項跟第二項在講什麼？第一項、第二項在講的是大法官的審理規則，大法官會議的審理規則、憲法法庭的審理規則由司法院定之，而上該規則由大法官議決，我就教提案委員翁曉玲，她提了第四條的第三項，但是她竟然答不出來第一項、第二項在做什麼，她竟然不知道憲法法庭的審理規則全文是七十四條，應當由司法院自己來議決，而不是立法院可以把手伸到司法權裡，這就是審查過程荒腔走板。第二包直接逕付二讀，就是剛剛的第三十條跟第四十三條，完全提高了憲法法庭不論是最終的憲法解釋或暫時處分的議決門檻，這形同於史上最高、最難的憲法解釋門檻，就如同上一案，我們會為罷免設下史上最難、最高的門檻，讓罷免走入歷史，也很可能未來讓大法官的釋憲解釋走入歷史，非常遺憾。"],["主席：謝謝吳思瑤委員的發言。","報告院會，現在立法程序後發言所有委員均已經發言完畢，現在有立法委員傅崐萁等人針對討論事項第三案之決議提出復議，並請院會立即處理。"]],"agenda":{"page_end":84,"meet_id":"院會-11-2-14","speakers":["韓國瑜","江啟臣","李坤城","王義川","郭昱晴","范雲","吳思瑤"],"page_start":62,"meetingDate":["2024-12-20"],"gazette_id":"1140501","agenda_lcidc_ids":["1140501_00002","1140501_00003"],"meet_name":"立法院第11屆第2會期第14次會議紀錄","content":"憲法訴訟法修正第三十條條文─ 完成三讀─","agenda_id":"1140501_00005"}}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}