{"error":false,"id":["158671"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":158671,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/158671","日期":"2025-01-03","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"院會-11-2-16","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第2會期第16次會議","屆":11,"會期":2,"會次":16,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"院會","標題":"第11屆第2會期第16次會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2025-01-03T09:17:29+08:00","結束時間":"2025-01-03T09:20:13+08:00","影片長度":"00:02:44","支援功能":["ai-transcript","gazette"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/665605feb7119a68b4af581627fb9b9f0fed75ed6b8c59fea6585d7448d10f9def73f5eace86becf5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"張智倫","委員發言時間":"09:17:29 - 09:20:13","會議時間":"2025-01-03T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第2會期第16次會議（事由：一、討論事項：本院交通委員會報告併案審查委員傅崐萁等20人、委員陳雪生等29人分別擬具「發展觀光條例第二條及第七十條之二條文修正草案」、委員許宇甄等20人擬具「發展觀光條例第四條、第五十三條及第七十條之二條文修正草案」、委員林倩綺等21人擬具「發展觀光條例第三十六條及第六十條條文修正草案」、委員王美惠等16人擬具「發展觀光條例部分條文修正草案」、委員伍麗華Saidhai Tahovecahe等20人擬具「發展觀光條例第五十五條、第五十五條之一及第五十五條之三條文修正草案」及委員游顥等38人擬具「發展觀光條例第七十條之二條文修正草案」案等31案。二、1月3日上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。三、1月7日下午5時至6時為處理臨時提案時間。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":15.218468750000003,"end":19.43721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":20.12909375,"end":22.28909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":22.84596875,"end":25.54596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":26.81159375,"end":36.00846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":36.447218750000005,"end":42.18471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":42.43784375,"end":43.63596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":43.922843750000006,"end":45.509093750000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":46.11659375,"end":47.922218750000006},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":49.187843750000006,"end":50.01471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":50.28471875,"end":51.66846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":51.98909375,"end":53.57534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":53.89596875,"end":56.055968750000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":56.41034375,"end":58.19909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":58.72221875,"end":59.312843750000006},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":59.56596875,"end":60.22409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":60.42659375,"end":62.45159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":64.17284375,"end":80.81159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":80.94659375,"end":89.50221875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":90.14346875000001,"end":95.05409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":95.62784375000001,"end":104.63909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":104.94284375000001,"end":105.55034375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":105.90471875,"end":112.60409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":112.94159375000001,"end":122.35784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":123.03284375000001,"end":139.21596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":139.36784375000002,"end":141.67971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":143.48534375,"end":146.69159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":146.96159375000002,"end":157.40721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":157.99784375000002,"end":161.40659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":161.64284375,"end":162.48659375}],"whisperx":[{"start":15.273,"end":25.345,"text":"副院長各位同仁各位媒體朋友大家早安大家好民主不是民進黨做主請執政黨正式六成民意"},{"start":26.857,"end":44.534,"text":"去年年底立法院通過財政收支劃分法公職人員選舉罷免法和憲法訴訟法修正草案當時賴總統說要用更大的民主來解決今年的元旦談話賴總統更說人民有選舉罷免創制複決的權利"},{"start":49.226,"end":60.7,"text":"可以匯集更大的民主力量展現主權在民的真諦然後行政院就在昨天2號針對限訴法提出復議"},{"start":64.229,"end":88.488,"text":"行政院提出的附議三大理由本席覺得非常荒謬首先第四條只要按修正後的憲法訴訟法總統只要在兩個月內補足大法官人選立法院收到大法官名單後就會進速安排人事同意權審查那總統不進速補提名難道是因為綠色大法官的人選難產嗎"},{"start":90.219,"end":104.262,"text":"其次說30條已不合理的門檻妨礙憲法法庭的運作請問面對憲政高度以及法律是否違憲的訴訟不應該用更高的門檻來使其更嚴謹嗎第三說第95條會癱瘓憲法法庭的運作其實也太嚴過其實"},{"start":113.044,"end":141.454,"text":"真正實際癱瘓憲法法庭的不是民進黨黨團以黨紀來否決賴清德總統提名的大法官人選嗎在多數的民主國家只要國會擁有大法官人事同意權被提名者都必須考量人選是否可以讓國會大多數來接受所以本席要呼籲賴清德總統正視六成的民意"},{"start":143.51,"end":161.889,"text":"提出專業性獨立性的大法官不要再提出廢死大法官和綠色大法官且深切體會少數應服從多數的民主真諦不是只有民進黨做主才叫做民主以上 謝謝"}]},"gazette":{"lineno":30,"blocks":[["張委員智倫：（9時17分）副院長、各位同仁、各位媒體朋友，大家早安、大家好。民主不是民進黨作主，請執政黨正視六成民意。去年年底立法院通過財政收支劃分法、公職人員選舉罷免法和憲法訴訟法修正草案，當時賴總統說要用更大的民主來解決。今年的元旦談話，賴總統更說人民有選舉、罷免、創制、複決的權利，可以匯集更大的民主力量，展現主權在民的真諦，然後行政院就在昨天（2號）針對憲訴法提出覆議。","行政院提出覆議的三大理由，本席覺得非常荒謬。首先，按照修正後的憲法訴訟法第四條，總統只要在兩個月內補足大法官人選，立法院收到大法官名單後，就會儘速安排人事同意權審查。賴總統不儘速補提名，難道是因為綠色大法官的人選難產嗎？其次是說第三十條以不合理的門檻，妨礙憲法法庭運作，請問面對憲政高度以及法律是否違憲的訴訟，不應該用更高的門檻使其更嚴謹嗎？第三是說第九十五條會癱瘓憲法法庭的運作，其實也太言過其實，真正癱瘓憲法法庭的不是民進黨黨團以黨紀來否決賴清德總統提名的大法官人選嗎？在多數的民主國家，只要國會擁有大法官人事同意權，都必須考量被提名者人選是否可以讓國會大多數接受，所以本席要呼籲賴清德總統正視六成的民意，提出專業性、獨立性的大法官，不要再提出廢死大法官和綠色大法官，且深切體會少數應服從多數的民主真諦，不是只有民進黨作主才叫做民主。以上，謝謝。"],["主席：謝謝張委員。","接下來請陳菁徽委員發言。"]],"agenda":{"page_end":496,"meet_id":"院會-11-2-16","speakers":["江啟臣","麥玉珍","張嘉郡","許宇甄","羅智強","林倩綺","張智倫","陳菁徽"],"page_start":491,"meetingDate":["2025-01-03"],"gazette_id":"1141001","agenda_lcidc_ids":["1141001_00009"],"meet_name":"立法院第11屆第2會期第16次會議紀錄","content":"國是論壇","agenda_id":"1141001_00035"}}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}