{"error":false,"id":["158810"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":158810,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/158810","日期":"2025-01-10","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"全院委員會-11-2-3","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第2會期第3次全院委員會會議","屆":11,"會期":2,"會次":3,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"全院委員會","標題":"第11屆第2會期第3次全院委員會會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2025-01-10T11:49:42+08:00","結束時間":"2025-01-10T11:55:00+08:00","影片長度":"00:05:18","支援功能":["ai-transcript","gazette"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/8352309f1a657e646746baa194ddc62dc87b31a464016ad51d549386d2c9f156047be7cfaf59973b5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"徐巧芯","委員發言時間":"11:49:42 - 11:55:00","會議時間":"2025-01-10T11:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第2會期第3次全院委員會會議（事由：審查「憲法訴訟法」修正第四條、第三十條及第九十五條條文覆議案。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":6.08909375,"end":16.68659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":16.93971875,"end":27.874718750000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":28.58346875,"end":32.11034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":32.58284375,"end":33.37596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":33.86534375,"end":46.72409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":46.994093750000005,"end":56.44409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":57.119093750000005,"end":58.890968750000006},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":59.447843750000004,"end":64.18971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":64.66221875000001,"end":70.33221875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":70.75409375000001,"end":91.32471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":91.96596875,"end":106.34346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":106.59659375000001,"end":112.04721875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":112.28346875000001,"end":127.30221875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":127.69034375000001,"end":146.23596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":146.59034375000002,"end":152.02409375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":152.61471875,"end":155.92221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":156.37784375,"end":160.81596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":161.23784375,"end":165.65909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":165.87846875000002,"end":168.56159375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":168.98346875000001,"end":178.82159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":180.59346875,"end":191.95034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":192.43971875000003,"end":193.92471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":194.44784375,"end":219.05159375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":219.35534375,"end":233.88471875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":234.69471875000002,"end":243.04784375000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":243.55409375000002,"end":256.05846875000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":256.48034375000003,"end":261.23909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":261.47534375000004,"end":282.72096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":283.15971875,"end":311.00346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":316.25159375000004,"end":317.34846875}],"whisperx":[{"start":6.107,"end":26.81,"text":"民進黨不斷告訴大家說憲法訴訟法會影響到人民的釋憲說99%要釋憲的人都是由人民來申請的但他卻不告訴大家真正能夠通過釋憲申請的只有1%到2%其中大多都是民進黨提的釋憲"},{"start":28.632,"end":56.145,"text":"我講一個釋憲給大家聽誰的釋憲通過了呢卡神卡神楊蕙如等人曾對政府機關也就是大阪辦事處的處長這個蘇建這個處長這個大阪事務處被依侮辱執罪犯判刑五個月得一顆罰金定業結果呢他跑去申請釋憲然後呢釋憲挑戰成功"},{"start":57.186,"end":62.28,"text":"所以我要講的事情是我們的大法官侮辱公務員他們說這是合憲的"},{"start":64.755,"end":91.009,"text":"我們的大法官他們對於民眾的感受是完全不在乎的在台灣八成的民眾是反對廢死可是我們的大法官的解釋卻做出了死刑實質上廢死的這樣子的一個判決也讓我們在各家的民調機構當中看到了大家對大法官對司法的不信任"},{"start":92.049,"end":111.323,"text":"所以今天憲法訴訟法要求的是什麼是要有一個更謹慎的機制讓大法官去聆聽人民的聲音而不是聆聽特定黨派或是特定人的聲音我要再講一次你們所說的人民釋憲是什麼樣的人民釋了什麼憲"},{"start":112.384,"end":126.964,"text":"卡神杨慧如逼得人家自伤离开了人世在这种情况之下本来已经被判刑结果她申请释宪之后说无法公务人员是合宪的"},{"start":127.805,"end":155.621,"text":"然後呢也他被定驗的案件被廢棄發回所以我們的大法官到底是在保護什麼樣的人我們的大法官現行之下他在保護一位傷害公務員讓他痛苦到自己傷害自己的性命離開之後人家去告了楊蕙如他去申請了釋憲大法官說你沒有錯所以呢最後所有的定驗的判決都沒有事情"},{"start":156.431,"end":178.518,"text":"我想要問這位外交官的在天之靈有人在乎嗎當時沸沸揚揚的大家都在為這位外交官出氣的時候人民是怎麼想的大法官有聽到嗎五六公務員在大法官的眼裡只要是民進黨的好朋友去提示線的可以申請過關甚至可以被判核限"},{"start":180.666,"end":206.284,"text":"那這樣子的大法官不需要一個更嚴謹的制度讓大家來聆聽民眾的意見嗎不需要更謹慎的去思考民意之所需嗎所以如果今天我們的司法體系包含司法檢調還有我們的大法官都只聽命於特定的政黨特定的執政黨成為全法官的時候"},{"start":207.405,"end":233.405,"text":"難道不需要憲法訴訟法裡面有更嚴格的標準讓他們在做出判決的時候更仔細的去聆聽人民的意見再做出決定嗎所以我認為憲法訴訟法不是為了某一個政黨不是為了某一個法律而設定的而是要求大法官不要做恐龍大法官大法官要好好的聆聽民間的意見"},{"start":234.758,"end":255.768,"text":"不然以後現在是死刑看起來核限但是實質上是廢死那請問下一次呢這次過了關下次再有廢死團裡再去申請一次的時候是不是那時候他們就要說推翻過去的直接宣布死刑核限廢死核限了"},{"start":256.588,"end":282.32,"text":"是不是呢?這個有符合我們多數台灣人的想法嗎?所以當我們要求更多的大法官共同做出決議才算數的時候我們是當人民法官要求大法官要更加的接力氣要更加的去思考民意要把民意跟法律兩者結合在一起我們國家的公民民主社會才是真正的救康"},{"start":283.24,"end":310.218,"text":"而我們作為立法委員不就是要接洽司法的公平性以及人民的聲音的中間的橋樑嗎所以國民黨這一次我們所做的事情是希望連結一個好的橋樑讓大家能夠更相信法治但沒想到很多人在反對的時候總是在扯政黨政治其實只要賴清德總統兩個月內提出好的人選出來不就能夠"},{"start":316.338,"end":316.519,"text":"谢谢许晴"}],"gazette":[{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:49:48.107000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:50:08.810000+08:00","text":"民進黨不斷告訴大家憲法訴訟法會影響到人民的釋憲，說99%要釋憲的人都是由人民來聲請的，但它卻不告訴大家真正能夠通過釋憲聲請的只有1%到2%，其中大多都是民進黨提的釋憲。","quality":0.961},{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:50:10.632000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:50:13.773000+08:00","text":"我講一個釋憲給大家聽，誰的釋憲通過了呢？","quality":1},{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:50:14.634000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:50:32.962000+08:00","text":"卡神，卡神楊蕙如等人曾對政府機關──也就是大阪辦事處的蘇處長……他被依侮辱職務罪判刑5個月，得易科罰金定讞，結果呢？","quality":0.824},{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:50:33.262000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:50:38.125000+08:00","text":"他跑去聲請釋憲，然後釋憲挑戰成功。","quality":0.933},{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:50:39.186000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:50:52.018000+08:00","text":"所以我要講的事情是，我們的大法官對於侮辱公務員，他們說這是合憲的，我們的大法官，他們對於民眾的感受是完全不在乎的。","quality":0.962},{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:50:52.818000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:51:12.989000+08:00","text":"在臺灣有八成的民眾反對廢死，可是我們大法官的解釋，卻做出了實質上廢死的判決，也讓我們在各家的民調機構當中看到了大家對大法官、對司法的不信任。","quality":0.985},{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:51:14.049000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:51:17.872000+08:00","text":"所以今天憲法訴訟法要求的是什麼？","quality":1},{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:51:17.872000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:51:27.979000+08:00","text":"是要有一個更謹慎的機制讓大法官去聆聽人民的聲音，而不是聆聽特定黨派或是特定人的聲音。","quality":1},{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:51:28.760000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:51:50.225000+08:00","text":"我要再講一次，你們所說的人民釋憲是什麼樣的人民釋了什麼憲，卡神楊蕙如逼得人家自殺，離開了人世，在這種情況之下，本來已經被判刑，結果他聲請釋憲之後，說侮辱公務人員是合憲的，然後呢？","quality":0.713},{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:51:51.346000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:51:57.650000+08:00","text":"他被定讞的案件被廢棄發回，所以我們的大法官到底是在保護什麼樣的人？","quality":0.968},{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:51:58.390000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:52:17.601000+08:00","text":"我們的大法官在保護一位傷害公務員，讓他痛苦到自己傷害自己的性命，其離開之後人家去告了楊蕙如，他去聲請了釋憲，結果大法官說他沒有錯，所以最後所有定讞的判決都沒有事情。","quality":0.921},{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:52:18.431000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:52:23.753000+08:00","text":"我想要問，這一位外交官的在天之靈有人在乎嗎？","quality":0.95},{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:52:23.753000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:52:31.095000+08:00","text":"當時沸沸揚揚大家都在為這位外交官出氣的時候，人民是怎麼想的大法官有聽到嗎？","quality":1},{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:52:31.635000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:52:50.091000+08:00","text":"侮辱公務員在大法官的眼裡，只要是民進黨的好朋友去提釋憲的就可以聲請過關，甚至可以被判合憲，那這樣子的大法官不需要一個更嚴謹的制度讓大家來聆聽民眾的意見嗎？","quality":0.89},{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:52:50.091000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:52:54.535000+08:00","text":"不需要更謹慎的去思考民意之所需嗎？","quality":1},{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:52:54.535000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:53:21.515000+08:00","text":"所以如果今天我們的司法體系，包含司法、檢調還有大法官，都只聽命於特定的政黨，特定的執政黨成為全法官的時候，難道不需要憲法訴訟法裡面有更嚴格的標準，讓他們在做出判決的時候，更仔細的去聆聽人民的意見再做出決定嗎？","quality":1},{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:53:21.515000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:53:44.642000+08:00","text":"所以我認為憲法訴訟法不是為了某一個政黨、不是為了某一個法律而設定的，而是要求大法官不要做恐龍大法官，大法官要好好的聆聽民間的意見，不然以後……現在是死刑看起來合憲，但是實質上是廢死，那請問下一次呢？","quality":0.978},{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:53:45.902000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:53:59.028000+08:00","text":"這次過了關，下次再有廢死團體再去聲請一次的時候，是不是那時候他們就要說推翻過去的，直接宣布廢死合憲了，是不是呢？","quality":0.922},{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:54:00.069000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:54:03.630000+08:00","text":"這個有符合我們多數臺灣人的想法嗎？","quality":1},{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:54:03.630000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:54:24.300000+08:00","text":"所以，當我們要求更多的大法官共同做出決議才算數的時候，我們是幫人民把關，要求大法官要更加的接地氣，要更加的去思考民意，要把民意跟法律兩者結合在一起，我們國家的公民、民主社會才是真正的健康。","quality":0.942},{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:54:25.240000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:54:33.726000+08:00","text":"而我們作為立法委員，不就是要接洽司法的公平性以及人民聲音的中間的橋梁嗎？","quality":0.971},{"speaker":"徐委員巧芯","start":"2025-01-10T11:54:33.726000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2025-01-10T11:54:52.218000+08:00","text":"所以國民黨這一次所做的事情，是希望連結一個好的橋梁，讓大家能夠更相信法治，但沒想到很多人在反對的時候，總是在扯政黨政治，其實只要賴清德總統兩個月內提出好的人選出來，不就能夠順利地讓憲法法庭繼續運作了嗎？謝謝。","quality":0.823},{"speaker":"主席","start":"2025-01-10T11:54:52.718000+08:00","guessed":true,"end":"2025-01-10T11:54:55.575143+08:00","text":"謝謝徐巧芯委員的發言。","quality":0},{"speaker":"主席","start":"2025-01-10T11:54:55.875143+08:00","guessed":true,"end":"2025-01-10T11:55:01.303714+08:00","text":"接下來請鍾佳濱委員發言，翁曉玲委員請準備。","quality":0}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}