{"error":false,"id":["158812"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":158812,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/158812","日期":"2025-01-10","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"全院委員會-11-2-3","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第2會期第3次全院委員會會議","屆":11,"會期":2,"會次":3,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"全院委員會","標題":"第11屆第2會期第3次全院委員會會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2025-01-10T12:00:40+08:00","結束時間":"2025-01-10T12:05:53+08:00","影片長度":"00:05:13","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/8352309f1a657e64b7f003694eb04d31c87b31a464016ad578a69d0fc0847165d511c68266aedb1d5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"翁曉玲","委員發言時間":"12:00:40 - 12:05:53","會議時間":"2025-01-10T11:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第2會期第3次全院委員會會議（事由：審查「憲法訴訟法」修正第四條、第三十條及第九十五條條文覆議案。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":5.11034375,"end":5.835968750000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":6.00471875,"end":12.31596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":12.88971875,"end":20.449718750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":20.93909375,"end":22.71096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":23.21721875,"end":28.38096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":28.48221875,"end":30.878468750000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":31.18221875,"end":32.751593750000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":32.95409375,"end":40.58159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":41.189093750000005,"end":52.275968750000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":52.562843750000006,"end":54.807218750000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":55.39784375,"end":74.09534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":74.31471875000001,"end":90.51471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":91.18971875000001,"end":120.04596875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":120.75471875000001,"end":121.42971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":121.81784375000001,"end":124.06221875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":124.31534375000001,"end":126.32346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":126.76221875,"end":131.79096875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":132.80346875,"end":149.12159375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":149.54346875000002,"end":151.29846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":151.63596875000002,"end":153.05346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":154.16721875000002,"end":160.76534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":160.98471875,"end":177.85971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":179.51346875000002,"end":182.78721875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":182.95596875,"end":183.46221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":183.90096875,"end":186.16221875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":186.65159375000002,"end":197.95784375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":199.39221875,"end":212.72346875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":200.01659375000003,"end":200.25284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":214.03971875000002,"end":222.66284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":222.96659375000002,"end":225.00846875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":225.56534375,"end":226.86471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":228.24846875,"end":230.29034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":230.42534375000002,"end":231.30284375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":231.64034375000003,"end":246.38909375000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":246.74346875,"end":256.17659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":256.29471875,"end":273.03471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":273.45659375,"end":276.49409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":276.86534375,"end":284.00346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":284.49284375,"end":286.26471875000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":287.15909375,"end":292.10346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":292.86284375,"end":311.47596875}],"whisperx":[{"start":5.151,"end":19.858,"text":"院長在座的各位委員各位媒體朋友各位全國的朋友們大家好今天我們在這裡針對行政院所提出的復議案即將要進行投票表決"},{"start":21.58,"end":39.917,"text":"剛剛鍾嘉斌委員說憲法訴訟法的修法是搞不懂的事情是沒有經過充分討論的事情我在這邊要跟各位報告憲法訴訟法從一開始由本人提案之後就經過社會上面廣泛的討論"},{"start":41.218,"end":54.499,"text":"那麼在司法法治委員會裡面還有在經過之後的二讀三讀其實都有不斷的討論跟發言這個案子非常清楚"},{"start":55.458,"end":81.453,"text":"非常清楚他就是參考西方先進民主國家裡面對於憲法法庭要求要有一個最低出席的大法官人數才能夠參與審議才能夠做成裁判為什麼在西方國家認為是一個好的制度只要是我們把它引進到台灣"},{"start":82.393,"end":97.75,"text":"民進黨政府就認為這是一個立法擴權認為這是一個毀憲亂政的制度實在是不可思議從上個會期我們針對國會改革法案裡面所制定的國會調查權"},{"start":99.692,"end":119.509,"text":"藐視國會罪的處罰相關的規定這些都是在西方國家早就行之有年的制度可是偏偏引進到台灣之後立刻也是被行政院附議被大法官又宣告是嗜血我們現在看到民進黨政府的所作所為"},{"start":121.016,"end":131.222,"text":"對於明明是一個好的一個憲政制度的改革強力的杯葛這個已經引起了其他國家在看笑話"},{"start":132.861,"end":152.903,"text":"大家知道不管是日本法國以及我們這次憲法訴訟法最後通過的是參考像是捷克的版本要求大法官要最少要10人出席9人才可以做成宣告法律違憲的判決這在別的地方早就這個都是這麼做的"},{"start":154.209,"end":177.18,"text":"以我們現在大法官在憲法裡面規定要有15個人才就是我們大法官憲法明天要有15個人才可以運作可是當我們大法官出現多數缺額只剩下8位大法官的時候我們人民放心將這麼重要的案子放給那些少數的大法官就可以做成憲法判決嗎"},{"start":179.614,"end":196.179,"text":"行政院這次提出的復議案有很多部分是只講了一半沒有講了下半段確實我們現在憲法訴訟的案件極大多數都是由民眾申請99%的案件都是由人民申請憲法訴訟可是"},{"start":199.754,"end":226.608,"text":"被駁回的也就是有100件人民申請的訴訟案件裡面有97件都是不受理駁回大法官頂多是在這100件案件當中受理那兩三件行政院說現在這個在憲法法庭代審的有480幾個477件的這個事先案件大家知道這是累積多少年才有的事先案件"},{"start":228.302,"end":253.337,"text":"大法官不积极的审理就算了那么还想要用这种少数大法官就做出可能会宣告一个重要的法律案违宪或是剥夺人民这个权利的这样的宪法判决我们能够容忍吗我们能够看得下去吗所以这一次宪法诉讼法大法官改革法案其实重要的目的就是要健全"},{"start":254.097,"end":276.212,"text":"整个宪法法庭的制度这个没有蓝绿之分不管未来谁这个执政然后大法官的组成不管是蓝的多或是绿的多或是白的多这不分蓝绿的我们就是要求一个完整的健全的宪法法庭的制度那么民进党那么他现在对于"},{"start":277.412,"end":291.558,"text":"國會所通過的任何的法案只要是不合他們的意不滿他們的意就提起復議然後定而申請釋憲這個已經造成台灣憲政民主極為重要的危機"},{"start":292.919,"end":310.334,"text":"我們實在是不願意看到台灣的憲政機關繼續對抗對立下去我們在這裡懇請全國的民眾都能夠支持我們這次的大法官改革我們待會也會即將要去投出仍然是贊成我們原來法案的決議謝謝"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}