{"error":false,"id":["158813"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":158813,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/158813","日期":"2025-01-10","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"全院委員會-11-2-3","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第2會期第3次全院委員會會議","屆":11,"會期":2,"會次":3,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"全院委員會","標題":"第11屆第2會期第3次全院委員會會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2025-01-10T12:06:01+08:00","結束時間":"2025-01-10T12:11:11+08:00","影片長度":"00:05:10","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/8352309f1a657e642c6903f7f41a4531c87b31a464016ad578a69d0fc08471653b15e738d91a4af85ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"吳思瑤","委員發言時間":"12:06:01 - 12:11:11","會議時間":"2025-01-10T11:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第2會期第3次全院委員會會議（事由：審查「憲法訴訟法」修正第四條、第三十條及第九十五條條文覆議案。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":3.6590937500000003,"end":5.0934687499999995},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":5.95409375,"end":8.78909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":9.447218750000001,"end":15.404093750000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":16.11284375,"end":18.67784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":18.93096875,"end":22.47471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":22.930343750000002,"end":26.44034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":27.08159375,"end":29.933468750000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":31.03034375,"end":37.72971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":38.50596875,"end":43.939718750000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":44.665343750000005,"end":47.44971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":47.736593750000004,"end":50.94284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":51.44909375,"end":57.57471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":58.266593750000006,"end":59.68409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":60.52784375,"end":64.89846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":65.15159375,"end":67.69971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":68.23971875000001,"end":75.22596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":75.59721875000001,"end":82.98846875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":83.93346875,"end":89.33346875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":89.90721875,"end":93.78846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":94.26096875,"end":98.37846875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":99.08721875,"end":110.15721875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":110.39346875000001,"end":121.32846875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":122.17221875000001,"end":133.10721875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":133.51221875000002,"end":144.22784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":145.08846875,"end":148.36221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":148.56471875,"end":150.65721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":151.11284375,"end":169.96221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":170.41784375,"end":179.47971875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":180.08721875,"end":181.82534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":181.85909375,"end":187.93409375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":188.38971875000001,"end":204.38721875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":204.94409375,"end":224.51909375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":225.29534375,"end":233.12534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":233.36159375000003,"end":242.98034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":243.45284375000003,"end":258.45471875000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":258.75846875,"end":280.34159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":280.78034375000004,"end":287.17596875000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":287.56409375000004,"end":305.97471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":308.65784375000004,"end":309.36659375}],"whisperx":[{"start":3.683,"end":29.665,"text":"主席 各位同仁我要來駁斥一下假訊息喔榮總沒有麻疹的大流行這是假訊息 人民不要恐慌但是呢 現在的立法院卻是有著違憲上癮的流行病而且一再的蔓延 一再的擴散這是一屆最愛違憲的立法院"},{"start":31.089,"end":59.192,"text":"我接替在翁曉琳委員之後來發言我真的有很深的感觸提案來癱瘓憲法法庭他說這是司法改革要摧毀國家的憲法被他說成了是在守護憲法這就是一種違憲上癮的流行病傳染病非常的危險"},{"start":60.88,"end":89.017,"text":"從上個會期國會擴權法案被宣判違憲之後很清楚的立法院要自治院際之間是平等相違的立法院沒有這麼大國會優惠並不存在所以立法院不能夠來破壞其他憲法機關的核心權力領域的形式但是大法官的違憲宣判沒有讓在野黨的委員反省自治"},{"start":89.978,"end":117.445,"text":"民意的反撲也沒有讓藍白的委員感到害怕反而變本加厲繼續違憲我們看看從立法院職權行使法到才化法到選罷法到警察人員人事條例到原住民的組織法國會一再的自肥擴權國會一再的掏空國家財政國會一再的沒休人民權利"},{"start":119.045,"end":142.393,"text":"國會甚至讓年改走回頭路一修二修都是二修這些違憲的二修的法律猶如一把把的利刃刺進台灣民主的心臟現在討論的憲法訴訟法就是違憲的重中之重惡中之惡因為它等同於是實質的違憲"},{"start":145.174,"end":169.584,"text":"只有民進黨在反對限訴法嗎?不!民團站出來反對法律專業界從修法前站出來遊行到今天要進行復議案之前超過數百位的法學專家再次連署呼籲立法院應當支持行政院的復議案收回違憲的惡法"},{"start":170.824,"end":186.257,"text":"為什麼藍白的委員嘴上說憲法沒有顏色但是卻在行使自己政黨的利益藍白愛維憲 藍白怕事憲所以藍白合力來摧毀憲法"},{"start":188.499,"end":204.051,"text":"行政院當然有權利提出憲訴法的附議案因為行政院要守護人民的權利大家都說了99%的憲法訴訟案是人民的救濟的案件"},{"start":204.992,"end":222.058,"text":"第二作為最高的行政機關所有的法律如果不可行 至愛難行基於捍衛行政院自身的憲法忠誠義務不受剝奪行政院當然要提起復議來尋求救濟"},{"start":225.359,"end":242.57,"text":"所以說呢 剛剛汪小玲委員繼續把她一直說錯的事情繼續再說極端少數來做違憲宣判的案例從經驗上 從學理上都不存在"},{"start":243.57,"end":257.985,"text":"美國的最高法院大法官有九位同樣是三分之二評議二分之一同意在美國沒有人說這是極端案例這會危及憲政"},{"start":258.866,"end":278.4,"text":"德國聯邦憲法法院有16位大法官但是分成兩庭一庭只有8位大法官比我們15位大法官更少同樣是三分之二評議二分之一做成違憲的宣判在德國也沒有人說這是摧毀憲法"},{"start":280.862,"end":305.743,"text":"所以藍白就是為了政治的意識形態怕違憲就來毀憲而再一次的程序不正義今天的復議案行政院長沒有辦法來說明報告因為藍白不敢面對社會不敢接受挑戰懇請大家支持行政院的復議案退回惡法謝謝"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}