{"error":false,"id":["161485"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":161485,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/161485","日期":"2025-05-16","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"院會-11-3-12","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第3會期第12次會議","屆":11,"會期":3,"會次":12,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"院會","標題":"第11屆第3會期第12次會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2025-05-16T14:54:06+08:00","結束時間":"2025-05-16T14:57:22+08:00","影片長度":"00:03:16","支援功能":["ai-transcript","gazette"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/fe07dedb5caff746eb6166ce14c80fbdb8e2d73ce5d96c5b042849b9113b1e8973c3e5e214b715b05ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"郭昱晴","委員發言時間":"14:54:06 - 14:57:22","會議時間":"2025-05-16T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第3會期第12次會議（事由：一、討論事項：本院委員許宇甄、羅智強、葛如鈞等52人擬具公投提案主文為：「賴清德總統定位對岸為境外敵對勢力，人民擔心兩岸進入準戰爭狀態。你是否同意政府應避免戰爭，不讓台灣變成實施軍事戒嚴、青年喪命且家園被毀的烏克蘭？」請公決案等16案。二、5月16日上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。三、5月20日下午5時至6時為處理臨時提案時間。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":11.590343750000002,"end":18.44159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":19.26846875,"end":24.92159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":25.512218750000002,"end":33.291593750000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":33.94971875,"end":41.37471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":42.134093750000005,"end":45.96471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":46.33596875,"end":49.407218750000006},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":50.09909375,"end":52.81596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":53.27159375,"end":59.59971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":60.156593750000006,"end":69.06659375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":69.33659375,"end":74.46659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":74.93909375,"end":77.43659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":77.74034375000001,"end":79.57971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":79.79909375000001,"end":82.81971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":83.08971875,"end":85.78971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":87.20721875000001,"end":91.91534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":92.45534375000001,"end":101.53409375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":102.07409375,"end":120.13034375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":120.78846875,"end":126.62721875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":127.35284375,"end":131.60534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":131.99346875,"end":140.98784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":141.19034375,"end":143.08034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":144.27846875,"end":147.21471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":147.28221875,"end":158.48721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":159.65159375000002,"end":162.89159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":163.53284375,"end":171.71721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":172.17284375,"end":176.76284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":177.53909375,"end":180.22221875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":180.59346875,"end":183.27659375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":183.76596875,"end":187.57971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":187.79909375000003,"end":190.88721875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":191.03909375,"end":194.26221875000002}],"whisperx":[{"start":11.638,"end":18.271,"text":"院長以及所有在場的同仁還有電視機前面正在收看直播的朋友"},{"start":19.318,"end":40.838,"text":"死刑在法院合議庭必須一致決是有其憲政跟人權背景死刑是不可逆的一個重刑更需要更高層次的司法跟確信以及共識判處一個人死刑不能只是投票而必須是整體的司法價值的共同承擔"},{"start":42.199,"end":59.393,"text":"再次的強調台灣實質上並沒有廢除死刑而實質上法律仍然保有死刑然而藍白呢針對廢死的這個議題惡意的想要綁著所有的公投在政治上其實具有非常明確的一個目的啦"},{"start":60.234,"end":85.447,"text":"其實就是想要藉由主張讓人民來決定死刑的存廢塑造自己好像跟平民百姓站在一起或者是想要維繫他們所謂的維持社會安全的一個形象刻意是要來聚焦媒體跟民間的一個注意討好迎合反廢死的一個民意說穿了就是怕被罷免"},{"start":87.267,"end":112.589,"text":"此行的議題不但涉及人權、司法制度跟憲法的價值更應該要透過專業的辯論而不是情緒的勒索動員為主的用公投的方式歐洲人權法院它說了人權保障不應交付多數決其實就是擔心對特定犯罪的情緒反應而非理性的判斷"},{"start":113.53,"end":142.828,"text":"死刑的存廢本來就不應該成為政黨操作的民粹的武器再次的強調目前我們的法律條文死刑仍然存在特殊的案件仍然有判死死刑的一個判決雖然台灣死刑的執行門檻極高也需要在合議庭當中的法官全體同意一致才能夠判決死刑"},{"start":144.332,"end":162.243,"text":"但是目前光台灣的刑法還有刑事訴訟法仍然保留死刑作為最高的刑罰有60多項的犯罪行為最重是可以判處死刑在這裡我真的是要建議藍白的委員"},{"start":163.824,"end":179.925,"text":"與其你們現在在搞這種詐騙空殼的公投還不如好好的去檢討為什麼罷綠委的過程當中是這麼的荒腔走板連署的錯誤率是這麼的高"},{"start":180.686,"end":194.162,"text":"死人連署也這麼的多被司法調查還要去違法去包圍北檢那我只能說大罷免大成功不適任的立委被罷免掉剛好而已"}]},"gazette":{"lineno":33,"blocks":[["郭委員昱晴：（14時54分）院長以及所有在場的同仁，還有電視機前面正在收看直播的朋友。死刑在法院合議庭必須一致決有其憲政跟人權背景，死刑是不可逆的一個重刑，更需要更高層次的司法確信以及共識。判處一個人死刑不能只是投票，而必須是整體司法價值共同承擔。再次強調，臺灣實質上並沒有廢除死刑，而實質上法律仍然保有死刑，然而藍白針對廢死的議題，惡意的想要綁著所有的公投，在政治上其實具有非常明確的目的，就是想要藉由主張讓人民決定死刑的存廢，塑造自己好像跟平民百姓站在一起，或者是想要維繫他們所謂的維持社會安全的形象，刻意聚焦媒體跟民間的注意，討好、迎合反廢死的民意，說穿了就是怕被罷免。","死刑的議題，不但涉及人權、司法制度跟憲法價值，更應該透過專業的辯論，而不是用情緒勒索、動員為主的公投方式。歐洲人權法院說了：人權保障不應交付多數決。其實就是擔心對特定犯罪的情緒反應，而有非理性的判斷，死刑的存廢本來就不應該成為政黨操作的民粹武器。","再次強調，目前我們的法律條文，死刑仍然存在，特殊的案件仍然有判處死刑的判決，雖然臺灣死刑的執行門檻極高，也需要合議庭法官全體一致同意，才能夠判決死刑，但是目前光臺灣的刑法還有刑事訴訟法仍然保留死刑作為最高刑罰，有六十多項的犯罪行為最重可以判處死刑，在這裡，我真的要建議藍白的委員，與其你們現在在搞這種詐騙、空殼的公投，還不如好好的去檢討為什麼罷綠委的過程當中是這麼的荒腔走板、連署的錯誤率是這麼的高、死人連署也這麼的多，被司法調查，還要違法包圍北檢，那我只能說大罷免、大成功，不適任的立委被罷免掉剛好而已。"],["主席：謝謝郭昱晴委員發言。","接下來請郭國文委員發言，林月琴委員請準備。"]],"agenda":{"page_end":100,"meet_id":"院會-11-3-12","speakers":["韓國瑜","江啟臣","莊瑞雄","鍾佳濱","沈伯洋","王義川","黃捷","李柏毅","陳培瑜","蘇巧慧","沈發惠","吳思瑤","林楚茵","陳亭妃","賴瑞隆","張雅琳","李坤城","徐富癸","張宏陸","郭昱晴","郭國文","林月琴","陳俊宇","王美惠","林俊憲","劉建國","李昆澤","許智傑","林宜瑾","邱議瑩","王定宇","何欣純","陳瑩","黃秀芳","伍麗華Saidhai‧Tahovecahe","吳琪銘","羅美玲","陳素月","王正旭","陳秀寳","范雲","吳秉叡","賴惠員","邱志偉","陳昭姿","張啓楷","吳宗憲","羅智強","牛煦庭","賴士葆","徐巧芯","洪孟楷","林淑芬","林岱樺","陳冠廷"],"page_start":64,"meetingDate":["2025-05-16"],"gazette_id":"1144801","agenda_lcidc_ids":["1144801_00002","1144801_00003"],"meet_name":"立法院第11屆第3會期第12次會議紀錄","content":"本院委員吳宗憲等52人擬具公投提案主文為：「您是否同意『各級法院合議庭法官判處死刑不須\n一致決』之政策？」請公決案─通過─","agenda_id":"1144801_00004"}}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}