{"error":false,"id":["161488"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":161488,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/161488","日期":"2025-05-16","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"院會-11-3-12","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第3會期第12次會議","屆":11,"會期":3,"會次":12,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"院會","標題":"第11屆第3會期第12次會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2025-05-16T15:04:00+08:00","結束時間":"2025-05-16T15:07:32+08:00","影片長度":"00:03:32","支援功能":["ai-transcript","gazette"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/fe07dedb5caff7468cd73ed1d2cf0046b8e2d73ce5d96c5bddbfeff83a0576a356161e727e47ac5e5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"陳俊宇","委員發言時間":"15:04:00 - 15:07:32","會議時間":"2025-05-16T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第3會期第12次會議（事由：一、討論事項：本院委員許宇甄、羅智強、葛如鈞等52人擬具公投提案主文為：「賴清德總統定位對岸為境外敵對勢力，人民擔心兩岸進入準戰爭狀態。你是否同意政府應避免戰爭，不讓台灣變成實施軍事戒嚴、青年喪命且家園被毀的烏克蘭？」請公決案等16案。二、5月16日上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。三、5月20日下午5時至6時為處理臨時提案時間。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":14.05409375,"end":33.52784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":33.83159375,"end":42.876593750000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":43.737218750000004,"end":54.87471875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":55.515968750000006,"end":61.034093750000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":61.135343750000004,"end":65.40471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":65.70846875000001,"end":71.46284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":71.66534375,"end":72.84659375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":73.30221875000001,"end":75.34409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":75.51284375,"end":77.70659375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":77.97659375,"end":86.59971875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":87.07221875,"end":99.79596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":100.06596875000001,"end":101.58471875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":102.12471875,"end":107.32221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":108.08159375000001,"end":113.85284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":114.42659375000001,"end":114.91596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":116.56971875,"end":133.96784375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":135.04784375,"end":145.91534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":146.59034375000002,"end":159.58409375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":160.15784375,"end":177.58971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":178.58534375000002,"end":182.60159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":182.95596875,"end":198.78471875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":207.96471875,"end":208.40346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":208.62284375000002,"end":209.97284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":211.40721875000003,"end":212.26784375000003}],"whisperx":[{"start":14.09,"end":42.218,"text":"好 主席各位在場的委員同仁依據憲法所主張的主權在民的一個原則也為了確保我們國民能夠行使直接民權公投保障我們公民參與政治決策的一個權利但是今天我們在這裡討論這個公投案如同前面許多委員所提到的實際上就是一個假議題"},{"start":43.823,"end":60.503,"text":"此時此刻的台灣根本就沒有廢死我們也看到在今年的一月份法務部還在執行這個死刑犯而這個113年憲判制第八號的一個憲法判決"},{"start":61.294,"end":86.267,"text":"所宣告的是死刑為有條件的這個合憲在現行的這個法律框架之下透過嚴謹的一個判決程序台灣依舊保留死刑的一個存在實在想不通國民黨為什麼需要在此時此刻透過立法院來提一個這樣的一個空殼的一個公投"},{"start":87.145,"end":114.506,"text":"那進一步看到公投提案的一個主文寫道您是否同意各級法院和議庭法官判處死刑不需一字決之政策那從字面上來看並非他們也是反對這個死刑的部分而是在論述上一直提到說這個反廢死那"},{"start":116.738,"end":145.396,"text":"換言之僅僅是要透過這個投票來決定我們各級法院在評議判被告死刑的時候何一庭法官們的一個意見需不需要完全一致基本上與支持或反對廢死毫不相干所以根本不能夠稱作是反廢死的一個公投而且這項公投的一個主文還會抵觸先前這個憲法法庭的一個判決"},{"start":146.838,"end":159.33,"text":"縱使今天在立法院通過了在三個月後也透過公民投票通過了恐怕也只是這個虛耗公帑浪費社會資源的一個無效公投"},{"start":160.219,"end":177.31,"text":"那這次立法院所發起的一個公投案也即將在稍後再次以藍白多數表決通過來破壞司法立法之間的一個權力分立為了只是自己在政治上的一個操作是在刻意誤導台灣人民"},{"start":178.829,"end":197.996,"text":"轉移注目焦點模糊民眾判斷的一個方向我們記憶猶新去年藍白聯手毀憲亂政提出許多的惡法亂三總預算讓行政部門無法正常的運作來癱瘓國家甚至企圖弱化國防對中共的文攻武嚇"},{"start":203.39,"end":203.41,"text":"好,謝謝"}]},"gazette":{"lineno":51,"blocks":[["陳委員俊宇：（15時4分）主席、各位在場的委員、同仁。依據憲法所主張的主權在民原則，也為了確保我們國民能夠行使直接民權，公投保障我們公民參與政治決策的權利，但是今天我們在這裡討論這個公投案，如同前面許多委員所提到的，實際上就是一個假議題。此時此刻的臺灣根本就沒有廢死，我們也看到在今年的1月份，法務部還在執行死刑犯，而113年憲判字第8號的憲法判決所宣告的是死刑為有條件的合憲。在現行法律框架之下，透過嚴謹的判決程序，臺灣依舊保留死刑的存在，實在想不通國民黨為什麼須要在此時此刻透過立法院提出這樣的空殼公投。","進一步看到公投提案的主文寫到「您是否同意『各級法院合議庭法官判處死刑不須一致決』之政策？」從字面上來看，他們也並非反對死刑，而是在論述上一直提到「反廢死」。換言之，這僅僅是要透過投票決定各級法院在評議判被告死刑的時候，合議庭法官們的意見須不須要完全一致，基本上與支持或反對廢死毫不相干，所以根本就不能夠稱為反廢死的公投，而且這項公投的主文還會牴觸先前憲法法庭的判決。縱使今天這在立法院通過，也在3個月後透過公民投票通過了，恐怕也只是虛耗公帑、浪費社會資源的無效公投。","這次立法院發起的公投案，也即將在稍後再次以藍白多數表決通過，破壞司法、立法之間的權力分立，為的只是自己在政治上的操作，是在刻意誤導臺灣人民，轉移矚目焦點、模糊民眾判斷的方向。我們記憶猶新的是，去年藍白聯手毀憲亂政，提出許多惡法，亂刪總預算讓行政部門無法正常運作以癱瘓國家，甚至企圖弱化國防，對中共的文攻武嚇、滲透卻未能究責，這不禁讓我們感到失望，因此我們堅定地反對這項空殼公投。大罷免、大成功！"],["主席：謝謝陳俊宇委員的發言。","報告院會，登記第22號及登記第30號的何欣純委員與王美惠委員對調發言次序。","接下來我們請王美惠委員發言，林俊憲委員請準備。"]],"agenda":{"page_end":100,"meet_id":"院會-11-3-12","speakers":["韓國瑜","江啟臣","莊瑞雄","鍾佳濱","沈伯洋","王義川","黃捷","李柏毅","陳培瑜","蘇巧慧","沈發惠","吳思瑤","林楚茵","陳亭妃","賴瑞隆","張雅琳","李坤城","徐富癸","張宏陸","郭昱晴","郭國文","林月琴","陳俊宇","王美惠","林俊憲","劉建國","李昆澤","許智傑","林宜瑾","邱議瑩","王定宇","何欣純","陳瑩","黃秀芳","伍麗華Saidhai‧Tahovecahe","吳琪銘","羅美玲","陳素月","王正旭","陳秀寳","范雲","吳秉叡","賴惠員","邱志偉","陳昭姿","張啓楷","吳宗憲","羅智強","牛煦庭","賴士葆","徐巧芯","洪孟楷","林淑芬","林岱樺","陳冠廷"],"page_start":64,"meetingDate":["2025-05-16"],"gazette_id":"1144801","agenda_lcidc_ids":["1144801_00002","1144801_00003"],"meet_name":"立法院第11屆第3會期第12次會議紀錄","content":"本院委員吳宗憲等52人擬具公投提案主文為：「您是否同意『各級法院合議庭法官判處死刑不須\n一致決』之政策？」請公決案─通過─","agenda_id":"1144801_00004"}}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}