{"error":false,"id":["161504"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":161504,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/161504","日期":"2025-05-16","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"院會-11-3-12","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第3會期第12次會議","屆":11,"會期":3,"會次":12,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"院會","標題":"第11屆第3會期第12次會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2025-05-16T16:07:56+08:00","結束時間":"2025-05-16T16:10:35+08:00","影片長度":"00:02:39","支援功能":["ai-transcript","gazette"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/fe07dedb5caff746a741aed5090638abb8e2d73ce5d96c5b4ebb0ed34a0e2cbcd6b39e882d62cf0b5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"王正旭","委員發言時間":"16:07:56 - 16:10:35","會議時間":"2025-05-16T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第3會期第12次會議（事由：一、討論事項：本院委員許宇甄、羅智強、葛如鈞等52人擬具公投提案主文為：「賴清德總統定位對岸為境外敵對勢力，人民擔心兩岸進入準戰爭狀態。你是否同意政府應避免戰爭，不讓台灣變成實施軍事戒嚴、青年喪命且家園被毀的烏克蘭？」請公決案等16案。二、5月16日上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。三、5月20日下午5時至6時為處理臨時提案時間。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":10.25721875,"end":14.594093750000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":14.982218750000001,"end":26.91284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":27.199718750000002,"end":30.43971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":30.92909375,"end":32.549093750000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":32.93721875,"end":34.337843750000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":34.658468750000004,"end":37.35846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":37.57784375,"end":43.922843750000006},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":44.159093750000004,"end":57.55784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":57.87846875,"end":60.42659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":60.51096875,"end":63.953468750000006},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":64.72971875,"end":65.55659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":66.18096875,"end":72.13784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":72.37409375,"end":76.76159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":76.94721875,"end":77.43659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":77.84159375,"end":80.40659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":80.60909375,"end":84.20346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":84.72659375,"end":85.24971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":85.72221875000001,"end":102.95159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":103.33971875,"end":110.34284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":110.76471875,"end":112.19909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":112.80659375,"end":115.08471875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":115.50659375000001,"end":115.99596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":116.38409375,"end":117.37971875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":117.44721875,"end":123.10034375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":123.89346875000001,"end":127.74096875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":127.89284375000001,"end":130.22159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":130.44096875,"end":131.89221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":132.12846875,"end":134.32221875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":134.72721875000002,"end":137.24159375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":137.86596875,"end":140.04284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":140.65034375000002,"end":142.00034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":142.11846875,"end":152.22659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":152.88471875000002,"end":155.34846875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":155.83784375000002,"end":157.40721875}],"whisperx":[{"start":10.281,"end":14.284,"text":"主席各位議員同仁各位國人同胞大家好"},{"start":15.506,"end":36.757,"text":"針對國民黨所提的今天的公投案我認為在法治上有以下的幾個問題首先依據我國憲法法庭113年憲判制第八號的判決主文第六點就已經寫得非常的清楚科處死刑的判決應經各級法院和議庭法官的一致決"},{"start":37.757,"end":63.651,"text":"這是非常清楚的事情而且我國是法治國家憲法判決具有具屬全國各機關及人民的效力我想在憲政權利分立及法治國的原則下我們作為立法委員更應該要遵守尊重憲法法庭的判決再來公投的議題屬於法律原則的創制公投必須在"},{"start":65.058,"end":83.94,"text":"憲法及法律秩序內部進行而且將來相關的政府部門依據公投結果制定的法律不得抵觸大法官憲制及憲法的基本原則所以此案若違背憲法層級的解釋即時通過了相關法律修正亦屬無效"},{"start":84.781,"end":110.073,"text":"而且合議制度的原則設計本來就是要保障司法判決是多元觀點與慎重考慮尤其在涉及死刑的重大案件上要求法官一致同意才可判處死刑是為了要確保國家不輕率剝奪人民的生命將死刑判決門檻降低至多數決反而可能會導致冤錯案件機率的上升"},{"start":111.014,"end":139.486,"text":"違背程序正義進而損害司法的信賴最後 死刑議題關係到最基本的人權的保障不應該被簡化為政治動員的手段死刑是一種國家權利對生命的最終剝奪應該有最嚴格的程序保障國民黨此次公投案試圖鬆綁司法合一的制度降低國家殺人的門檻"},{"start":141.707,"end":157.162,"text":"違憲違法違反情理實不可取我們呼籲全國國人基於對生命尊嚴的尊重對憲政體制的捍衛拒絕此一違憲背離司法正義的公投提案大罷免大成功"}]},"gazette":{"lineno":133,"blocks":[["王委員正旭：（16時8分）主席、各位立院同仁、各位國人同胞，大家好。針對國民黨今天所提的公投案，我認為在法制上有以下幾個問題：首先，依據我國憲法法庭113年憲判字第8號的判決，主文第六點就已經寫得非常清楚，科處死刑的判決，應經各級法院合議庭法官一致決，這是非常清楚的事情，而且我國是法治國家，憲法判決具有拘束全國各機關及人民的效力，我想在憲政權力分立及法治國的原則下，我們作為立法委員，更應該要遵守、尊重憲法法庭的判決。","再來，公投的議題屬於法律原則的創制，公投必須在憲法及法律秩序內部進行，而且將來相關的政府部門依據公投結果制定的法律，不得牴觸大法官的限制及憲法的基本原則，所以此案若違背憲法層級的解釋，即使通過了，相關法律修正亦屬無效。而且合議制度的設計，本來就是要保障司法判決之多元觀點與慎重考慮，尤其在涉及死刑的重大案件上，要求法官要一致同意才可判處死刑，是為了要確保國家不輕率剝奪人民的生命，將死刑判決門檻降低至多數決，反而可能會導致冤錯案件機率上升，違背程序正義，進而損害人民對司法的信賴。","最後，死刑議題關係到最基本人權的保障，不應該被簡化為政治動員的手段。死刑是一種國家權力對生命的最終剝奪，應該有最嚴格的程序保障，國民黨此次公投案試圖鬆綁司法合議的制度、降低國家殺人的門檻，違憲、違法、違反情理實不可取。我們呼籲全國國人，基於對生命尊嚴的尊重，對憲政體制的捍衛，拒絕此一違憲、背離司法正義的公投提案。大罷免，大成功！"],["主席：謝謝王委員。","下一位我們請陳秀寳委員發言。"]],"agenda":{"page_end":100,"meet_id":"院會-11-3-12","speakers":["韓國瑜","江啟臣","莊瑞雄","鍾佳濱","沈伯洋","王義川","黃捷","李柏毅","陳培瑜","蘇巧慧","沈發惠","吳思瑤","林楚茵","陳亭妃","賴瑞隆","張雅琳","李坤城","徐富癸","張宏陸","郭昱晴","郭國文","林月琴","陳俊宇","王美惠","林俊憲","劉建國","李昆澤","許智傑","林宜瑾","邱議瑩","王定宇","何欣純","陳瑩","黃秀芳","伍麗華Saidhai‧Tahovecahe","吳琪銘","羅美玲","陳素月","王正旭","陳秀寳","范雲","吳秉叡","賴惠員","邱志偉","陳昭姿","張啓楷","吳宗憲","羅智強","牛煦庭","賴士葆","徐巧芯","洪孟楷","林淑芬","林岱樺","陳冠廷"],"page_start":64,"meetingDate":["2025-05-16"],"gazette_id":"1144801","agenda_lcidc_ids":["1144801_00002","1144801_00003"],"meet_name":"立法院第11屆第3會期第12次會議紀錄","content":"本院委員吳宗憲等52人擬具公投提案主文為：「您是否同意『各級法院合議庭法官判處死刑不須\n一致決』之政策？」請公決案─通過─","agenda_id":"1144801_00004"}}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}