{"error":false,"id":["161514"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":161514,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/161514","日期":"2025-05-16","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"院會-11-3-12","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第3會期第12次會議","屆":11,"會期":3,"會次":12,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"院會","標題":"第11屆第3會期第12次會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2025-05-16T16:39:28+08:00","結束時間":"2025-05-16T16:42:29+08:00","影片長度":"00:03:01","支援功能":["ai-transcript","gazette"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/fe07dedb5caff746052e0f04965dc7b7b8e2d73ce5d96c5b4ebb0ed34a0e2cbc739c7deb8e227a905ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"牛煦庭","委員發言時間":"16:39:28 - 16:42:29","會議時間":"2025-05-16T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第3會期第12次會議（事由：一、討論事項：本院委員許宇甄、羅智強、葛如鈞等52人擬具公投提案主文為：「賴清德總統定位對岸為境外敵對勢力，人民擔心兩岸進入準戰爭狀態。你是否同意政府應避免戰爭，不讓台灣變成實施軍事戒嚴、青年喪命且家園被毀的烏克蘭？」請公決案等16案。二、5月16日上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。三、5月20日下午5時至6時為處理臨時提案時間。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":5.81909375,"end":6.61221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":7.152218750000001,"end":12.484718750000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":12.805343750000002,"end":18.660968750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":19.184093750000002,"end":26.59221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":27.06471875,"end":31.87409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":31.97534375,"end":34.42221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":35.02971875,"end":36.767843750000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":36.987218750000004,"end":49.05284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":49.829093750000006,"end":54.55409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":54.94221875,"end":58.266593750000006},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":58.705343750000004,"end":62.384093750000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":62.75534375,"end":63.126593750000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":63.58221875,"end":64.35846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":65.08409375000001,"end":66.82221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":67.29471875,"end":68.91471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":69.13409375,"end":71.46284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":71.76659375,"end":72.32346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":72.45846875000001,"end":78.46596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":78.73596875,"end":83.89971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":84.13596875,"end":86.19471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":86.41409375,"end":87.47721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":87.73034375,"end":90.58221875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":90.95346875,"end":96.84284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":97.38284375,"end":98.17596875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":98.56409375000001,"end":100.15034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":100.30221875000001,"end":103.93034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":104.41971875,"end":113.31284375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":113.70096875,"end":124.18034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":124.26471875000001,"end":125.86784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":126.32346875,"end":135.23346875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":135.82409375,"end":139.13159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":139.62096875,"end":143.26596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":143.73846875,"end":146.60721875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":146.99534375000002,"end":148.93596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":149.40846875,"end":159.63471875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":160.10721875000002,"end":165.27096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":165.60846875000001,"end":170.56971875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":170.82284375,"end":181.13346875000002}],"whisperx":[{"start":6.094,"end":33.588,"text":"謝謝主席今天我們聚集在此支持反廢死公投我們必須捍衛社會的公平與正義我們要先跟大家說說大搞實質廢死的憲判第八號是怎麼來的是民進黨在完全執政的時代輕易放行廢死大法官通過的一個結果總統提名的每位大法官都需要經過立法院的審查之後才通過然而在民進黨執政的時期"},{"start":35.749,"end":64.154,"text":"黨議是壓倒性的他們對於八成民意反對死刑的訴求置若罔聞在審查的過程中自甘淪為橡皮圖章以至於這批大法官欠缺真正的民意基礎在五大憲政機關中立法院是唯一受到人民直接選舉的機構立法委員每天傾聽民意並對選民負責立法委員的聲音本來就要貼近人民的心聲但司法"},{"start":65.134,"end":90.344,"text":"我們相信司法不應該是被害人追求正義的工具更是對社會秩序的信任因此在上一輪的大法官的投票是否廢死是在野力量把關的重要指標即便我們要被批評是毀線亂正甚至變成所謂大罷免的理由我們都要堅持原則因為我們清楚如果我們的司法體系失去了公信力"},{"start":91.244,"end":112.977,"text":"當政府無法為被害人伸張正義時,社會的公平正義也就無從談起。過去八年,民進黨大喊司法改革,卻讓人民對於司法的信任蕩然無存。他們透過大法官釋憲的方式,變相廢除死刑,完全違背人民對於公平正義的期待。"},{"start":113.797,"end":138.974,"text":"我們相信司法不應該成為政黨或是任何個人追求理想的工具它應該代表的是全體人民全體社會的公平正義民進黨過去的做法不僅未能推動司法的改革反而讓體系大幅倒退如果我們繼續無視人民對於司法不公的訴求跟怒火那恐怕司法的公信力將會進一步的消失"},{"start":139.69,"end":158.717,"text":"我更要強調維繫司法公信力的努力不只是立法委員的工作跟責任單靠我們是不夠的我們必須站出來讓全民共同支持反對實質廢死的公投讓人民的聲音至少有一個清楚表達的機會"},{"start":160.337,"end":180.943,"text":"讓我們滿漢無能的政府看到人民對於司法不公的焦慮讓我們的政府正視司法無法維持正義的警鐘如此才能讓真正的公平正義回到我們的社會讓我們一起努力為未來發聲為公平正義而戰謝謝大家"}]},"gazette":{"lineno":186,"blocks":[["牛委員煦庭：（16時39分）謝謝主席。今天我們聚集在此支持反廢死公投，我們必須捍衛社會的公平與正義，我們要先跟大家說說大搞實質廢死的憲判字第8號是怎麼來的，是民進黨在完全執政的時代，輕易放行廢死大法官通過的一個結果。總統提名的每位大法官都需要經過立法院的審查之後才通過，然而在民進黨執政時期，黨意是壓倒性的，他們對於八成民意反對死刑的訴求置若罔聞，在審查的過程中自甘淪為橡皮圖章，以至於這批大法官欠缺真正的民意基礎。","在五大憲政機關中，立法院是唯一受到人民直接選舉的機構，立法委員每天傾聽民意，並對選民負責，立法委員的聲音本來就要貼近人民的心聲。我們相信司法不應該是被害人追求正義的工具，更是對社會秩序的信任，因此在上一輪大法官投票，是否廢死是在野力量把關的重要指標，即便我們被批評是毀憲亂政，甚至變成所謂大罷免的理由，我們都要堅持原則！因為我們清楚，如果我們的司法體系失去了公信力，當政府無法為被害人伸張正義時，社會的公平正義也就無從談起。","過去八年，民進黨大喊司法改革，卻讓人民對於司法的信任蕩然無存。他們透過大法官釋憲的方式，變相廢除死刑，完全違背人民對於公平正義的期待。我們相信司法不應該成為政黨，或是任何個人追求理想的工具，它應該代表全體人民、全體社會的公平正義。民進黨過去的作法不僅未能推動司法改革，反而讓體系大幅倒退。如果我們繼續無視人民對於司法不公的訴求跟怒火，恐怕司法的公信力將會進一步消失。","我更要強調，維繫司法公信力的努力，不只是立法委員的工作跟責任，單靠我們是不夠的，我們必須站出來，讓全民共同支持反對實質廢死的公投，讓人民的聲音至少有一個清楚表達的機會，讓我們顢頇無能的政府看到人民對於司法不公的焦慮，讓我們的政府正視司法無法維持正義的警鐘，如此才能讓真正的公平正義回到我們的社會。讓我們一起努力為未來發聲，為公平正義而戰，謝謝大家。"],["主席：謝謝牛委員。","接下來請賴士葆委員發言。"]],"agenda":{"page_end":100,"meet_id":"院會-11-3-12","speakers":["韓國瑜","江啟臣","莊瑞雄","鍾佳濱","沈伯洋","王義川","黃捷","李柏毅","陳培瑜","蘇巧慧","沈發惠","吳思瑤","林楚茵","陳亭妃","賴瑞隆","張雅琳","李坤城","徐富癸","張宏陸","郭昱晴","郭國文","林月琴","陳俊宇","王美惠","林俊憲","劉建國","李昆澤","許智傑","林宜瑾","邱議瑩","王定宇","何欣純","陳瑩","黃秀芳","伍麗華Saidhai‧Tahovecahe","吳琪銘","羅美玲","陳素月","王正旭","陳秀寳","范雲","吳秉叡","賴惠員","邱志偉","陳昭姿","張啓楷","吳宗憲","羅智強","牛煦庭","賴士葆","徐巧芯","洪孟楷","林淑芬","林岱樺","陳冠廷"],"page_start":64,"meetingDate":["2025-05-16"],"gazette_id":"1144801","agenda_lcidc_ids":["1144801_00002","1144801_00003"],"meet_name":"立法院第11屆第3會期第12次會議紀錄","content":"本院委員吳宗憲等52人擬具公投提案主文為：「您是否同意『各級法院合議庭法官判處死刑不須\n一致決』之政策？」請公決案─通過─","agenda_id":"1144801_00004"}}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}