{"error":false,"id":["161859"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":161859,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/161859","日期":"2025-05-23","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"院會-11-3-13","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第3會期第13次會議","屆":11,"會期":3,"會次":13,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"院會","標題":"第11屆第3會期第13次會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2025-05-23T14:44:44+08:00","結束時間":"2025-05-23T14:47:59+08:00","影片長度":"00:03:15","支援功能":["ai-transcript","gazette"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/f6b7147a760cfa56cd02d653f034b52ccbc36a90db5ea655baeadb61c4f5613eb88d7f28b768b82a5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"吳思瑤","委員發言時間":"14:44:44 - 14:47:59","會議時間":"2025-05-23T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第3會期第13次會議（事由：一、討論事項：本院國民黨黨團，針對第11屆第3會期第9次會議報告事項第2案「總統咨，為司法院大法官含院長、副院長，現有缺額7名，茲依據中華民國憲法增修條文第5條規定，提名蔡秋明、蘇素娥、蕭文生、鄭純惠、林麗瑩、陳慈陽、詹鎮榮7位為司法院大法官，並以蔡秋明為院長、蘇素娥為副院長，咨請同意案。」院會所作之決定提出復議。是否有當？請公決案等18案。二、5月23日上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。三、5月27日下午5時至6時為處理臨時提案時間。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":3.96284375,"end":6.98346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":7.371593750000001,"end":14.121593750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":14.594093750000003,"end":28.95471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":29.157218750000002,"end":36.70034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":36.970343750000005,"end":41.712218750000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":42.18471875,"end":42.94409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":43.80471875,"end":59.80221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":60.02159375,"end":73.13346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":73.75784375,"end":79.66409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":79.88346875,"end":100.48784375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":100.99409375,"end":110.22471875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":110.35971875000001,"end":113.32971875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":113.93721875000001,"end":116.26596875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":116.89034375000001,"end":121.63221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":122.03721875000001,"end":125.71596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":126.28971875,"end":130.33971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":130.87971875,"end":133.74846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":134.17034375,"end":137.56221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":137.95034375,"end":143.41784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":143.73846875,"end":164.02221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":164.88284375,"end":175.75034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":165.94596875000002,"end":166.70534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":176.18909375,"end":177.25221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":177.65721875,"end":178.83846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":179.14221875,"end":181.03221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":181.36971875,"end":186.46596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":187.54596875000001,"end":193.62096875}],"whisperx":[{"start":4.168,"end":28.323,"text":"主席各位同仁冤有頭債有主立法院自己在違憲現在反來說依法行政的行政院在違法我們現在所審查的是民眾黨提出來的決議案就是藍白想要洗白自己二砍總預算的罪行想要甩鍋賴給清德問題是來得及嗎回得去嗎"},{"start":29.304,"end":41.024,"text":"早知如此何必當初當初如果沒有二砍總預算種下惡因就不會有今天的苦果而且如果當初支持總預算的復議案就可以撥亂反正現在"},{"start":44.154,"end":72.616,"text":"總預算二月份就三讀通過但是已經五月底了立法院要用一個決議案來推翻自己的總預算審查自己推翻自己藍白打臉藍白程序上毫不正當決議案的效力並沒有辦法來凌駕總預算的審查結果立法院再大也不能夠把審查總預算當做小孩玩遊戲說不算就不算說重來就重來"},{"start":73.997,"end":100.007,"text":"預算就是民生不要報復自己的國家不要懲罰自己的人民藍白的委員今天站上來說的每一句話都是在漂白自己的罪行而這每一句話民進黨的委員在審查總預算的時候我們都說過都提醒過都苦苦哀求過可是藍白當家的立法院不理會不屑一顧"},{"start":101.047,"end":125.463,"text":"还记得1月20号彻夜表决总预算通过的那一天蓝白的委员全场欢呼欢欣鼓舞觉得他们成功了确实成功山道让国人有感菩萨为因众生为果黄国昌说山预算一定让国人有感现在应验了地方首长要算账请找自家的立委"},{"start":126.343,"end":143.069,"text":"居然今天還在造謠看看我這邊的大字報行政院完全是依法執行尊重立法院三讀通過的總預算案自行調整6361是立法院的要求行政院沒有違法"},{"start":143.829,"end":163.777,"text":"而且预算权就是行政权中央依法有裁量权依据的是地方制度法69条跟裁划法30条而裁划法一直到新法是今年的3月才通过上路但是预算早在2月就公告了并没有办法适用今年的新的裁划法"},{"start":164.497,"end":193.24,"text":"而行政院保留了173億社福不受影響教育不受影響不是藍白造謠的在懲罰地方最後我要說自己在違憲現在來罵別人違法完全就只是要洗白自己的罪行民進黨沒有辦法接受謝謝吳思瑤委員的發言接下來我們請陳秀寶委員發言葛如君委員請準備"}]},"gazette":{"lineno":28,"blocks":[["吳委員思瑤：（14時44分）主席、各位同仁。冤有頭、債有主，立法院自己在違憲，現在反過來說依法行政的行政院在違法。我們現在所審查的是民眾黨提出來的決議案，就是藍白想要洗白自己惡砍總預算的罪行，想要甩鍋、「賴」給「清德」，問題是來得及嗎？回得去嗎？早知如此，何必當初？當初如果沒有惡砍總預算種下惡因，就不會有今天的苦果，而且如果當初支持總預算的覆議案就可以撥亂反正。總預算1月份就三讀通過，但是已經5月底了，立法院要用一個決議案來推翻自己的總預算審查，自己推翻自己，藍白打臉藍白，程序上毫不正當！","決議案的效力並沒有辦法凌駕總預算的審查結果，立法院再大也不能夠把審查總預算當作小孩玩遊戲，說不算就不算、說重來就重來。預算就是民生，不要報復自己的國家、不要懲罰自己的人民。藍白的委員今天站上來說的每一句話，都是在漂白自己的罪行，而這每一句話，民進黨委員在審查總預算的時候都說過、都提醒過、都苦苦哀求過，可是藍白當家的立法院不理會、不屑一顧。還記得1月20號徹夜表決總預算通過的那一天，藍白的委員全場歡呼、歡欣鼓舞，覺得他們成功了，確實成功刪到讓國人有感。菩薩為因，眾生為果，黃國昌說刪預算一定讓國人有感，現在應驗了。地方首長要算帳，請找自家的立委。","居然今天還在造謠！看看我這邊的大字報，行政院完全是依法執行，尊重立法院三讀通過的總預算案，自行調整636億是立法院的要求，行政院沒有違法，而且預算權就是行政權，中央依法有裁量權，依據的是地方制度法第六十九條跟財劃法第三十條，財劃法新法一直到今年3月才通過上路，但是預算早在2月就公告了，並沒有辦法適用今年新修的財劃法，而行政院保留了173億預算，讓社福不受影響、教育不受影響，不是藍白造謠的在懲罰地方！","最後我要說，自己在違憲，現在來罵別人違法，完全就只是要洗白自己的罪行，民進黨沒有辦法接受！"],["主席：謝謝吳思瑤委員的發言。","接下來請陳秀寳委員發言。葛如鈞委員請準備。"]],"agenda":{"page_end":84,"meet_id":"院會-11-3-13","speakers":["韓國瑜","黃珊珊","徐巧芯","張嘉郡","吳宗憲","陳菁徽","廖先翔","王鴻薇","黃國昌","羅廷瑋","李彥秀","麥玉珍","林國成","張啓楷","翁曉玲","謝龍介","黃建賓","賴士葆","吳思瑤","陳秀寳","葛如鈞","陳培瑜","陳冠廷","蔡易餘","陳素月","葉元之","張雅琳","郭昱晴","許宇甄","林月琴","林岱樺","王義川","徐富癸","黃秀芳","吳秉叡","郭國文","伍麗華Saidhai‧Tahovecahe","陳俊宇","沈發惠","賴惠員","羅美玲","王美惠","柯志恩","何欣純","莊瑞雄","賴瑞隆","馬文君","林宜瑾","吳琪銘","許智傑","邱議瑩","王定宇","林俊憲","李柏毅","徐欣瑩","蘇巧慧","羅明才","黃健豪","鄭正鈐"],"page_start":41,"meetingDate":["2025-05-23"],"gazette_id":"1145001","agenda_lcidc_ids":["1145001_00002","1145001_00003"],"meet_name":"立法院第11屆第3會期第13次會議紀錄","content":"本院台灣民眾黨黨團，建請院會作成決議：「行政院主計總處應依立法院審議中華民國114年度\n中央政府總預算案通案刪減之決議意旨，由中央各機關及所屬編列之預算刪減調整，並立即將一\n般性補助款足額撥付予地方政府。」是否有當？請公決案─通過─","agenda_id":"1145001_00004"}}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}