{"error":false,"id":["161863"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":161863,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/161863","日期":"2025-05-23","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"院會-11-3-13","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第3會期第13次會議","屆":11,"會期":3,"會次":13,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"院會","標題":"第11屆第3會期第13次會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2025-05-23T14:58:00+08:00","結束時間":"2025-05-23T15:00:48+08:00","影片長度":"00:02:48","支援功能":["ai-transcript","gazette"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/f6b7147a760cfa56d873fa208ae26c42cbc36a90db5ea655baeadb61c4f5613e280ecaa5b1202abe5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"陳冠廷","委員發言時間":"14:58:00 - 15:00:48","會議時間":"2025-05-23T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第3會期第13次會議（事由：一、討論事項：本院國民黨黨團，針對第11屆第3會期第9次會議報告事項第2案「總統咨，為司法院大法官含院長、副院長，現有缺額7名，茲依據中華民國憲法增修條文第5條規定，提名蔡秋明、蘇素娥、蕭文生、鄭純惠、林麗瑩、陳慈陽、詹鎮榮7位為司法院大法官，並以蔡秋明為院長、蘇素娥為副院長，咨請同意案。」院會所作之決定提出復議。是否有當？請公決案等18案。二、5月23日上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。三、5月27日下午5時至6時為處理臨時提案時間。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":0.03096875,"end":6.88221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":7.11846875,"end":10.054718750000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":10.662218750000001,"end":16.39971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":16.77096875,"end":18.30659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":18.610343750000002,"end":22.42409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":23.11596875,"end":30.23721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":30.74346875,"end":32.127218750000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":32.53221875,"end":36.91971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":37.189718750000004,"end":38.89409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":40.00784375,"end":43.14659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":43.70346875,"end":45.407843750000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":46.133468750000006,"end":50.976593750000006},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":52.056593750000005,"end":58.65471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":58.85721875,"end":64.17284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":64.52721875,"end":65.05034375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":65.40471875,"end":68.67846875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":68.94846875,"end":70.55159375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":70.82159375,"end":71.96909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":73.15034375,"end":77.79096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":78.04409375,"end":79.29284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":79.78221875,"end":81.35159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":81.58784375,"end":84.05159375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":84.40596875,"end":87.89909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":88.32096875,"end":96.87659375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":97.04534375,"end":102.88409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":103.66034375000001,"end":105.02721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":105.06096875,"end":108.23346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":108.38534375,"end":120.34971875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":120.38346875,"end":123.92721875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":124.39971875,"end":126.32346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":127.36971875,"end":130.35659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":130.67721875,"end":132.28034375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":132.70221875000001,"end":139.72221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":139.90784375,"end":147.16409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":147.97409375,"end":150.10034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":150.23534375,"end":158.26784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":159.43221875,"end":161.92971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":161.96346875,"end":161.98034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":162.06471875,"end":166.41846875000002}],"whisperx":[{"start":0.089,"end":22.28,"text":"相信大家還記得今年初我們審議中央政府總預算的時候那時候在野黨是擁多數的優勢那史無前例的三減了2075億元其中通案三減是939億元更要求行政院自行三減636億確實讓大家很有感只是這個有感相信地方政府還有人民都很難以接受"},{"start":23.36,"end":50.545,"text":"當中央政府的預算被大幅刪減行政院就必須要在有限的資源下去調整分配這難道不是必然的結果嗎那就像一個家庭當收入減少的時候他必須要調整各項支出這是一個再簡單不過的道理各位地方首長感受到預算的短缺的壓力我們完全能夠感同身受而中央政府面臨史上最大幅度的預算刪減也是同樣的處境"},{"start":52.096,"end":71.542,"text":"地方預算它是不斷的在增加但是少了輔助盤就很難以去做更完善的施政那中央預算一下子被刪掉兩千多億元再沒有正當性指出哪些預算福邊難道毫無道理的統三了六百多億對於政務推動的難度不會更加嚴峻嗎"},{"start":73.186,"end":102.746,"text":"更重要的是主計總署早在去年8月就已經含之我們各縣市政府如果立法院的審議結果有所刪減就必須要配合調整這不是突如其來的決定它是依法行政的結果根據地方制度法還有財政收支劃分法中央政府具有輔助管的採樣權所以是去年就知道的當我們去年就知道的事情為什麼我們那個時候不能夠在整個國會不分朝野一起來做修正呢"},{"start":103.726,"end":126.201,"text":"当时各方已经提醒预算不是不能删但是要删的有道理可是在当时一片混乱下通过哪里计算究竟删除了什么的总预算原本还有机会借由行政院的赋予来去考量预算删减的合理性可是在等还是不愿意正式造成的问题所以才会有现在的结果"},{"start":127.541,"end":146.65,"text":"預算審查是立法院我們的重要職責我們必須要審慎為之不要為了政治上去然後來去罔顧施政的需要不能夠只思考製造對立卻忘記人民的福祉預算審查它不是政治表演它是攸關國家運作人民生活的很嚴肅的工作我要在這邊呼籲"},{"start":148.018,"end":158.13,"text":"我们有过去的这样子的经验之后,未来在审查预算的时候,请记取今天的教训。我们回归理性,以国家整体利益为依据。谢谢大家。"}]},"gazette":{"lineno":49,"blocks":[["陳委員冠廷：（14時57分）主席、各位同仁。相信大家還記得今年初我們審議中央政府總預算的時候，當時在野黨以多數的優勢，史無前例的刪減了2,075億元，其中通案刪減939億元，更要求行政院自行刪減636億，確實讓大家很有感，只是這個有感相信地方政府及人民都很難以接受。當中央政府的預算被大幅刪減，行政院就必須在有限的資源下去調整分配，這難道不是必然的結果嗎？就像一個家庭，當收入減少的時候，就必須調整各項支出，這是一個再簡單不過的道理。","各位地方首長感受到預算短缺的壓力，我們完全能夠感同身受，而中央政府面臨史上最大幅度的預算刪減也是同樣的處境，地方預算是不斷在增加，少了補助款就很難去做更完善的施政，而中央預算一下子被刪掉兩千多億元，在沒有正當性的指出哪些預算浮編，就毫無道理的統刪了六百多億，難道政務推動的難度不會更加嚴峻嗎？更重要的是，主計總處早在去年8月就已經函知各縣市政府，如果立法院的審議結果有所刪減，就必須要配合調整，這不是突如其來的決定，它是依法行政的結果。","根據地方制度法及財政收支劃分法，中央政府具有補助款的裁量權，這是去年就知道的，既然是去年就知道的事情，為什麼那個時候不能夠在國會不分朝野一起來修正呢？當時各方已經提醒預算不是不能刪，但是要刪得有道理，可是在當時一片混亂下，通過難以計算究竟刪除了什麼的總預算，原本還有機會藉由行政院的覆議去考量預算刪減的合理性，可是在野黨還是不願意正視造成的問題，所以才會有現在的結果。","預算審查是立法院的重要職責，我們必須要審慎為之，不要為了政治算計而罔顧施政的需要，不能夠只思考製造對立，卻忘記人民的福祉。預算審查不是政治表演，而是攸關國家運作、人民生活很嚴肅的工作。","我要在這邊呼籲，我們有過去這樣的經驗之後，未來在審查預算的時候，請記取今天的教訓，要回歸理性，以國家整體利益為依據。謝謝大家。"],["主席：謝謝陳冠廷委員的發言。","接下來請蔡易餘委員發言，陳素月委員請準備。"]],"agenda":{"page_end":84,"meet_id":"院會-11-3-13","speakers":["韓國瑜","黃珊珊","徐巧芯","張嘉郡","吳宗憲","陳菁徽","廖先翔","王鴻薇","黃國昌","羅廷瑋","李彥秀","麥玉珍","林國成","張啓楷","翁曉玲","謝龍介","黃建賓","賴士葆","吳思瑤","陳秀寳","葛如鈞","陳培瑜","陳冠廷","蔡易餘","陳素月","葉元之","張雅琳","郭昱晴","許宇甄","林月琴","林岱樺","王義川","徐富癸","黃秀芳","吳秉叡","郭國文","伍麗華Saidhai‧Tahovecahe","陳俊宇","沈發惠","賴惠員","羅美玲","王美惠","柯志恩","何欣純","莊瑞雄","賴瑞隆","馬文君","林宜瑾","吳琪銘","許智傑","邱議瑩","王定宇","林俊憲","李柏毅","徐欣瑩","蘇巧慧","羅明才","黃健豪","鄭正鈐"],"page_start":41,"meetingDate":["2025-05-23"],"gazette_id":"1145001","agenda_lcidc_ids":["1145001_00002","1145001_00003"],"meet_name":"立法院第11屆第3會期第13次會議紀錄","content":"本院台灣民眾黨黨團，建請院會作成決議：「行政院主計總處應依立法院審議中華民國114年度\n中央政府總預算案通案刪減之決議意旨，由中央各機關及所屬編列之預算刪減調整，並立即將一\n般性補助款足額撥付予地方政府。」是否有當？請公決案─通過─","agenda_id":"1145001_00004"}}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}