{"error":false,"id":["161885"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":161885,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/161885","日期":"2025-05-23","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"院會-11-3-13","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第3會期第13次會議","屆":11,"會期":3,"會次":13,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"院會","標題":"第11屆第3會期第13次會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2025-05-23T16:18:47+08:00","結束時間":"2025-05-23T16:22:06+08:00","影片長度":"00:03:19","支援功能":["ai-transcript","gazette"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/f6b7147a760cfa56c3cd7436dd4c8946cbc36a90db5ea655fc2e04bd2aa77c24efb3babcbf3bc8885ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"何欣純","委員發言時間":"16:18:47 - 16:22:06","會議時間":"2025-05-23T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第3會期第13次會議（事由：一、討論事項：本院國民黨黨團，針對第11屆第3會期第9次會議報告事項第2案「總統咨，為司法院大法官含院長、副院長，現有缺額7名，茲依據中華民國憲法增修條文第5條規定，提名蔡秋明、蘇素娥、蕭文生、鄭純惠、林麗瑩、陳慈陽、詹鎮榮7位為司法院大法官，並以蔡秋明為院長、蘇素娥為副院長，咨請同意案。」院會所作之決定提出復議。是否有當？請公決案等18案。二、5月23日上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。三、5月27日下午5時至6時為處理臨時提案時間。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":1.98846875,"end":12.855968750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":13.800968750000003,"end":19.184093750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":19.47096875,"end":22.930343750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":23.16659375,"end":27.75659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":27.891593750000002,"end":34.877843750000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":35.45159375,"end":36.70034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":37.915343750000005,"end":42.08346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":42.43784375,"end":53.76096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":54.31784375,"end":61.35471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":61.67534375,"end":65.62409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":66.07971875,"end":82.19534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":82.41471875,"end":90.75096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":91.52721875,"end":92.38784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":92.53971875,"end":102.02346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":102.78284375000001,"end":117.00846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":117.53159375000001,"end":119.30346875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":120.13034375000001,"end":130.57596875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":131.26784375,"end":143.36721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":144.64971875,"end":145.44284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":145.78034375000001,"end":147.11346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":147.73784375,"end":151.01159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":151.65284375000002,"end":152.27721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":153.05346875,"end":155.98971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":156.46221875,"end":157.23846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":157.93034375000002,"end":158.63909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":158.97659375,"end":160.24221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":161.86221875,"end":162.62159375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":162.68909375,"end":163.78596875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":164.30909375000002,"end":164.93346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":165.38909375,"end":171.90284375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":173.52284375000002,"end":174.68721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":174.73784375000002,"end":175.93596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":177.50534375,"end":180.86346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":181.36971875,"end":183.14159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":183.49596875,"end":186.41534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":190.53284375,"end":193.33409375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":193.63784375,"end":198.48096875000002}],"whisperx":[{"start":2.268,"end":12.218,"text":"藍白在野亂山總預算是事實再強調一次藍白亂山總預算是事實再怎麼野蠻也不能亂砍預算這句話我想大家應該還記得台灣過去也曾出現過潮小野大的情況"},{"start":23.268,"end":34.313,"text":"但是後來人民用選票來表達強烈的抗議20年後再也難白在國會多數今年出非理性的三減總預算再怎麼野蠻"},{"start":37.947,"end":53.497,"text":"也不能亂改預算這句話又發生在現在了而且比起過去三的更沒有道理三的數字砍的數字是更多更狠所以行政院迫不得已調整地方一般性的補助款"},{"start":54.398,"end":63.866,"text":"我也可以想見在野一定又把責任推給別人說中央懲罰地方果不其然藍營的地方首長都跳出來說話中央刪減一般性補助款都沒有來跟地方商量讓地方的預算受到很大的排擠來統刪地方預算會讓外界誤以為中央是否將預算被刪減的不滿找地方政府出氣"},{"start":82.721,"end":101.698,"text":"這些都是藍營的地方政府又把責任推給別人 推給中央但是大家有記憶的台灣的人民眼睛是雪亮的事出必有因 有因才有果現在藍白反過來倒果為因"},{"start":103.079,"end":118.851,"text":"過去要不是藍白聯手在立法院非理性的胡亂的提案說要統三預算又強行否決了行政院提出復議案的因怎麼會出現現在這樣的果呢此外我舉台中為例"},{"start":121.089,"end":142.01,"text":"2023年2月的時候當中央收到超出預計的稅收他願意與地方共享撥給台中75億當時盧秀燕市長宣布說24億要給25個學校蓋活動中心禮堂到現在還一直風光的在舉辦開工典禮"},{"start":145.104,"end":170.795,"text":"當時候大家同一鍋飯中央跟地方願意一起合作努力共好但是盧市長從來不提這是中央撥的現在現在他跳出來說中央不給地方錢那當中央預算被藍白亂砍大砍的時候他不說一句話他靜悄悄"},{"start":173.544,"end":198.101,"text":"昨天宴會 盧市長說如果不會做事就下台大批中央但是我要反問盧市長你台中市總預算達到歷史新高好 謝謝何新淳委員的發言接下來我們請莊瑞雄委員發言賴瑞龍委員請準備"}]},"gazette":{"lineno":163,"blocks":[["何委員欣純：（16時18分）藍白在野亂刪總預算是事實，再強調一次，藍白亂刪總預算是事實，藍白亂刪總預算是事實。「再怎麼野蠻也不能亂砍預算」，這句話我想大家應該還記得。臺灣過去也曾出現朝小野大的情況，但是後來人民用選票來表達強烈的抗議，20年後在野藍白在國會多數，今年初非理性的刪減總預算，再怎麼野蠻也不能亂砍預算，這句話又發生在現在了，而且比起過去刪的更沒有道理，刪的數字、砍的數字是更多、更狠，所以行政院迫不得已調整地方一般性的補助款。","我也可以想見在野一定又把責任推給別人，說中央懲罰地方，果不其然，藍營的地方首長都跳出來說話，中央刪減一般性補助款都沒有跟地方商量，讓地方預算受到很大的排擠；統刪地方預算會讓外界誤以為中央是否將預算被刪減的不滿找地方政府出氣，這些都是藍營的地方政府又把責任推給別人、推給中央。但大家是有記憶的，臺灣人民的眼睛是雪亮的，事出必有因，有因才有果，現在藍白反過來倒果為因，過去要不是藍白聯手在立法院非理性的胡亂提案要統刪預算，又強行否決行政院提出覆議案的因，怎麼會出現現在這樣的果呢？","此外，我舉臺中為例，2023年2月的時候，當中央收到超出預計的稅收，中央願意與地方共享，撥給臺中75億。當時盧秀燕市長宣布：24億要給25個學校蓋活動中心、禮堂，到現在還一直風光的在舉辦開工典禮，當時大家吃同一鍋飯，中央跟地方願意一起合作、努力共好，但盧市長從來不提這是中央撥的，現在他跳出來說中央不給地方錢，當中央預算被藍白亂砍、大砍的時候，他不說一句話，他靜悄悄。","昨天院會，盧市長說：如果不會做事就下臺。大批中央，但是我要反問盧市長，臺中市總預算達到歷史新高還做不了事嗎？如果做不了，就換人做。"],["主席：謝謝何欣純委員的發言。","接下來請莊瑞雄委員發言，賴瑞隆委員請準備。"]],"agenda":{"page_end":84,"meet_id":"院會-11-3-13","speakers":["韓國瑜","黃珊珊","徐巧芯","張嘉郡","吳宗憲","陳菁徽","廖先翔","王鴻薇","黃國昌","羅廷瑋","李彥秀","麥玉珍","林國成","張啓楷","翁曉玲","謝龍介","黃建賓","賴士葆","吳思瑤","陳秀寳","葛如鈞","陳培瑜","陳冠廷","蔡易餘","陳素月","葉元之","張雅琳","郭昱晴","許宇甄","林月琴","林岱樺","王義川","徐富癸","黃秀芳","吳秉叡","郭國文","伍麗華Saidhai‧Tahovecahe","陳俊宇","沈發惠","賴惠員","羅美玲","王美惠","柯志恩","何欣純","莊瑞雄","賴瑞隆","馬文君","林宜瑾","吳琪銘","許智傑","邱議瑩","王定宇","林俊憲","李柏毅","徐欣瑩","蘇巧慧","羅明才","黃健豪","鄭正鈐"],"page_start":41,"meetingDate":["2025-05-23"],"gazette_id":"1145001","agenda_lcidc_ids":["1145001_00002","1145001_00003"],"meet_name":"立法院第11屆第3會期第13次會議紀錄","content":"本院台灣民眾黨黨團，建請院會作成決議：「行政院主計總處應依立法院審議中華民國114年度\n中央政府總預算案通案刪減之決議意旨，由中央各機關及所屬編列之預算刪減調整，並立即將一\n般性補助款足額撥付予地方政府。」是否有當？請公決案─通過─","agenda_id":"1145001_00004"}}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}