{"error":false,"id":["162344"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":162344,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/162344","日期":"2025-06-10","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"院會-11-3-15","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第3會期第15次會議","屆":11,"會期":3,"會次":15,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"院會","標題":"第11屆第3會期第15次會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2025-06-10T09:02:07+08:00","結束時間":"2025-06-10T09:05:28+08:00","影片長度":"00:03:21","支援功能":["ai-transcript","gazette"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/a13cf9bd1947b862ba48409d17a5a07753217367b42f8fa25db4b3bfdff01bb2dff46f77a105961a5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"王定宇","委員發言時間":"09:02:07 - 09:05:28","會議時間":"2025-06-10T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第3會期第15次會議（事由：一、討論事項：本院民進黨黨團，針對第11屆第3會期第13次會議報告事項第374案院會所作將委員吳宗憲等17人、委員賴士葆等28人、委員楊瓊瓔等26人分別擬具「人工智慧基本法草案」及台灣民眾黨黨團擬具「人工智慧發展及管理條例草案」等4案，均改交教育及文化、交通兩委員會審查之決定，提出復議。是否有當？請公決案9案。二、6月6日上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。三、6月10日下午5時至6時為處理臨時提案時間。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":19.96034375,"end":21.141593750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":22.17096875,"end":23.16659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":23.79096875,"end":27.01409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":27.50346875,"end":30.13596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":30.65909375,"end":38.16846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":39.02909375,"end":40.42971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":40.49721875,"end":45.45846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":46.16721875,"end":47.837843750000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":48.32721875,"end":57.60846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":58.182218750000004,"end":59.68409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":60.291593750000004,"end":63.008468750000006},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":63.41346875000001,"end":64.54409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":64.93221875,"end":75.20909375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":75.66471875,"end":76.32284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":77.53784375000001,"end":79.24221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":79.66409375,"end":84.54096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":85.03034375,"end":103.74471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":104.06534375000001,"end":116.18159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":116.56971875,"end":118.44284375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":118.83096875000001,"end":123.38721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":123.92721875000001,"end":127.63971875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":128.11221875,"end":158.95971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":159.38159375,"end":163.76909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":163.95471875,"end":167.58284375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":168.61221875,"end":178.24784375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":178.58534375000002,"end":180.39096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":180.69471875000002,"end":181.96034375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":182.14596875,"end":187.14096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":187.47846875000002,"end":189.04784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":190.27971875,"end":193.75596875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":194.46471875,"end":200.69159375}],"whisperx":[{"start":20.364,"end":20.845,"text":"各位同仁,"},{"start":22.213,"end":45.248,"text":"我們的認同國軍弟兄二十四小時保家衛國待遇應該合理適度的調升我們也了解為了提高流營率以及新招募的成效待遇提高確實是方法之一那除了待遇以外訓練跟裝備也是流營相當重要的因素"},{"start":46.209,"end":74.314,"text":"我個人長期主張國防不應該拿來做政黨之間競爭的因素因為國防不分黨派國軍保護的對象更是不分黨派首先就待遇來講我們最近在2025年4月1號由顧立雄部長在去年國防委員會承諾要提出調整國軍待遇方案而待遇方案已經在4月1號實施"},{"start":75.794,"end":84.119,"text":"其中最多在整體薪資方面可以增加到一萬兩千元"},{"start":85.117,"end":109.347,"text":"以個別的單兵或者軍事官來說4月1號以後原來志願役的二兵起薪從三萬六變成四萬一若在戰鬥兵種戰鬥加級加上去剛任職的二兵可以領五萬三千元哨衛從原來的五萬兩千元調高到五萬七千元起薪"},{"start":110.087,"end":127.48,"text":"加上戰鬥加擠一個出任官的哨位可以領到六萬九千元這待遇高嗎我不認為但是待遇合不合理我們如果看歷年調整的比例民進黨執政的政府是最照顧國軍的政府"},{"start":128.16,"end":149.01,"text":"以整體軍公教調薪來講蔡英文政府分別調整三次3% 4% 4%賴清德政府一就任2025年1月調整3%在軍人的各項加擠地域加擠2017年調整30%專業加擠從像電針從原來的1100元調整到6600元後續還有戰鬥部隊加擠士官領導加擠等等"},{"start":157.614,"end":165.764,"text":"所以這幾年將近十年的時間我們持續的調整國軍的待遇有人說那我們給他三萬吧我們給他兩萬吧"},{"start":168.646,"end":188.915,"text":"我們在場有很多服過役的好朋友我昨天剛從飛訊部回來裡面一個飛官說人人都希望把薪資越高越好但是薪資不應該瞞天喊價不要把國軍放在政治鬥爭的第一線更不應該當作反罷免的遮羞布"},{"start":190.336,"end":199.943,"text":"如果由立法院單方向的調整薪資待遇恐有違憲之餘把國軍放到這個境地是不適合的請各位三思 謝謝"}]},"gazette":{"lineno":77,"blocks":[["王委員定宇：（9時2分）各位同仁，我們都認同，國軍弟兄24小時保家衛國，待遇應該合理適度的調升，我們也了解，為了提高留營率以及新招募的成效，待遇提高確實是方法之一，除了待遇以外，訓練跟裝備也是留營相當重要的因素，我個人長期主張國防不應該拿來做政黨之間的競爭，因為國防不分黨派，國軍保護的對象更是不分黨派。","首先就待遇來講，去年由顧立雄部長在國防委員會承諾要提出調整國軍待遇方案，而待遇方案已經在2025年4月1號實施，其中在整體薪資方面，最多可以增加到1萬2,000元，以個別的單兵或者軍士官來說，4月1號以後，原來志願役的二兵起薪從3萬6,000元變成4萬1,000元，若在戰鬥兵種，戰鬥加給加上去，剛任職的二兵可以領5萬3,000元，少尉的起薪從原來的5萬2,000元調高到5萬7,000元，加上戰鬥加給，一個初任官的少尉可以領到6萬9,000元，這待遇高嗎？我不認為，但是待遇合不合理？我們若看歷年調整的比例，民進黨執政的政府是最照顧國軍的政府，以整體軍公教調薪來講，蔡英文政府分別調整三次，3%、4%、4%，賴清德政府一就任，2025年1月調整3%；在軍人的各項加給，地域加給2017年調整30%，專業加給的部分，像電偵加給從原來的1,100元調整到6,600元，後續還有戰鬥部隊加給、士官領導加給等等，所以這幾年，將近十年的時間我們持續的調整國軍的待遇。","有人說，那我們給他3萬吧！我們給他2萬吧！在場有很多服過役的好朋友，我昨天剛從飛訓部回來，裡面一個飛官說，人人都希望薪資越高越好，但是薪資不應該漫天喊價，不要把國軍放在政治鬥爭的第一線，更不應該當作反罷免的遮羞布。如果由立法院單方向的調整薪資待遇，恐有違憲之虞，把國軍放到這個境地是不適合的，請各位三思，謝謝。"],["主席：謝謝王定宇委員的發言。","接下來請徐巧芯委員發言，林憶君委員請準備。"]],"agenda":{"page_end":225,"meet_id":"院會-11-3-15","speakers":["韓國瑜","王定宇","徐巧芯","林憶君","沈伯洋","王鴻薇","林楚茵","牛煦庭","陳冠廷","翁曉玲","陳俊宇","黃健豪","王義川","許宇甄","莊瑞雄","黃建賓","鍾佳濱","李彥秀","羅美玲","廖偉翔","吳思瑤","羅廷瑋"],"page_start":193,"meetingDate":["2025-06-10"],"gazette_id":"1145501","agenda_lcidc_ids":["1145501_00003"],"meet_name":"立法院第11屆第3會期第15次會議紀錄","content":"討論事項\n軍人待遇條例修正第五條條文─完成三讀─","agenda_id":"1145501_00005"}}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}