{"error":false,"id":["165639"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":165639,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/165639","日期":"2025-11-19","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"聯席會議-11-4-26,36-1","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第4會期社會福利及衛生環境、司法及法制委員會第1次聯席會議","屆":11,"會期":4,"會次":1,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"聯席會議","委員會代碼":[26,36],"委員會代碼:str":["社會福利及衛生環境委員會","司法及法制委員會"],"標題":"第11屆第4會期社會福利及衛生環境、司法及法制委員會第1次聯席會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2025-11-19T13:13:40+08:00","結束時間":"2025-11-19T13:19:07+08:00","影片長度":"00:05:27","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/9c5448532e3833d1d0ddadcba4b4da7d0799e8a58cec5c3e662daff7a264498aeebc5b1f2304e56a5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"牛煦庭","委員發言時間":"13:13:40 - 13:19:07","會議時間":"2025-11-19T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"立法院第11屆第4會期社會福利及衛生環境、司法及法制委員會第1次聯席會議（事由：審查\n一、委員葉元之等18人擬具「家庭暴力防治法第六十條條文修正草案」案。\n二、委員王育敏等16人擬具「家庭暴力防治法部分條文修正草案」案。\n三、委員邱鎮軍等18人擬具「家庭暴力防治法部分條文修正草案」案。\n四、委員蘇清泉等18人擬具「家庭暴力防治法第三十一條條文修正草案」案。\n五、委員廖先翔等22人擬具「家庭暴力防治法部分條文修正草案」案。\n六、委員郭昱晴等17人擬具「家庭暴力防治法部分條文修正草案」案。\n七、委員羅廷瑋等16人擬具「家庭暴力防治法第三十一條條文修正草案」案。\n八、委員廖偉翔等16人擬具「家庭暴力防治法第三十一條條文修正草案」案。\n【第八案如經復議，則不予審查】）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":0.84096875,"end":1.44846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":2.0222187500000004,"end":2.71409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":3.2878437500000004,"end":3.99659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":7.523468750000001,"end":9.599093750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":9.83534375,"end":50.892218750000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":52.30971875,"end":68.03721875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":68.03721875000001,"end":68.07096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":68.07096875,"end":69.03284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":69.03284375,"end":69.33659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":69.33659375,"end":69.97784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":69.97784375,"end":72.40784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":72.30659375,"end":72.55971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":72.55971875,"end":77.58846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":77.67284375,"end":78.48284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":79.22534375000001,"end":107.55846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":108.01409375,"end":108.28409375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":108.28409375000001,"end":108.31784375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":109.06034375,"end":110.15721875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":110.42721875000001,"end":123.74159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":114.88221875,"end":115.89471875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":122.56034375,"end":133.84971875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":133.96784375000001,"end":157.03596875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":135.70596875,"end":136.04346875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":140.02596875,"end":140.36346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":143.50221875,"end":143.90721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":147.77159375000002,"end":148.15971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":157.18784375,"end":158.38596875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":158.53784375,"end":167.27909375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":167.27909375000002,"end":167.54909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":167.58284375000002,"end":184.00221875000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":183.22596875000002,"end":187.68096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":188.18721875,"end":203.20596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":190.56659375,"end":190.90409375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":199.56096875,"end":199.61159375000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":199.96596875,"end":200.86034375000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":201.40034375000002,"end":203.05409375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":203.37471875,"end":208.87596875000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":209.60159375,"end":219.65909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":215.62596875000003,"end":219.72659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":219.72659375,"end":219.96284375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":219.96284375000002,"end":262.72409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":221.02596875,"end":222.24096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":223.74284375000002,"end":224.31659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":235.35284375,"end":235.48784375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":235.67346875,"end":235.75784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":263.12909375000004,"end":271.16159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":271.22909375,"end":273.59159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":273.59159375,"end":282.36659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":275.48159375,"end":276.22409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":277.25346875,"end":279.07596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":280.59471875,"end":324.99284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":323.72721875,"end":324.21659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":324.60471875,"end":324.77346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":324.99284375,"end":326.25846875}],"whisperx":[{"start":1.054,"end":3.745,"text":"謝主席 石部長有請有請石部長"},{"start":7.7,"end":36.326,"text":"委員好部長午安辛苦了這個我想家暴的防治也不應該只是衛福部的責任啦因為其實有法令也有相關的一些執行那當然也有一些預防等等所以其實不管法務部司法院教育部等等應該相互合作處理這個事但我們今天質詢也不是要指責誰因為最近發生一些悲劇我們希望可以從制度面的層面探討解決問題那現在家暴法我們看相關的一些很多提案修法的方向都是在增加罰則每次遇到問題我們就增加罰則當然有一定的嚇阻效果"},{"start":36.946,"end":50.498,"text":"但我想在面對新北市土城這個案子就是先申請了保護令但是在程序中並沒有實施預防性羈押然後到後來回過頭來採取了更極端的作為導致了人命的損失增加罰則對於這樣的案例有用嗎"},{"start":52.672,"end":77.054,"text":"因為這個案子有兩種一種是已經違反了這個保護令然後這個有沒有羈押成立或者是這個給予更強制性的一些這個措施對啊 所以顯然沒辦法預防對不對我只是增加法則沒有用嘛 對不對那第二個問題是我們的家暴法31條之一有規定預防性羈押相關的一些這個"},{"start":79.361,"end":107.09,"text":"配套措施但這樣的案子裡面其實有多次家暴的記錄啊以這個土城的案子來講也因為違反保護令有進到法庭的程序裡面嘛但是怎麼樣來講都是摸不到那個預防性羈押的門檻嘛所以當然在法務部等等在執行的時候法院的體系在執行的時候最後只能無保次回嘛那無保次回之後就發現是破洞了嘛那現在現行的條件我們除了講說要增加罰則增加嚇阻效果之外我們要不要考慮提高一下預防性羈押的應該說降低一下預防性羈押的門檻部長"},{"start":109.236,"end":128.872,"text":"預防性羈押剛剛其實在林委員質詢的時候有提到他那個刑度的關係讓這個要羈押的可能性降低所以這個是可以未來來討論可以討論對不對好謝謝我就要聽這句話因為本期的提案雖然現在還在連署但我們提案的方向其實就是鬆綁相關的門檻現在衛福部針對家暴風險有一個"},{"start":132.955,"end":156.641,"text":"TIPVDA這個要怎麼唸TIDA我剛有稍微聽到這個叫做親密關係危險暴力評估表1234危不危險等等它其實是一個初判那初判裡面其實你也有提說你需不需要政府介入來做協助那本席的建議是這樣就不妨用這一張表當作一個很好的切入基準也就是說在這一張表上你當然可以調整一下內容跟介入的程度"},{"start":157.361,"end":186.42,"text":"如果符合被害人或者是高風險被害人他心裡的恐懼等等程度等等到一定的程度他其實就應該跟可不可以採取預防性羈押進行掛鉤嘛換言之這個分數達到非常非常高的時候我直接可以處理預防性羈押我是不是比起現在我要怎麼反覆再犯而且有明確事實證明反覆再犯我才能做預防性羈押來得強得多部長你覺得咧我們要不要考慮一下修正這張表跟修正相關的法條讓他可以掛鉤就是說這個TIDA的兩表齁他的"},{"start":188.361,"end":207.767,"text":"叫做預測準確性啦他是高危機個案的預測目前這個當然可以提供給法官在裁量的時候的一個參考對現在只是參考嘛對對對但沒有都沒有強制要沒有強制性的那怎麼去精進這個我們可以再回過頭來看一下這個量這個量表"},{"start":209.888,"end":222.002,"text":"並不是這個每一個這個就跟前面這個委員有提到我幫你講啦他可能不能當成唯一標準但他是眾多標準之一對不對我們把"},{"start":224.985,"end":239.843,"text":"問題拉開來看就是說高風險個案進行預防性羈押可不可以讓被害人有更充足的時間跟心理壓力可以進行生活圈的徹底隔離從技術上跟政策方向應該要做到這個事嘛好那我們就要針對這個事嘛本期的版本的意思大概的概念是這樣就是說"},{"start":241.164,"end":262.467,"text":"以現在修法 現在的版本要預防性羈押只能違反保護令然後成立嫌疑重大然後反覆實行的事實認證嘛這是這麼多的三管五卡你才能羈押 所以羈押率非常低然後所以出現各種破洞本期的版本是這樣違反保護令或者成立相關的家暴已經有犯罪事實或者有事實認證反覆"},{"start":263.608,"end":278.701,"text":"這些跟之前都一樣 你是採取聯級任何之一都可以 加上這一張表認定達一定標準 認定成為高風險者這樣子的方向 請問衛福部是否贊同這個方向我們支持加上我們這個評估非常感謝 這我們希望"},{"start":279.622,"end":297.748,"text":"兩表我們還需要再兩表跟著精進都沒有問題我相信衛福部跟相關人等的專業最後花一點點時間因為很多人都大家都希望法律還可以保障人權但是我想部長應該也蠻清楚這年頭就是亂世嘛治亂世要用重點現在這都已經討論到詐騙犯要不要用鞭刑了對不對"},{"start":298.428,"end":325.294,"text":"所以說大家的民意的主流焦慮跟期待是害怕這些事情傷害到本來大家寧靜安正常的生活所以還在過度的保護加害人其實是不合時宜的所以我認為把家暴相關預防性階段的門檻往下降我覺得應該是合於社會大眾的期待也有助於遏止家暴的發生啦好不好那就希望版本進來的時候衛福部會有開放的心態當然可以提意見但我們往這個方向前進可以嗎可以可以好謝謝部長辛苦了謝謝謝謝委員"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}