{"error":false,"id":["166694"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":166694,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/166694","日期":"2025-12-26","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"院會-11-4-15","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第4會期第15次會議","屆":11,"會期":4,"會次":15,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"院會","標題":"第11屆第4會期第15次會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2025-12-26T12:09:57+08:00","結束時間":"2025-12-26T12:13:10+08:00","影片長度":"00:03:13","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/c8ec410dc86e14aff6ee07538bcb51a7011dc5e1560d0623c03e8cc1f58c59a761f4198ff1cb05dc5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"鍾佳濱","委員發言時間":"12:09:57 - 12:13:10","會議時間":"2025-12-26T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第4會期第15次會議（事由：一、討論事項：本院國民黨黨團，建請院會作成決議，針對憲法法庭大法官謝銘洋、呂太郎、陳忠五、尤伯祥、蔡彩貞，因逾越司法權限，予以嚴厲譴責。又此次憲法法庭未依法合法組成，114年憲判字第1號判決有重大明顯瑕疵，應屬當然無效；至於大法官援引此判決，以人數未達憲法訴訟法所定法定門檻10位所作之任何憲法裁判，亦均屬無效，請公決案等6案。二、12月26日上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。三、12月30日下午5時至6時為處理臨時提案時間。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":6.527843750000001,"end":7.050968750000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":7.607843750000001,"end":8.62034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":9.447218750000001,"end":10.61159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":11.387843750000002,"end":11.978468750000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":12.31596875,"end":13.51409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":13.902218750000003,"end":15.404093750000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":15.657218750000002,"end":17.47971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":17.918468750000002,"end":19.33596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":19.403468750000002,"end":22.94721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":23.75721875,"end":28.60034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":28.97159375,"end":29.66346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":29.96721875,"end":35.24909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":35.704718750000005,"end":42.893468750000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":43.34909375,"end":51.617843750000006},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":51.92159375,"end":55.90409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":56.393468750000004,"end":57.18659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":57.69284375,"end":58.51971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":58.94159375,"end":59.92034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":60.257843750000006,"end":61.70909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":62.265968750000006,"end":63.39659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":64.05471875,"end":66.04596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":66.61971875,"end":68.59409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":69.38721875,"end":71.34471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":71.83409375000001,"end":72.54284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":73.04909375,"end":89.77221875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":90.19409375000001,"end":97.02846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":98.20971875000001,"end":101.63534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":102.46221875,"end":108.26721875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":108.40221875,"end":119.75909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":117.88596875,"end":118.07159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":120.28221875000001,"end":128.92221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":129.29346875000002,"end":140.88659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":141.42659375,"end":141.79784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":142.52346875,"end":146.62409375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":147.29909375,"end":156.52971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":156.96846875,"end":172.42596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":173.03346875,"end":175.39596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":175.96971875,"end":188.65971875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":189.55409375000002,"end":194.41409375}],"whisperx":[{"start":6.55,"end":34.755,"text":"主席再當委員先進我們還是要重申憲法是重要的東西腦袋是好東西兩個一起用就不會違憲剛剛張旗開委員真的是憲法本文跟徵修條文傻傻分不清憲法本文57條講的是經出席委員三分之二出席委員憲法本文但是罷免跟彈劾的門款寫在徵修條文是指全體立法委員"},{"start":36.108,"end":61.443,"text":"連出席立法委員總數跟全體立法委員都分不清楚真的拜託腦袋跟憲法好好用一用為什麼我們今天認為這樣的一個對於憲法法庭的判決不予遵守這是立法委員的職權嗎過去這段時間我們看到的報紙的社論說過去一年很亂什麼罷免什麼復議什麼不附屬通通都是違憲來一條一條"},{"start":64.305,"end":89.565,"text":"罷免 寫在憲法第17條選舉罷免 創制覆決賦予 寫在憲法第37條然後呢還有附屬寫在37條 賦予寫在57條還有最重要的77條跟78條看一下司法院為最高司法機關什麼叫做司法機關有沒有違法 有沒有違憲由司法院或是憲法法庭來判定"},{"start":91.486,"end":100.969,"text":"78條司法院處理違憲就是憲法解釋跟統一法令解釋什麼時候立法院可以來解釋違法"},{"start":102.506,"end":119.389,"text":"立法院目前的職權大概我們看一下58條跟63條寫得很清楚憲法58條行政院要提出立法院的有什麼法律案、預算案、戒嚴案、大赦案、宣戰案、共和案還有條約案以及其他重要事項"},{"start":120.65,"end":146.388,"text":"這些由行政院來提出立法院根據我們的63條他只能來一決法律案 預算案哪個眼睛看到憲法或政策條文寫到立法院可以超越司法院至上對於違法違憲進行判決 進行決定沒有一手提出彈劾希望未來達到三分之二"},{"start":147.372,"end":170.8,"text":"注意啊 是全體立法院的三分之二 憲法讀一讀 真正條文讀一讀就算可以達到三分之二 也要拿到憲法法庭審理現在又說憲法法庭的決議不接受 要譴責大法官不接受憲法法庭的決議就好像你去法院要告人家 又說法院的判決我不接受請問你是精神錯亂 還是黨格錯亂"},{"start":173.101,"end":188.457,"text":"所以我要呼籲藍白兩黨 憲法是好東西 腦袋是好東西回去憲法好好讀一讀 腦袋好好想一想來譴責大法官 立法院不是國會獨大 沒 都沒有"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}