{"error":false,"id":["166699"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":166699,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/166699","日期":"2025-12-26","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"院會-11-4-15","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第4會期第15次會議","屆":11,"會期":4,"會次":15,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"院會","標題":"第11屆第4會期第15次會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2025-12-26T12:26:50+08:00","結束時間":"2025-12-26T12:29:58+08:00","影片長度":"00:03:08","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/c8ec410dc86e14afa94c3e94bf0b85a0011dc5e1560d0623c03e8cc1f58c59a74159dd19c61a0ed75ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"吳宗憲","委員發言時間":"12:26:50 - 12:29:58","會議時間":"2025-12-26T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第4會期第15次會議（事由：一、討論事項：本院國民黨黨團，建請院會作成決議，針對憲法法庭大法官謝銘洋、呂太郎、陳忠五、尤伯祥、蔡彩貞，因逾越司法權限，予以嚴厲譴責。又此次憲法法庭未依法合法組成，114年憲判字第1號判決有重大明顯瑕疵，應屬當然無效；至於大法官援引此判決，以人數未達憲法訴訟法所定法定門檻10位所作之任何憲法裁判，亦均屬無效，請公決案等6案。二、12月26日上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。三、12月30日下午5時至6時為處理臨時提案時間。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":5.498468750000001,"end":6.544718750000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":6.7134687500000005,"end":8.282843750000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":8.50221875,"end":11.556593750000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":11.82659375,"end":12.602843750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":12.88971875,"end":13.969718750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":14.138468750000001,"end":14.762843750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":15.25221875,"end":17.90159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":18.17159375,"end":21.05721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":21.15846875,"end":22.89659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":23.132843750000003,"end":23.504093750000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":23.74034375,"end":24.22971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":24.567218750000002,"end":26.84534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":27.13221875,"end":28.53284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":28.718468750000003,"end":31.50284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":31.85721875,"end":33.93284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":34.42221875,"end":39.38346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":39.720968750000004,"end":42.775343750000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":43.06221875,"end":55.90409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":56.258468750000006,"end":58.688468750000006},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":58.84034375,"end":64.29096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":64.35846875,"end":70.28159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":70.29846875,"end":77.82471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":78.55034375000001,"end":80.67659375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":80.89596875000001,"end":84.05159375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":84.69284375000001,"end":85.94159375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":86.29596875,"end":90.12659375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":90.70034375,"end":93.09659375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":94.34534375000001,"end":97.14659375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":97.38284375,"end":100.57221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":100.80846875,"end":103.06971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":104.26784375000001,"end":117.32909375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":117.49784375,"end":119.91096875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":120.33284375000001,"end":120.78846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":120.92346875000001,"end":123.11721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":123.43784375000001,"end":130.08659375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":131.57159375,"end":148.05846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":148.96971875,"end":159.43221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":159.90471875,"end":161.92971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":163.14471875,"end":174.50159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":174.67034375,"end":176.30721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":176.62784375,"end":187.79909375000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":188.25471875000002,"end":188.96346875}],"whisperx":[{"start":5.769,"end":33.654,"text":"謝謝主席我想今天在野黨譴責大法官是因為我們正面臨的是一個憲政的災難那五位大法官呂太郎 謝明陽 蔡凱珍 陳忠武還有游博翔聯手耐心的把今天現在法庭變成一個違法運作的政治工具我想第一個這是一場徹頭徹尾的綠色雙標在2017年的時候在野黨針對前瞻特別條例提出釋憲大法官當時駁回的理由是因為"},{"start":34.814,"end":55.777,"text":"當時的高清素美委員沒有投票所以法定少一個人所以就必須撥回但是現在又變成少一人沒有關係所以當年黨在野黨是少一人都不行現在為了護航執政黨少一個人變得無所謂所以這不是法律這變成是無賴的家法所以這變成綠能你不能這是非常明顯的例子"},{"start":56.317,"end":77.635,"text":"第二個違法組成的會議就是無效我想第三位大法官蔡忠貞 楊惠卿 朱富美也明白的指出憲法82條還有憲法徵修條文第5條明白的把大法官15人這個組織會議的組織 合議的組織交給立法院來制定所以憲訴法對於大法官就是具有絕對的拘束力"},{"start":78.756,"end":102.911,"text":"現在只剩下八個人所以五個人幫大法官不僅他不要求總統趕快提名他反而自己想出一套去除雜質從賺人分母的這個獨裁式的數學他把三位堅守程序正義的拒絕參與這個違法平易的大法官排除在現有總額之外那宣稱五個人就可以代表憲法法庭"},{"start":104.315,"end":129.779,"text":"第三個沒有延遲辯論就是心虛就是黑箱大家回過頭去想想去年國會改革釋憲的時候我黃國昌翁小林我們也坦蕩蕩的出席延遲辯論啊當時的憲法法庭也直播啊那為什麼這一次就關起門來在冷氣房裡面做密室的判決這就表示這位大法官他知道理虧嘛那不然為什麼去年就要延遲辯論今年要關起門來躲起來"},{"start":131.616,"end":147.451,"text":"第四個 這是一般違法的失速列車我想現在法庭人數不足才導致運作的困難那像這個這樣下去呢大法官反而要硬幹這個就像一台公車明明煞車失靈你卻說先開再說甚至大法官還自比救生員"},{"start":149.008,"end":161.367,"text":"但是法律要求十個大法官在場才能開 結果才能開放下水結果呢今天五個人就自行開你等於把憲法跟全國人民一起拉下去逆避嗎所以大法官你到底在想什麼"},{"start":163.188,"end":187.167,"text":"今天我們如果容認這幾位綠色大法官的這個想法少一個人沒關係那之後是不是只剩一個人也沒關係那最後賴清德會不會告訴我們立法院不存在也沒關係這是我們要求的民主嗎我想還是拜託總統趕快提名大法官的人選不要讓憲法法庭再癱瘓也請大家支持我們這個譴責案我們要譴責這樣不應該的大法官謝謝"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}