{"error":false,"id":["167013"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":167013,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/167013","日期":"2026-01-09","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"院會-11-4-17","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第4會期第17次會議","屆":11,"會期":4,"會次":17,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"院會","標題":"第11屆第4會期第17次會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2026-01-09T09:07:15+08:00","結束時間":"2026-01-09T09:10:34+08:00","影片長度":"00:03:19","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/a2e7c2a09347055a1fda4028fadc054941a35ee728f2ae2272593896e5e370c487e74d03d353af155ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"林倩綺","委員發言時間":"09:07:15 - 09:10:34","會議時間":"2026-01-09T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第4會期第17次會議（事由：一、討論事項：本院內政委員會報告審查委員楊曜等17人擬具「公職人員選舉罷免法第六十七條及第六十九條條文修正草案」案等3案。二、1月9日上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。三、1月13日下午5時至6時為處理臨時提案時間。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":10.122218750000002,"end":13.58159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":14.087843750000001,"end":18.91409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":19.133468750000002,"end":32.80221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":33.392843750000004,"end":53.963468750000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":54.149093750000006,"end":73.89284375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":74.41596875,"end":87.84846875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":88.60784375,"end":115.00034375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":115.89471875000001,"end":118.72971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":118.88159375000001,"end":127.47096875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":128.58471875,"end":131.26784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":131.85846875000001,"end":147.70409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":147.97409375,"end":168.00471875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":168.25784375,"end":194.71784375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":198.97034375,"end":199.42596875}],"whisperx":[{"start":10.151,"end":32.019,"text":"院長、府會同仁、媒體朋友、全國民眾大家好原民身份不是形式國家應保障認同權本席今天要談的不只是近來互證事務的老民而是原住民族的身份在修法之後是否真正理解並尊重原住民族身份認同的根本問題"},{"start":33.899,"end":53.572,"text":"111年憲判自第四號已經為國家揭示了方向原住民族身份認定不應該留於形式更不能僅以外表的表徵來作為核心的認定標準憲法法庭所要保障的是族群認同的實質內涵而不是行政上方便操作的判斷工具"},{"start":54.272,"end":73.437,"text":"然而新制上路后我们看到一种现象原本依法取得身份的族人因为制度转换却被迫面对身份不确定的风险认同不再是被视为长期生活与文化实践的累积而是被转化为必须反复通过的行政门槛"},{"start":74.497,"end":90.725,"text":"全國約有7000多名族人因家庭結構變動由原住民身份的父或母單獨行使侵權在過去制度下合法取得身份如今卻直接承受衝擊的一群弱力條款期限戒制"},{"start":91.385,"end":114.735,"text":"桃园仍有近千名的族人可能失去原名的身份这是制度设计出现结构性问题的警讯如此攸关身份与权益的重大调整事前却没有充分的社会沟通许多族人是在期限逼近的时候才意识到制度改变户政人员与地方民代对于身份的认知也存在的理解上很大的落差"},{"start":116.033,"end":126.783,"text":"還有相關的規範大家的理解並不清楚行政準備跟政策說明明顯不足制度的改變不應該讓人民在毫無準備的情況下突然站到權益的懸崖邊"},{"start":128.632,"end":145.705,"text":"因此本席提出三點呼籲第一 現行以姓名為核心的身份認定方式是否已經偏離憲法法庭所揭示的認同權的保障意旨主管機關或應該有責任來向社會說明其核心的基礎或啟動實質的檢討"},{"start":148.047,"end":167.539,"text":"第二 修法後宣導不足執行落差頻繁的情況原民會內政部應該正式行政責任並提出具體補強與改善作為第三 對於權益空窗期的族人應該建立明確的過渡與補正機制避免人民為制度調整付出過高的代價"},{"start":168.399,"end":194.62,"text":"原住民族身份不是只有一個欄位而是長時期在家庭部落跟文化脈絡中形塑的生命經驗當制度要求族人反覆的以形式來回應證明自己的存在本身就已經偏離憲法增修條文第十條肯定多元文化並積極維護發展原住民族語言文化的意旨法律的目的應該是承接憲法所保障的尊嚴不是在無意"},{"start":198.951,"end":199.428,"text":"謝謝"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}