{"error":false,"id":["167372"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":167372,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/167372","日期":"2026-01-30","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"院會-11-4-20","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第4會期第20次會議","屆":11,"會期":4,"會次":20,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"院會","標題":"第11屆第4會期第20次會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2026-01-30T18:04:23+08:00","結束時間":"2026-01-30T18:07:36+08:00","影片長度":"00:03:13","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/e337dede71696a97f95b9f1cff7857aef610852d0c756f8fa4e4e6542f705ec0dc3fb96d4c95e3195ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"林楚茵","委員發言時間":"18:04:23 - 18:07:36","會議時間":"2026-01-30T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第4會期第20次會議（事由：一、討論事項：本院國民黨黨團，建請院會作成決議，針對115年度中央政府總預算案中，攸關重大民生之新興資本支出及新增計畫之部分，於電視台舉行三場全國轉播的辯論會，由「國民黨黨團三長VS行政院三長」方式進行。是否有當？請公決案等2案。二、上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。三、下午5時至6時為處理臨時提案時間。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":5.970968750000001,"end":7.422218750000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":7.472843750000001,"end":11.269718750000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":11.657843750000001,"end":16.90596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":17.445968750000002,"end":21.32721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":21.512843750000002,"end":27.68909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":29.140343750000003,"end":36.90284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":38.134718750000005,"end":51.17909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":51.36471875,"end":60.12284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":60.44346875,"end":76.62659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":77.31846875000001,"end":82.68471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":83.25846875,"end":103.86284375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":104.72346875000001,"end":115.50659375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":115.81034375,"end":134.44034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":135.04784375,"end":139.75596875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":140.31284375,"end":176.86409375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":177.23534375,"end":177.97784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":178.65284375000002,"end":186.33096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":186.68534375000002,"end":190.39784375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":193.60409375,"end":193.97534375}],"whisperx":[{"start":5.967,"end":27.435,"text":"各位立法院的同仁我想今天我們可以站在這裡我們背後有一群非常優秀的助理協助我們這是不論是民進黨國民黨或者是民眾黨我現在的發言想要代表我辦公室的主任來念以下這些文章因為對他們來說現在修的法令對他們的影響非常的大"},{"start":29.195,"end":35.583,"text":"其實這一次立法院的組織法修正案提到的是要提升基層的待遇增加專業加級"},{"start":38.168,"end":65.444,"text":"他們心裡其實很期待的是我們都知道國會助理的薪資結構長年僵化如果修法的初衷是為了改善我們的勞動條件我相信沒有任何一個政黨或一個黨團或是任何一個助理會反對但是依照牛許廷的版本我們希望他是利益良善本席也相信朝野立委都願意支持提升助理的待遇然而牛許廷的條文當中用補助費的字眼"},{"start":66.064,"end":81.896,"text":"替代了原本法條內容立法院因每年編列每一位立委一定數額之助理費及其辦公事務預算這樣的寫法其實突生了法律上對於助理費的定性的爭議"},{"start":83.577,"end":103.108,"text":"當立法院的法治局的內參研究報告都可以拿來作為解釋依據更遑論今天的法案落筆的條款根本就直接把它定性為立委自己的小金庫如果真的是要提升助理的待遇為出發點"},{"start":104.775,"end":134.175,"text":"我想不会有助理去争执这些文字,而是这个文字直接的就让立委可以拥有这一笔钱。魔鬼藏在细节里,当我们摊开国民党牛许婷的版本后,我们看到的是一个极度危险,甚至于可以说是挂羊头卖狗肉的条款,那就是将公费助理的薪资、奖金等八项费用定性为就是给立委的补助。"},{"start":135.075,"end":156.102,"text":"大家可能會問 發錢有差嗎 有差 差異非常大最高法院長期以來的穩定見解助理費就是國家編列給立委 聘用助理的專款這一筆錢不是立委的薪水 更不是立委的私房錢如果你將這筆錢挪作他用 就是貪污 就是詐領"},{"start":157.282,"end":177.709,"text":"然而藍白陣營這次的修法企圖透過立法院貸給己付以及交費用轉為立委薪資的一部分徹底顛覆了這個法律邏輯一旦這個法案通過這筆錢的法律屬性變得模糊就真的變成立委的實際補助所以"},{"start":178.729,"end":189.859,"text":"本人在這裡代表本辦公室的立委以及所有立法院辦公室的助理以及代表所有的同仁助理們請你們高抬貴手"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}