{"error":false,"id":["167375"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":167375,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/167375","日期":"2026-01-30","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"院會-11-4-20","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第4會期第20次會議","屆":11,"會期":4,"會次":20,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"院會","標題":"第11屆第4會期第20次會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2026-01-30T18:14:42+08:00","結束時間":"2026-01-30T18:17:50+08:00","影片長度":"00:03:08","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/e337dede71696a97f6a76c3e93656509f610852d0c756f8fa4e4e6542f705ec039c7ac6a666915c55ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"范雲","委員發言時間":"18:14:42 - 18:17:50","會議時間":"2026-01-30T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第4會期第20次會議（事由：一、討論事項：本院國民黨黨團，建請院會作成決議，針對115年度中央政府總預算案中，攸關重大民生之新興資本支出及新增計畫之部分，於電視台舉行三場全國轉播的辯論會，由「國民黨黨團三長VS行政院三長」方式進行。是否有當？請公決案等2案。二、上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。三、下午5時至6時為處理臨時提案時間。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":4.1822187500000005,"end":37.86471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":38.20221875,"end":44.05784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":44.580968750000004,"end":46.63971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":47.095343750000005,"end":53.60909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":53.81159375,"end":56.494718750000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":56.697218750000005,"end":61.236593750000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":61.48971875,"end":68.13846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":68.34096875,"end":79.00596875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":79.63034375000001,"end":96.91034375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":97.24784375,"end":99.15471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":99.59346875,"end":102.36096875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":103.28909375,"end":110.64659375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":111.18659375,"end":115.30409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":116.09721875000001,"end":123.23534375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":123.67409375000001,"end":126.01971875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":126.82971875000001,"end":130.96409375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":131.28471875,"end":136.54971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":137.22471875000002,"end":188.17034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":189.41909375,"end":190.31346875}],"whisperx":[{"start":4.809,"end":30.928,"text":"剛剛劉許廷立委好像很不滿意覺得民進黨的委員沒有認真讀他的法條說實在的我真的沒有想到國民黨跟民眾黨就這麼的可恥把一個完全沒有在立法院的委員會認真討論的版本今天就要拿出來表決就在我們這個會期的最後一天如果這麼清白為什麼急著要表決"},{"start":31.869,"end":46.381,"text":"如果有这么多这么好的权益为什么不能够在委员会好好认真的讨论我看了这个法条如果我没有读错的话有两个核心的问题第一个他把内容模糊化"},{"start":47.362,"end":67.687,"text":"過去立法院編制是從預算支應給立委助理的薪水他把它修成改成地位形同辦公室費用的立委補助費用可能很多立法院外的人聽不懂這叫什麼意思我們當過立委跟立委助理的都知道"},{"start":68.507,"end":96.538,"text":"地位形同辦公室費用的就是助理買了多少文具直接從立委的薪水扣掉剩下沒有用到的就是立委的薪水他把助理費過去從有明確用途限制的公費變成和文具地位相等讓立委有政治裁量權的灰色地帶他等於是把重要的人事費跟補貼彈性運用的辦公室費用在法律上"},{"start":97.358,"end":125.768,"text":"放在同一條線上很糟糕的是還拖大家下水這是第一個核心問題第二個核心問題我想我們幾位懂法律的都已經在協商會所講過我看到的是把司法責任變成政治特權過去為什麼會有助理費案是因為有可核對 可舉證 可審查的公款未來如果再有任何的案子"},{"start":126.872,"end":151.138,"text":"他只要說他不是貪污 就是解釋不同就沒事了所以這根本就是把一個司法責任變成是政治特權你說 我在幫助理增加他的福利如果真的要處理助理的權益跟結構問題的話為什麼不是提高助理薪資的透明度為什麼沒有建立助理勞動權益的法制化"},{"start":152.038,"end":177.999,"text":"劉許平的助理費修法 不是反貪腐他是把貪腐合法化 行政化 集體化我想陳玉珍是真小人我要大聲告訴桃園的選民劉許平就是個偽君子羅列一堆助理看得到 其實很難吃不到的福利因為未來的立委可以合法不要聘用這麼多的助理我想這是藍白集體墮落的開始這個案子如果通過"},{"start":178.8,"end":187.765,"text":"不只是助理勞權的悲歌也是國會問政品質的再度懸崖式下降的開始藍白脫落不要拖我們大家下水"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}