{"error":false,"id":["170159"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":170159,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/170159","日期":"2026-06-26","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"院會-11-5-15","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第5會期第15次會議","屆":11,"會期":5,"會次":15,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"院會","標題":"第11屆第5會期第15次會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2026-06-26T12:15:50+08:00","結束時間":"2026-06-26T12:19:13+08:00","影片長度":"00:03:23","支援功能":["ai-transcript","gazette"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/916068e634f873fc231037fad684d27c7745857797b3d9ef5efa3ea763081e7bf0a3a616ef225dcc5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"莊瑞雄","委員發言時間":"12:15:50 - 12:19:13","會議時間":"2026-06-26T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第5會期第15次會議（事由：一、討論事項：本院財政委員會報告併案審查行政院函請審議、台灣民眾黨黨團、委員林思銘等21人、委員葛如鈞等20人、委員林楚茵等19人、委員賴惠員等17人、委員李彥秀等19人、委員賴士葆等20人、委員李柏毅等18人、委員郭國文等17人、委員林宜瑾等20人及委員鍾佳濱等23人分別擬具「虛擬資產服務法草案」案等4案。二、6月26日上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。三、6月30日下午5時至6時為處理臨時提案時間。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":5.363468750000001,"end":16.77096875,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":17.12534375,"end":17.93534375,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":18.88034375,"end":21.47909375,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":22.12034375,"end":23.031593750000003,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":23.774093750000002,"end":26.96346875,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":27.50346875,"end":41.96534375,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":42.28596875,"end":42.977843750000005,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":44.040968750000005,"end":45.15471875,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":45.76221875,"end":46.82534375,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":47.635343750000004,"end":48.681593750000005,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":48.83346875,"end":62.63721875,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":62.75534375,"end":66.02909375,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":67.83471875000001,"end":68.44221875000001,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":69.38721875,"end":70.02846875,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":70.50096875,"end":74.38221875,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":74.61846875,"end":79.63034375000001,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":80.81159375,"end":82.02659375,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":82.49909375,"end":97.28159375,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":97.58534375,"end":98.44596875,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":98.88471875,"end":109.34721875000001,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":109.98846875000001,"end":111.52409375,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":111.62534375000001,"end":113.53221875000001,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":113.86971875,"end":146.67471875,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":147.11346875,"end":164.78159375,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":165.32159375,"end":168.71346875,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":169.42221875,"end":171.49784375000002,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":172.62846875000002,"end":190.22909375,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":195.76409375,"end":197.46846875,"speaker_score":0.844},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"莊委員瑞雄","start":198.29534375,"end":203.96534375000002,"speaker_score":0.844}],"whisperx":[{"start":5.857,"end":19.933,"text":"謝謝主席還有在場同仁 剛我聽了許仲信委員的一席話到最後圖窮筆現是支持中國國民黨的一個提案其實各位要很清楚在113年憲法第八號憲法法庭"},{"start":23.817,"end":42.386,"text":"其實他是肯認死刑啊他並沒有違憲也沒有廢除掉死刑中國國民黨這樣的一個提案裡面啊其實他的重點只有一個他要讓死刑更好判就這麼簡單那個許仲勳委員應該也非常清楚國民黨就覺得愛死刑比較好判"},{"start":44.093,"end":65.745,"text":"我們地方法院何一庭三個人高等法院三個人最高法院五個人你把它想想看一個重大案件你不要以為說死刑就只有刑事案件啊你從刑法地刑法分責一百條開始往後去看那個內亂外患通敵的全部都是判死刑啊那以這些來看的話你說一審的法官"},{"start":68.038,"end":78.185,"text":"2比1那你怎麼辦另外一個跟你說不要啦不用到死刑啦無期徒刑就好了啦二審法官你上訴上去以後兩個人認為說這個應該是無期徒刑"},{"start":80.845,"end":109.223,"text":"他一個認為要死刑上訴到最高法院五個法官形成一個合議庭的時候又是三比二了那怎麼辦也就是說到底要不要死刑連法官組成的合議庭裡面啊你都沒有辦法一致的一個確信你叫老百姓在這個地方打架那所以呢憲法法庭這樣的一個認為要判處死刑要一致性的話其實要跟你講說啊人命啊死掉就不可逆了不可能再回來所以"},{"start":110.683,"end":129.009,"text":"剝奪老百姓的生命的剝奪被告的生命的你要非常的慎重所以要以自覺然後也是在告訴你說有它的一個不可逆性今天提出這樣的一個公投案其實不是在解決司法問題是在製造一個政治上的話題"},{"start":130.589,"end":146.416,"text":"如果說憲法法庭今天告訴你要一字決你今天都要把它給推翻掉的話你明天要推翻掉的可能就是憲法啦你用公投去決定憲判的一個程序這個其實很清楚啊就是用政治在介入司法"},{"start":147.657,"end":168.594,"text":"這個問題其實不用劍把弩張啦大家可以講道理啦我也知道中國國民黨你也可以提出基於國民主權我們都清楚但問題就是說你用公投去決定法官如何來判案你受傷的不只是司法的一個制度啊其實我覺得衝擊最大的是人民的一個基本權啊國民黨1949年到台灣啊"},{"start":172.794,"end":190.302,"text":"國民黨當初就最喜歡用死刑來餵餓百姓動不動就唯一死刑以前的連大法官全部都是執政黨的一個打手我們好不容易民主化40年讓整個憲法法庭變成一個公開透明又專業的他做出了一個一致決定好 謝謝莊委員"},{"start":198.376,"end":203.534,"text":"法院會現在在議場二樓旁聽席的是台中市"}],"gazette":[{"speaker":"莊委員瑞雄","start":"2026-06-26T12:15:55.857000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-06-26T12:15:57.238000+08:00","text":"謝謝主席還有在座的同仁。","quality":0.818},{"speaker":"莊委員瑞雄","start":"2026-06-26T12:15:57.639000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-06-26T12:16:04.486000+08:00","text":"剛剛我聽了許忠信委員的一席話，到最後圖窮匕現，是支持中國國民黨的提案。","quality":0.906},{"speaker":"莊委員瑞雄","start":"2026-06-26T12:16:05.207000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-06-26T12:16:32.366000+08:00","text":"其實各位要很清楚，憲法法庭在113年的憲判字第8號判決其實是肯認死刑並沒有違憲，也沒有廢除掉死刑，在中國國民黨這樣的一個提案裡面，其實重點只有一個，就是要讓死刑更好判，就是這麼簡單，許忠信委員應該也非常清楚，國民黨就是想要讓死刑比較好判。","quality":0.811},{"speaker":"莊委員瑞雄","start":"2026-06-26T12:16:34.093000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-06-26T12:16:52.183000+08:00","text":"我們地方法院合議庭是3個人、高等法院是3個人、最高法院是5個人，你可以想想看，如果是重大案件，你不要以為只有刑事案件才判死刑，你從刑法分則第一百條開始往後看，像內亂、外患、通敵的全部都是判死刑。","quality":0.798},{"speaker":"莊委員瑞雄","start":"2026-06-26T12:16:53.083000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-06-26T12:17:00.680000+08:00","text":"以這些來看的話，如果一審的法官是2比1，那要怎麼辦？","quality":0.81},{"speaker":"莊委員瑞雄","start":"2026-06-26T12:17:00.980000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-06-26T12:17:18.170000+08:00","text":"其中一個人說不用判死刑，判無期徒刑就好了；在提上訴以後，如果有2個二審法官認為應該要判無期徒刑，有1個認為要判死刑；在上訴到最高法院以後，合議庭有5個法官，而且是3比2，那要怎麼辦？","quality":0.623},{"speaker":"莊委員瑞雄","start":"2026-06-26T12:17:18.170000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-06-26T12:17:26.935000+08:00","text":"也就是說，連在法官組成的合議庭裡面都沒有辦法形成一致的確信，你叫老百姓在這個地方打架！","quality":0.925},{"speaker":"莊委員瑞雄","start":"2026-06-26T12:17:29.296000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-06-26T12:17:52.027000+08:00","text":"憲法法庭的判決認為判處死刑要有一致性，其實就是要跟你說人死掉是不可逆的，不可能再復活，剝奪老百姓的生命、剝奪被告的生命必須要非常的慎重，所以要一致決，這也是在告訴大家死刑有其不可逆性。","quality":0.765},{"speaker":"莊委員瑞雄","start":"2026-06-26T12:17:52.567000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-06-26T12:18:08.312000+08:00","text":"今天提出這樣一個公投案其實不是在解決司法問題，而是在製造一個政治上的話題，如果憲法法庭告訴你要一致決，你今天都要把它給推翻掉的話，你明天要推翻掉的可能就是憲法了！","quality":0.961},{"speaker":"莊委員瑞雄","start":"2026-06-26T12:18:08.873000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-06-26T12:18:21.179000+08:00","text":"你用公投去決定憲判的程序，這個其實很清楚，就是用政治在介入司法，這個問題其實不用劍拔弩張，大家可以講道理啦！","quality":0.98},{"speaker":"莊委員瑞雄","start":"2026-06-26T12:18:21.580000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-06-26T12:18:38.354000+08:00","text":"我也知道，中國國民黨基於國民主權可以提出，我們都清楚，但是問題就是說，你用公投去決定法官如何來判案，會受傷的不只是司法的制度，我覺得受到最大衝擊的其實是人民的基本權。","quality":0.842},{"speaker":"莊委員瑞雄","start":"2026-06-26T12:18:38.494000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-06-26T12:19:00.122000+08:00","text":"國民黨在1949年到臺灣，國民黨當初就最喜歡用死刑來威嚇百姓，動不動就是唯一死刑，以前連大法官全部都是執政黨的打手，我們好不容易民主化40年，讓整個憲法法庭變成公開、透明又專業，憲法法庭做出要一致決的判決，對於是不是要來挑戰憲法法庭，我相信大家應該要三思，謝謝。","quality":0.675},{"speaker":"主席","start":"2026-06-26T12:19:00.282000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-06-26T12:19:00.302000+08:00","text":"謝謝莊委員。","quality":1},{"speaker":"主席","start":"2026-06-26T12:19:08.577000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-06-26T12:19:13.514000+08:00","text":"報告院會，現在在議場2樓旁聽席的是臺中市直轄市退伍軍人協會豐原區會的朋友，我們在這邊歡迎他們到立法院參訪。","quality":0.327},{"speaker":"主席","start":"2026-06-26T12:19:14.014000+08:00","guessed":true,"end":"2026-06-26T12:19:27.156857+08:00","text":"報告院會，現在在2樓旁聽席的還有南投縣竹山鎮青溪婦女協會的朋友，一樣在這邊歡迎他們到立法院參訪，謝謝。","quality":0},{"speaker":"主席","start":"2026-06-26T12:19:27.456857+08:00","guessed":true,"end":"2026-06-26T12:19:30.599714+08:00","text":"下一位請吳宗憲委員發言。","quality":0}]},"gazette":{"lineno":819,"blocks":[["莊委員瑞雄：（12時15分）謝謝主席還有在座的同仁。剛剛我聽了許忠信委員的一席話，到最後圖窮匕現，是支持中國國民黨的提案。其實各位要很清楚，憲法法庭在113年的憲判字第8號判決其實是肯認死刑並沒有違憲，也沒有廢除掉死刑，在中國國民黨這樣的一個提案裡面，其實重點只有一個，就是要讓死刑更好判，就是這麼簡單，許忠信委員應該也非常清楚，國民黨就是想要讓死刑比較好判。我們地方法院合議庭是3個人、高等法院是3個人、最高法院是5個人，你可以想想看，如果是重大案件，你不要以為只有刑事案件才判死刑，你從刑法分則第一百條開始往後看，像內亂、外患、通敵的全部都是判死刑。以這些來看的話，如果一審的法官是2比1，那要怎麼辦？其中一個人說不用判死刑，判無期徒刑就好了；在提上訴以後，如果有2個二審法官認為應該要判無期徒刑，有1個認為要判死刑；在上訴到最高法院以後，合議庭有5個法官，而且是3比2，那要怎麼辦？也就是說，連在法官組成的合議庭裡面都沒有辦法形成一致的確信，你叫老百姓在這個地方打架！憲法法庭的判決認為判處死刑要有一致性，其實就是要跟你說人死掉是不可逆的，不可能再復活，剝奪老百姓的生命、剝奪被告的生命必須要非常的慎重，所以要一致決，這也是在告訴大家死刑有其不可逆性。","今天提出這樣一個公投案其實不是在解決司法問題，而是在製造一個政治上的話題，如果憲法法庭告訴你要一致決，你今天都要把它給推翻掉的話，你明天要推翻掉的可能就是憲法了！你用公投去決定憲判的程序，這個其實很清楚，就是用政治在介入司法，這個問題其實不用劍拔弩張，大家可以講道理啦！我也知道，中國國民黨基於國民主權可以提出，我們都清楚，但是問題就是說，你用公投去決定法官如何來判案，會受傷的不只是司法的制度，我覺得受到最大衝擊的其實是人民的基本權。","國民黨在1949年到臺灣，國民黨當初就最喜歡用死刑來威嚇百姓，動不動就是唯一死刑，以前連大法官全部都是執政黨的打手，我們好不容易民主化40年，讓整個憲法法庭變成公開、透明又專業，憲法法庭做出要一致決的判決，對於是不是要來挑戰憲法法庭，我相信大家應該要三思，謝謝。"],["主席：謝謝莊委員。","報告院會，現在在議場2樓旁聽席的是臺中市直轄市退伍軍人協會豐原區會的朋友，我們在這邊歡迎他們到立法院參訪。","報告院會，現在在2樓旁聽席的還有南投縣竹山鎮青溪婦女協會的朋友，一樣在這邊歡迎他們到立法院參訪，謝謝。","下一位請吳宗憲委員發言。"]],"agenda":{"page_end":30,"meet_id":"院會-11-5-15","speakers":["江啟臣"],"page_start":28,"meetingDate":["2026-06-26"],"gazette_id":"1155201","agenda_lcidc_ids":["1155201_00002"],"meet_name":"立法院第11屆第5會期第15次會議紀錄","content":"質詢事項","agenda_id":"1155201_00002"}}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}