{"error":false,"id":["170691"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":170691,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/170691","日期":"2026-07-23","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"公聽會-2026071639","會議代碼:str":"舉行「勞退新舊制相關修法」公聽會","屆":11,"會期":5,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"公聽會","委員會代碼":[26],"委員會代碼:str":["社會福利及衛生環境委員會"],"標題":"立法院第11屆第5會期社會福利及衛生環境委員會公聽會（事由：舉行「勞退新舊制相關修法」公聽會）"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2026-07-23T09:28:26+08:00","結束時間":"2026-07-23T09:38:28+08:00","影片長度":"00:10:02","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/7cefb85d66825e788609bffc4c5258a01fe01d9cd20695b3adb3df6c43a6c764f3b9796bc518a7b75ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"林月琴","委員發言時間":"09:28:26 - 09:38:28","會議時間":"2026-07-23T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"立法院第11屆第5會期社會福利及衛生環境委員會公聽會（事由：舉行「勞退新舊制相關修法」公聽會）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":0.63846875,"end":3.40596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":3.45659375,"end":3.4734687500000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":3.94596875,"end":11.590343750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":11.99534375,"end":21.68159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":22.27221875,"end":39.23159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":39.55221875,"end":44.985968750000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":45.205343750000004,"end":71.56409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":71.81721875000001,"end":75.91784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":76.59284375,"end":81.52034375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":82.17846875000001,"end":82.63409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":83.19096875000001,"end":83.81534375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":84.15284375,"end":85.89096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":86.95409375,"end":103.87971875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":104.43659375,"end":118.42596875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":118.88159375000001,"end":124.14659375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":124.51784375000001,"end":132.68534375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":132.78659375,"end":160.44471875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":160.88346875000002,"end":161.42346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":161.57534375,"end":174.28221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":174.63659375,"end":177.50534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":178.06221875,"end":234.34034375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":234.55971875,"end":238.10346875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":238.40721875000003,"end":239.60534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":240.07784375000003,"end":245.69721875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":246.13596875000002,"end":248.65034375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":248.81909375,"end":250.06784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":250.16909375,"end":268.83284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":269.11971875,"end":275.32971875000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":275.41409375,"end":280.15596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":280.66221875,"end":283.44659375000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":283.75034375,"end":290.09534375000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":290.44971875000005,"end":291.66471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":291.73221875,"end":299.64659375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":299.84909375,"end":313.68659375000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":314.09159375,"end":330.73034375000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":331.00034375,"end":353.12346875000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":354.37221875,"end":382.50284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":382.60409375,"end":404.03534375000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":404.33909375,"end":404.87909375000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":405.33471875000004,"end":405.60471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":405.85784375000003,"end":411.91596875000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":412.21971875,"end":418.07534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":418.44659375000003,"end":421.77096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":421.99034375,"end":426.52971875000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":426.93471875,"end":435.22034375000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":435.76034375,"end":461.19096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":461.68034375,"end":474.91034375000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":475.38284375,"end":478.08284375000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":478.30221875,"end":490.03034375000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":490.06409375000004,"end":505.80846875000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":506.29784375,"end":514.0265937500001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":514.22909375,"end":525.4340937500001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":526.0247187500001,"end":527.4422187499999},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":527.64471875,"end":530.02409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":530.32784375,"end":542.79846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":543.1865937499999,"end":547.87784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":547.9284687500001,"end":551.25284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":551.50596875,"end":555.35346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":556.04534375,"end":559.40346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":559.4540937500001,"end":561.52971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":561.8334687500001,"end":565.2422187500001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":566.5247187500001,"end":569.52846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":569.78159375,"end":571.62096875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":572.44784375,"end":578.9109687499999},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":579.06284375,"end":583.8215937500001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":584.3784687500001,"end":592.76534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":593.00159375,"end":593.57534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":594.58784375,"end":595.93784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":596.98409375,"end":598.92471875}],"whisperx":[{"start":0,"end":3.84,"text":"主席還有各位專家學者還有委員"},{"start":3.84,"end":8.44,"text":"還有在目前在均銜樓101外賓的"},{"start":8.44,"end":11.26,"text":"我們辛苦的勞工朋友們"},{"start":11.26,"end":16.64,"text":"那也感謝你們為台灣經濟跟社會安定撐起一片天"},{"start":16.64,"end":19.44,"text":"我覺得在五一勞動節的時候你們很辛苦"},{"start":19.44,"end":22.28,"text":"今天還是很辛苦的來到這邊"},{"start":22.28,"end":25.6,"text":"我覺得勞工有壓力大家政府就有責任"},{"start":25.68,"end":27.48,"text":"那勞工有不滿的話"},{"start":27.48,"end":30.92,"text":"我覺得政府應該要來出來面對"},{"start":30.92,"end":33.04,"text":"不能讓人家手上接頭"},{"start":33.04,"end":34.760000000000005,"text":"然後沒有辦法得到回應"},{"start":34.760000000000005,"end":38.64,"text":"尤其大家很關心的是退休之後不要不安心"},{"start":38.64,"end":41.480000000000004,"text":"那因為是工作一輩子"},{"start":41.480000000000004,"end":45.28,"text":"也不要等到老的時候才發現你少了很多保障"},{"start":45.28,"end":49.64,"text":"是有工作的人的話就應該有基本的保險"},{"start":49.64,"end":51.760000000000005,"text":"所以我們今天就要來談這個"},{"start":51.8,"end":54,"text":"大門都知道的確沒有錯"},{"start":54,"end":59.68,"text":"就是台灣大概去年是進入到超高齡的社會"},{"start":59.68,"end":66.03999999999999,"text":"那少子跟我們的高齡夾雜的是雙重老化的一個過程"},{"start":66.03999999999999,"end":69.64,"text":"那二零二八我們大概就進入到工作年齡"},{"start":69.64,"end":74.72,"text":"人口總人口的比例會跌破到三分之二以下"},{"start":74.72,"end":80.52,"text":"所以不再有對經濟發展有利的人口結構的時候"},{"start":80.52,"end":89.03999999999999,"text":"那當然我覺得整個的撥補或者是整個的財政都要去思考"},{"start":89.03999999999999,"end":94.03999999999999,"text":"不過我認為目前政府採取的撥補方式事實上是必要措施"},{"start":94.03999999999999,"end":96.91999999999999,"text":"但撥補不能解決勞工的根本問題"},{"start":96.91999999999999,"end":98.8,"text":"是暫時的做法"},{"start":98.8,"end":101.56,"text":"因為之後撥補的金額大致越來越高"},{"start":101.56,"end":102.47999999999999,"text":"因為為什麼"},{"start":102.47999999999999,"end":104.39999999999999,"text":"因為領的人越來越多"},{"start":104.39999999999999,"end":106.44,"text":"領的越來越久"},{"start":106.44,"end":108.36,"text":"繳的人卻是越來越少"},{"start":108.4,"end":112.76,"text":"而且我們繳的金額事實上是成長有限"},{"start":112.76,"end":114.96,"text":"因為當政府在撥補越高的時候"},{"start":114.96,"end":118.03999999999999,"text":"當然也會壓縮到其他的空間"},{"start":118.03999999999999,"end":124.48,"text":"所以去年立法院已經通過勞工保險條例的修正"},{"start":124.48,"end":127.24,"text":"把讓我們的撥補制度入法"},{"start":127.24,"end":132.2,"text":"也明定政府要負擔最後的支付責任"},{"start":132.2,"end":135.88,"text":"那也是有跨黨派的共識的一個政策"},{"start":135.92,"end":139.24,"text":"同時也讓一千多萬的勞工事實上"},{"start":139.24,"end":141.92,"text":"可以對我們的勞保基金有更多的信心"},{"start":141.92,"end":144.28,"text":"可是我要強調的是"},{"start":144.28,"end":146.6,"text":"另外除了提供保障"},{"start":146.6,"end":148.79999999999998,"text":"這修法除了提供保障以外"},{"start":148.79999999999998,"end":153.76,"text":"同時也明定政府要每三年來進行全面的財務的機制"},{"start":153.76,"end":155.48,"text":"不過也要提醒是"},{"start":155.48,"end":159.16,"text":"撥補不是我們的勞保財政問題的解方"},{"start":159.16,"end":160.88,"text":"那今天"},{"start":160.88,"end":163.56,"text":"今年預計撥補大概一千三百億"},{"start":163.6,"end":167.48,"text":"七年來政府大概撥補了五千一百七十億元"},{"start":167.48,"end":169.32,"text":"那當然學者也提醒是說"},{"start":169.32,"end":172.72,"text":"撥補只是一個持續擴大的財務缺口當中"},{"start":172.72,"end":174.68,"text":"先補這幾年的洞"},{"start":174.68,"end":177.08,"text":"不是長治久安的辦法"},{"start":177.08,"end":179,"text":"那因為我們當然知道"},{"start":179,"end":183.28,"text":"勞保事實上是世代互助風險風單的社會保險"},{"start":183.28,"end":185.6,"text":"那勞保制度的永續"},{"start":185.6,"end":190.2,"text":"最終還是要回到年金的財務結構跟制度上來討論"},{"start":190.2,"end":192.12,"text":"我認為有三個方向"},{"start":192.16,"end":194.92000000000002,"text":"我覺得勞動部要進一步的研擬"},{"start":194.92000000000002,"end":198.04,"text":"因為上次在五一勞動節他們走上街頭的時候"},{"start":198.04,"end":201.52,"text":"我就已經跟勞動部講說你們要開始去做"},{"start":201.52,"end":203.56,"text":"那之後我也收到你們的資料"},{"start":203.56,"end":206.24,"text":"可是我對這些資料我還是不能滿意"},{"start":206.24,"end":207.4,"text":"所以我覺得你們要研擬"},{"start":207.4,"end":208.16,"text":"第一個"},{"start":208.16,"end":212.04000000000002,"text":"你們因為我們的保險費率上限是12%"},{"start":212.04000000000002,"end":218.08,"text":"可是勞保的收支相等的那個平衡費率事實上是十七點九%"},{"start":218.08,"end":222.48000000000002,"text":"所以是不是要去討論我們的勞保險費率跟給付的調整"},{"start":222.48000000000002,"end":224.72000000000003,"text":"這個第一個你要去想"},{"start":224.72000000000003,"end":227.88000000000002,"text":"第二個是我們的投保薪資上限的調整"},{"start":227.88000000000002,"end":232.04000000000002,"text":"因為投保最高級距是四萬五千八百元"},{"start":232.04000000000002,"end":237.68,"text":"那勞工有三萬三十七萬三百七十一萬人"},{"start":237.68,"end":242.8,"text":"是這個佔了全體投保人數的三十五點一%"},{"start":242.8,"end":243.8,"text":"可是我們自己看"},{"start":243.8,"end":250.32000000000002,"text":"平均總薪資已到達了五萬七千兩百兩百二十三元"},{"start":250.32000000000002,"end":254.4,"text":"那表示三分之一的勞工的薪水是超過你最高級距的"},{"start":254.4,"end":257.72,"text":"那你要去研議討論這個課題"},{"start":257.72,"end":261.32,"text":"第三個可不可以考慮是稅收的改革"},{"start":261.32,"end":263.8,"text":"充實我們的財政的一個來源"},{"start":263.8,"end":267.72,"text":"比如增加富人稅或是財富稅來作為支撐社會保險的重要財源"},{"start":267.72,"end":272.32,"text":"像租稅、營所稅、屯屋稅、遺產稅的提高"},{"start":272.32,"end":274.84,"text":"這個都要作為你要去思考"},{"start":274.84,"end":276.64,"text":"否則一直在撥補的話"},{"start":276.64,"end":280.64,"text":"大概我剛剛講已經不是長治久安的方法"},{"start":280.64,"end":286.32,"text":"再來我想要談的是我們大家討論的那個勞退制度的問題"},{"start":286.32,"end":289.71999999999997,"text":"這也就是大家很關心的退休金是否足夠"},{"start":289.71999999999997,"end":291.08,"text":"因為年紀越大"},{"start":291.08,"end":293.03999999999996,"text":"當他離開職場的時候"},{"start":293.03999999999996,"end":295.03999999999996,"text":"他當然希望他要有個穩定生活"},{"start":295.03999999999996,"end":296.71999999999997,"text":"他已經工作了這麼多年"},{"start":296.71999999999997,"end":298.52,"text":"那不能給他穩定的生活"},{"start":298.52,"end":301.71999999999997,"text":"那他前面的為台灣社會付出的"},{"start":301.72,"end":305.44000000000005,"text":"難道不應該領有他該有的一個保障嗎"},{"start":305.44000000000005,"end":308.04,"text":"所以現行的我們的勞退的規定"},{"start":308.04,"end":312.04,"text":"顧主有義務為勞工我們的提撥退休金"},{"start":312.04,"end":315.68,"text":"因為民定不得低於原本的工資的6%"},{"start":315.68,"end":316.68,"text":"可是我們看起來"},{"start":316.68,"end":320.64000000000004,"text":"9成9的企業顧主就是剛剛好這個下限"},{"start":320.64000000000004,"end":321.72,"text":"也就是6%"},{"start":321.72,"end":324.84000000000003,"text":"原本立法設計事實上至少提撥6%"},{"start":324.84000000000003,"end":328.24,"text":"結果搞到最後大家顧就只提撥6%"},{"start":328.96000000000004,"end":332.40000000000003,"text":"所以我也要提行勞動部"},{"start":332.40000000000003,"end":335.44,"text":"因為之前在講這個課題的時候"},{"start":335.44,"end":339.04,"text":"都說要審慎評估持續收集意見"},{"start":339.04,"end":340.04,"text":"那我也要問說"},{"start":340.04,"end":341.8,"text":"那到底有沒有具體的作為"},{"start":341.8,"end":344.2,"text":"那收集的狀況是什麼"},{"start":344.2,"end":346.8,"text":"因為學者已經警示我們提"},{"start":346.8,"end":350.24,"text":"就是說你調高顧主的那個提繳率的話"},{"start":350.24,"end":353.24,"text":"可能會直接轉交到勞工的薪資身上"},{"start":354.24,"end":356.44,"text":"甚至現在狀況就是有人"},{"start":356.44,"end":360.76,"text":"把6%就還是放在勞工的薪水裡面內涵"},{"start":360.76,"end":363.36,"text":"這我覺得跟當初立法的用意"},{"start":363.36,"end":364.56,"text":"本來根本就不同"},{"start":364.56,"end":366.04,"text":"所以勞動部是不是要更積極"},{"start":366.04,"end":367.84,"text":"跟勞資雙方來對話"},{"start":367.84,"end":371.44,"text":"並搭配獎勵輔導措施來推動"},{"start":371.44,"end":373.15999999999997,"text":"才不會讓好意的政策"},{"start":373.15999999999997,"end":374.96,"text":"反而犧牲了勞工的權益"},{"start":374.96,"end":377.36,"text":"我已經多次呼籲勞動部"},{"start":377.36,"end":381.44,"text":"儘速提出分年試算跟產業衝擊的評估"},{"start":381.44,"end":385.4,"text":"不要再用持續收集意見審慎評估"},{"start":385.4,"end":387.32,"text":"來迴避這個問題"},{"start":387.32,"end":389.12,"text":"所以我認為"},{"start":389.12,"end":392.91999999999996,"text":"勞資雙方都需要看到具體的數據跟影響評估"},{"start":392.91999999999996,"end":396.32,"text":"才能夠繼續有辦法繼續討論下去"},{"start":396.32,"end":397.52,"text":"另外也就是"},{"start":397.52,"end":400.91999999999996,"text":"勞動部要積極推動自提的政策"},{"start":400.91999999999996,"end":402,"text":"雖然利益兩三"},{"start":402,"end":405.2,"text":"但是我比較擔心是逆分配的隱憂"},{"start":405.2,"end":406.52,"text":"為什麼"},{"start":406.52,"end":408,"text":"因為你看最新的數據"},{"start":408,"end":413.12,"text":"115年5月全體提繳人數的786萬人當中"},{"start":413.12,"end":418.44,"text":"有19.3%的勞工是參與我們個人的自願的提繳"},{"start":418.44,"end":419.52,"text":"為什麼會是這樣"},{"start":419.52,"end":422.04,"text":"最後就是有能力的才有辦法"},{"start":422.04,"end":426.92,"text":"那你的這個免稅金額是不是又是用在有能力的人身上"},{"start":426.92,"end":430.84000000000003,"text":"如果這種逆分配的狀況你沒有辦法解決的話"},{"start":430.84000000000003,"end":435.72,"text":"那最後是不是真的還事實上是沒有辦法讓"},{"start":435.72,"end":439.92,"text":"這個政策事實上是真的照顧到有需要的人"},{"start":439.92,"end":442.52,"text":"所以我認為政府在鼓勵自體的時候"},{"start":442.52,"end":444.64,"text":"同時要知道這種結構性的落差"},{"start":444.64,"end":447.84,"text":"思考如何讓領基本工資"},{"start":447.84,"end":450.12,"text":"沒有予以儀儲蓄的勞工"},{"start":450.12,"end":453.71999999999997,"text":"也能夠真正受益退休金制度的改善"},{"start":453.71999999999997,"end":458.52,"text":"而不是讓政策紅利子集中在少數人的身上"},{"start":458.52,"end":461.52,"text":"最後六個月資遣費夠嗎"},{"start":461.52,"end":464.03999999999996,"text":"因為中高齡的勞工說是不夠的"},{"start":464.03999999999996,"end":464.71999999999997,"text":"為什麼"},{"start":464.71999999999997,"end":466.32,"text":"因為資遣費不足了"},{"start":466.32,"end":467.71999999999997,"text":"因為最高你是六個月"},{"start":467.71999999999997,"end":471.32,"text":"對年資長的一個勞工是讓保障不足"},{"start":471.32,"end":473.52,"text":"尤其是對中高齡的勞工來說"},{"start":473.52,"end":478.32,"text":"這個保障已經跟不上我們現在實際的需要"},{"start":478.32,"end":480.92,"text":"今年五一勞動遊行當中"},{"start":480.92,"end":483.84,"text":"勞工團體認為現行的我們的勞資費"},{"start":483.84,"end":486.92,"text":"最高六個月的上限應該要調整了"},{"start":486.92,"end":488.71999999999997,"text":"因為在勞動市場上"},{"start":488.71999999999997,"end":493.92,"text":"你會越趨不穩定結構性失業風險增高的狀況底下"},{"start":493.92,"end":497.88,"text":"現行保障已經難以因應我們的勞工年老的時候"},{"start":497.88,"end":499.92,"text":"他經濟安全的需求"},{"start":499.92,"end":502.72,"text":"而且你去看勞動部自己做的一個調查"},{"start":502.72,"end":505.92,"text":"目前勞工的平均年資是8.3年"},{"start":505.92,"end":508.72,"text":"看起來好像12年是足夠"},{"start":508.72,"end":509.92,"text":"你可以領到六個月"},{"start":509.92,"end":511.72,"text":"可是同一份的調查也顯示"},{"start":511.72,"end":514.12,"text":"45歲到54歲的勞工"},{"start":514.12,"end":516.72,"text":"目前的工作平均是12.5年"},{"start":516.72,"end":519.9200000000001,"text":"55到64歲的大概15.8年"},{"start":519.9200000000001,"end":521.52,"text":"你年齡越長的話"},{"start":521.52,"end":523.52,"text":"他換工作的可能性不高"},{"start":523.52,"end":526.9200000000001,"text":"可是他最後一旦被資遣"},{"start":527.7199999999999,"end":531.12,"text":"近來我就很關心55歲被資遣"},{"start":531.12,"end":532.3199999999999,"text":"那他們拿到什麼"},{"start":532.3199999999999,"end":534.92,"text":"拿到還是一樣是六個月"},{"start":534.92,"end":538.12,"text":"我覺得這個真正逼近退休"},{"start":538.12,"end":541.12,"text":"所以最容易被資遣衝擊的中高齡的族群"},{"start":541.12,"end":546.3199999999999,"text":"他們實際的年資早就超過了你制度所謂涵蓋的範圍"},{"start":546.3199999999999,"end":547.92,"text":"所以我要提醒政府"},{"start":547.92,"end":549.92,"text":"中高齡勞工一旦被資遣"},{"start":549.92,"end":551.92,"text":"再就業真的不容易"},{"start":551.92,"end":553.3199999999999,"text":"所以我之前也要你們調查"},{"start":553.32,"end":557.32,"text":"到底55歲有沒有很多被所謂講優退"},{"start":557.32,"end":558.5200000000001,"text":"講得好聽叫優退"},{"start":558.5200000000001,"end":561.72,"text":"可是實際上拿到的那個也沒有讓"},{"start":561.72,"end":564.5200000000001,"text":"因為他要轉換其他行業根本就是不可能"},{"start":564.5200000000001,"end":568.12,"text":"所以當保障不足的制度"},{"start":568.12,"end":571.12,"text":"遇上再就業的困難的現實的話"},{"start":571.12,"end":575.72,"text":"這對於這群勞工來講是雙重的衝擊"},{"start":575.72,"end":579.72,"text":"我認為政府應該要針對資遣費上限來進行調整"},{"start":579.72,"end":585.12,"text":"尤其是應該正視我們的中高齡勞工的實際處境"},{"start":585.12,"end":589.32,"text":"我覺得讓最脆弱的一群人真的能夠獲得應有保障"},{"start":589.32,"end":592.9200000000001,"text":"不要再讓人家大熱天的還要再展出來"},{"start":592.9200000000001,"end":593.9200000000001,"text":"以上"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}