{"error":false,"id":["170708"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":170708,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/170708","日期":"2026-07-23","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"委員會-11-5-36-26","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第5會期司法及法制委員會第26次全體委員會議","屆":11,"會期":5,"會次":26,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"委員會","委員會代碼":[36],"委員會代碼:str":["司法及法制委員會"],"標題":"第11屆第5會期司法及法制委員會第26次全體委員會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2026-07-23T09:02:57+08:00","結束時間":"2026-07-23T09:05:28+08:00","影片長度":"00:02:31","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/7cefb85d66825e78fb7a2d5115b0669af952d29ff77f22d7390cec669743f780bb2b46c06798901d5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"陳昭姿","委員發言時間":"09:02:57 - 09:05:28","會議時間":"2026-07-23T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"立法院第11屆第5會期司法及法制委員會第26次全體委員會議（事由：一、邀請法務部部長、衛生福利部部長、司法院、行政院消費者保護處、衛生福利部食品藥物管理署就「中聯致癌油事件之偵辦調查、消費者權益及食安監管」進行專題報告，並備質詢。\n二、邀請監察院秘書長、法務部部長、經濟部部長、國家發展委員會主任委員、銓敘部部長就「現行公職人員利益衝突迴避暨離職公務員旋轉門機制之執行成效與法制缺失」進行專題報告，並備質詢。\n【7月22日及23日兩天一次會】）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":0.03096875,"end":2.83221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":0.31784375,"end":0.72284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":3.5578437500000004,"end":14.442218750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":14.560343750000001,"end":23.622218750000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":23.89221875,"end":30.456593750000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":30.96284375,"end":57.60846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":57.79409375,"end":67.21034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":67.69971875,"end":69.03284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":69.10034375000001,"end":76.84596875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":75.73221875,"end":76.13721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":77.28471875000001,"end":80.15346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":81.03096875,"end":86.97096875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":87.47721875,"end":100.80846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":101.17971875,"end":107.27159375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":107.37284375,"end":115.03409375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":115.25346875000001,"end":120.90659375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":121.66596875,"end":150.23534375}],"whisperx":[{"start":0,"end":2.7600000000000002,"text":"主席請 對 我想要做程序發言"},{"start":2.7600000000000002,"end":4.76,"text":"好 那主席各位"},{"start":4.76,"end":6.76,"text":"今天司法法制委員會"},{"start":6.76,"end":8.76,"text":"排定專題報告"},{"start":8.76,"end":10.76,"text":"要求監察院國會會議跟經濟部等機關"},{"start":10.76,"end":14.76,"text":"要針對國發基金及政府補助不當益助"},{"start":14.76,"end":18.76,"text":"蘇小純相關公司的爭議提出檢討跟說明"},{"start":18.76,"end":21.76,"text":"但監察院不僅沒有提出書面報告"},{"start":21.76,"end":23.76,"text":"甚至連一名代表都不出席"},{"start":23.76,"end":25.76,"text":"這面對國會監督機"},{"start":25.76,"end":27.76,"text":"人民對公帑留下的質疑"},{"start":27.76,"end":30.76,"text":"監察院竟然選擇集體消失"},{"start":30.76,"end":32.760000000000005,"text":"這不是行政疏失"},{"start":32.760000000000005,"end":34.760000000000005,"text":"而是公然藐視國會 逃避監督"},{"start":34.760000000000005,"end":37.760000000000005,"text":"我們要問監察院你在怕什麼"},{"start":37.760000000000005,"end":40.760000000000005,"text":"蘇小純擔任董事監理院長的礦事智能"},{"start":40.760000000000005,"end":42.760000000000005,"text":"再其副蘇貞昌擔任行政院長期間"},{"start":42.760000000000005,"end":45.760000000000005,"text":"獲國發基金會將近兩千萬的補助"},{"start":45.760000000000005,"end":47.760000000000005,"text":"與蘇小純及SWAP"},{"start":47.760000000000005,"end":49.760000000000005,"text":"AkaSWAP營運並線相關的微弩課金"},{"start":49.760000000000005,"end":52.760000000000005,"text":"也取得經濟部跟文化部將近六百萬的補助"},{"start":52.760000000000005,"end":55.760000000000005,"text":"相關的公司關心資金流向投注"},{"start":55.76,"end":58.76,"text":"補助跟投資關係之間的時間點"},{"start":58.76,"end":61.76,"text":"是否有依照公職人員利益衝突迴避法"},{"start":61.76,"end":64.75999999999999,"text":"來著重揭露白紙黑字是證據在"},{"start":64.75999999999999,"end":68.75999999999999,"text":"絕對不是一句烏龍爆料可以補助的"},{"start":68.75999999999999,"end":71.75999999999999,"text":"監察院長理彈劾糾舉跟審計"},{"start":71.75999999999999,"end":74.75999999999999,"text":"更有責任調查公職人員利益衝突案件"},{"start":74.75999999999999,"end":76.75999999999999,"text":"平常查基層人員"},{"start":76.75999999999999,"end":78.75999999999999,"text":"監察院動作很快"},{"start":78.75999999999999,"end":81.75999999999999,"text":"碰到在野黨聲色俱利"},{"start":81.75999999999999,"end":83.75999999999999,"text":"一碰到綠色權貴"},{"start":83.76,"end":85.76,"text":"整個家族立刻轉彎"},{"start":85.76,"end":87.76,"text":"整個虛掉了"},{"start":87.76,"end":89.76,"text":"所以我們要求"},{"start":89.76,"end":91.76,"text":"本席提出三點要求"},{"start":91.76,"end":93.76,"text":"既然監察院拒絕到場"},{"start":93.76,"end":94.76,"text":"不讓問題消失"},{"start":94.76,"end":95.76,"text":"不會讓問題消失的"},{"start":95.76,"end":98.76,"text":"只會證明所謂的獨立行使權"},{"start":98.76,"end":101.76,"text":"受到綠色權貴的面前"},{"start":101.76,"end":103.76,"text":"就變成選擇性的失憶"},{"start":103.76,"end":105.76,"text":"選擇性的失明"},{"start":105.76,"end":107.76,"text":"選擇性的失職"},{"start":107.76,"end":109.76,"text":"所以第一我們請主席才是"},{"start":109.76,"end":111.76,"text":"嚴正譴責監察院聚焦書面報告"},{"start":111.76,"end":114.76,"text":"具派代表練習並列入委員會的公告"},{"start":114.76,"end":116.76,"text":"第二要求監察院現期補充"},{"start":116.76,"end":117.76,"text":"完整的報告"},{"start":117.76,"end":119.76,"text":"說明是否受理立案"},{"start":119.76,"end":122.76,"text":"以及目前的辦理進度"},{"start":122.76,"end":125.76,"text":"第三另外定期再次邀請"},{"start":125.76,"end":127.76,"text":"這個監察院練習"},{"start":127.76,"end":128.76,"text":"如果拒絕再出席的話"},{"start":128.76,"end":131.76,"text":"應該將相關預算及適職責任"},{"start":131.76,"end":133.76,"text":"列為後續審查及究責的事項"},{"start":133.76,"end":135.76,"text":"國會監督"},{"start":135.76,"end":136.76,"text":"不是請客吃飯"},{"start":136.76,"end":139.76,"text":"公堂也不是權貴家族的提款機"},{"start":139.76,"end":141.76,"text":"監察院你可以今天迴避會議"},{"start":141.76,"end":143.76,"text":"這逃不過人民的檢驗"},{"start":143.76,"end":145.76,"text":"請監察院停止護航"},{"start":145.76,"end":147.76,"text":"立即出面說明查明白"},{"start":147.76,"end":149.76,"text":"給人民一個交代"},{"start":149.76,"end":151.76,"text":"以上"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}