{"error":false,"id":["170803"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":170803,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/170803","日期":"2026-08-04","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"院會-11-5-20","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第5會期第20次會議","屆":11,"會期":5,"會次":20,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"院會","標題":"第11屆第5會期第20次會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2026-08-04T09:28:23+08:00","結束時間":"2026-08-04T09:30:42+08:00","影片長度":"00:02:19","支援功能":["ai-transcript","gazette"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/6ac536e1086c3ba5cf83f77f75355c4c91be3aa067f8a0ba69ffa6b74f7da81ab2462f6caa9091c65ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"翁曉玲","委員發言時間":"09:28:23 - 09:30:42","會議時間":"2026-08-04T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第5會期第20次會議（事由：一、討論事項：本院民進黨黨團，針對第11屆第5會期第18次會議報告事項第87案國民黨黨團擬具「公民投票法第二十一條、第二十三條及第四十三條條文修正草案」院會所作之決定提出復議。是否有當？請公決案等8案。二、7月31日上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"翁委員曉玲","start":9.19409375,"end":78.49971875,"speaker_score":0.957},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"翁委員曉玲","start":78.78659375000001,"end":87.20721875000001,"speaker_score":0.957},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"翁委員曉玲","start":88.06784375000001,"end":99.47534375000001,"speaker_score":0.957},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"翁委員曉玲","start":100.28534375000001,"end":108.63846875,"speaker_score":0.957},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"翁委員曉玲","start":108.95909375000001,"end":132.12846875,"speaker_score":0.957},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"翁委員曉玲","start":133.44471875000002,"end":134.99721875,"speaker_score":0.957},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"翁委員曉玲","start":137.10659375,"end":137.79846875,"speaker_score":0.957},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"翁委員曉玲","start":138.25409375,"end":138.64221875,"speaker_score":0.957}],"whisperx":[{"start":0,"end":12,"text":"主席還有在座的各位委員大家好"},{"start":12,"end":14.5,"text":"我們曉得實施超過二十年"},{"start":14.5,"end":17.5,"text":"號稱媒體緊箍咒的黨政軍退出媒體條款"},{"start":17.5,"end":20.5,"text":"終於在今年此時有了重大的突破"},{"start":20.5,"end":23.5,"text":"長期以來不合時宜的管制規定"},{"start":23.5,"end":25,"text":"被大幅度的修正"},{"start":25,"end":28.5,"text":"我們知道原來制定黨政軍退出媒體條款的目的"},{"start":28.5,"end":31,"text":"主要是希望政府跟政黨之手"},{"start":31,"end":33,"text":"不要去干預媒體介入媒體"},{"start":33,"end":37,"text":"但是給媒體一個獨立自主的空間"},{"start":37,"end":41,"text":"然而這項條款從2006年正式實施之後"},{"start":41,"end":45,"text":"不僅無法真正遏止政府和政黨不控制媒體"},{"start":45,"end":47.5,"text":"反而出現了許多管制的亂象"},{"start":47.5,"end":50,"text":"譬如說裁罰對象錯誤"},{"start":50,"end":51.5,"text":"他不處罰投資人"},{"start":51.5,"end":54,"text":"卻處罰被投資的廣電媒體業者"},{"start":54,"end":58,"text":"而且這項規定也成為了業界惡意競爭"},{"start":58,"end":59.5,"text":"攻擊對手的武器"},{"start":59.5,"end":62.5,"text":"因此本次修法最主要的目的"},{"start":62.5,"end":65.5,"text":"就是要去修正這個罰則的盲點"},{"start":65.5,"end":67.5,"text":"同時管制鬆綁"},{"start":67.5,"end":70.5,"text":"也的確有助於引進資金活水"},{"start":70.5,"end":73,"text":"可以改善媒體產業的環境"},{"start":73,"end":76.5,"text":"對於有462家各類的廣電媒體業者"},{"start":76.5,"end":78.5,"text":"是有非常大的注意"},{"start":78.5,"end":79.5,"text":"但是我們今天三讀"},{"start":79.5,"end":82.5,"text":"通過了廣播電視法的規定"},{"start":82.5,"end":87.5,"text":"現在令人質疑的是卓榮泰會復屬嗎"},{"start":88,"end":90,"text":"到目前為止可能還是未知數"},{"start":90,"end":91.5,"text":"因為在今年1月"},{"start":91.5,"end":93,"text":"通過的衛星廣播電視法的"},{"start":93,"end":95,"text":"黨政軍退出媒體條款"},{"start":95,"end":98,"text":"到現在為止卓榮泰還沒有復屬"},{"start":98,"end":100,"text":"賴清德還沒有公佈"},{"start":100,"end":103,"text":"像這種拿法案作為政治報復"},{"start":103,"end":106,"text":"政治對抗是法治於無誤的行政院院長"},{"start":106,"end":109,"text":"台灣還需要立法院嗎"},{"start":109,"end":110,"text":"本席要說的是"},{"start":110,"end":112.5,"text":"今天立法院已經竭盡所能的"},{"start":112.5,"end":114,"text":"為所有的廣電媒體業者"},{"start":114,"end":116,"text":"去排除法律障礙"},{"start":116,"end":119.5,"text":"但是如果卓榮泰仍然拒不復屬法律"},{"start":119.5,"end":121.5,"text":"賴清德仍然不公佈法律"},{"start":121.5,"end":123,"text":"那麼接下來就要看"},{"start":123,"end":126,"text":"廣電業者是否要尋求自立救濟了"},{"start":126,"end":129,"text":"別忘了抗議庫斯拉的行政院長"},{"start":129,"end":131,"text":"是媒體業者你們的權利"},{"start":131,"end":133,"text":"以上謝謝"}],"gazette":[{"speaker":"翁委員曉玲","start":"2026-08-04T09:28:23+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-04T09:28:34.142857+08:00","text":"主席以及在座的各位委員，大家好！","quality":0.857},{"speaker":"翁委員曉玲","start":"2026-08-04T09:28:35+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-04T09:28:47.785714+08:00","text":"我們曉得實施超過20年、號稱媒體緊箍咒的黨政軍退出媒體條款終於在今年此時有了重大的突破，長期以來不合時宜的管制規定被大幅度的修正。","quality":1},{"speaker":"翁委員曉玲","start":"2026-08-04T09:28:48+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-04T09:29:22.285714+08:00","text":"我們知道原來制定黨政軍退出媒體條款的目的，主要是希望政府跟政黨之手不要去干預媒體、介入媒體，給媒體一個獨立自主的空間，然而這項條款從2006年正式實施之後，不僅無法真正遏止政府和政黨不控制媒體，反而出現了許多管制的亂象，譬如說裁罰對象錯誤，不處罰投資人，卻處罰被投資的廣電媒體業者，而且這項規定也成為了業界惡意競爭、攻擊對手的武器。","quality":1},{"speaker":"翁委員曉玲","start":"2026-08-04T09:29:22.500000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-04T09:29:40.750000+08:00","text":"因此，本次修法最主要的目的就是要去修正這個罰則的盲點，同時，管制鬆綁也的確有助於引進資金活水，可以改善媒體產業的環境，對於462家各類廣電媒體業者有非常大的助益。","quality":0.972},{"speaker":"翁委員曉玲","start":"2026-08-04T09:29:41.750000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-04T09:29:50.166667+08:00","text":"雖然我們今天三讀通過了廣播電視法的規定，但現在令人質疑的是，卓榮泰會副署嗎？","quality":0.857},{"speaker":"翁委員曉玲","start":"2026-08-04T09:29:51+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-04T09:29:52.833333+08:00","text":"到目前為止，可能還是未知數。","quality":1},{"speaker":"翁委員曉玲","start":"2026-08-04T09:29:53+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-04T09:30:02.500000+08:00","text":"因為在今年1月通過的衛星廣播電視法黨政軍退出媒體條款，到現在為止，卓榮泰還沒有副署，賴清德還沒有公布。","quality":0.935},{"speaker":"翁委員曉玲","start":"2026-08-04T09:30:03+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-04T09:30:11.666667+08:00","text":"像這種拿法案作為政治報復、政治對抗，視法制於無物的行政院院長，臺灣還需要立法院嗎？","quality":0.919},{"speaker":"翁委員曉玲","start":"2026-08-04T09:30:12+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-04T09:30:28.785714+08:00","text":"本席要說的是，今天立法院已經竭盡所能的為所有廣電媒體業者排除法律障礙，如果卓榮泰仍然拒不副署法律，賴清德仍然不公布法律，那麼接下來就要看廣電業者是否要尋求自力與救濟了。","quality":0.937},{"speaker":"翁委員曉玲","start":"2026-08-04T09:30:29+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-04T09:30:33.800000+08:00","text":"別忘了，抗議酷斯拉的行政院長是媒體業者你們的權利！","quality":0.957},{"speaker":"翁委員曉玲","start":"2026-08-04T09:30:34+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-04T09:30:35.500000+08:00","text":"以上，謝謝。","quality":1},{"speaker":"主席","start":"2026-08-04T09:30:36+08:00","guessed":true,"end":"2026-08-04T09:30:37.428571+08:00","text":"謝謝翁委員。","quality":0},{"speaker":"主席","start":"2026-08-04T09:30:37.728571+08:00","guessed":true,"end":"2026-08-04T09:30:42.014286+08:00","text":"報告院會，登記發言委員已發言完畢。","quality":0},{"speaker":"主席","start":"2026-08-04T09:30:42.314286+08:00","guessed":true,"end":"2026-08-04T09:30:45.457143+08:00","text":"現在進行討論事項第六案。","quality":0},{"speaker":"主席","start":"2026-08-04T09:30:45.757143+08:00","guessed":true,"end":"2026-08-04T09:30:56.614286+08:00","text":"六、本院內政委員會報告審查客家委員會函送財團法人客家公共傳播基金會115年度預算書案。","quality":0},{"speaker":"主席","start":"2026-08-04T09:30:56.914286+08:00","guessed":true,"end":"2026-08-04T09:31:04.628571+08:00","text":"（本案經提本院第11屆第4會期第2次會議報告決定：交內政委員會審查。","quality":0},{"speaker":"主席","start":"2026-08-04T09:31:04.928571+08:00","guessed":true,"end":"2026-08-04T09:31:08.928571+08:00","text":"茲接報告，爰於本次會議提出討論。）","quality":0}]},"gazette":{"lineno":260,"blocks":[["翁委員曉玲：（9時28分）主席以及在座的各位委員，大家好！我們曉得實施超過20年、號稱媒體緊箍咒的黨政軍退出媒體條款終於在今年此時有了重大的突破，長期以來不合時宜的管制規定被大幅度的修正。我們知道原來制定黨政軍退出媒體條款的目的，主要是希望政府跟政黨之手不要去干預媒體、介入媒體，給媒體一個獨立自主的空間，然而這項條款從2006年正式實施之後，不僅無法真正遏止政府和政黨不控制媒體，反而出現了許多管制的亂象，譬如說裁罰對象錯誤，不處罰投資人，卻處罰被投資的廣電媒體業者，而且這項規定也成為了業界惡意競爭、攻擊對手的武器。因此，本次修法最主要的目的就是要去修正這個罰則的盲點，同時，管制鬆綁也的確有助於引進資金活水，可以改善媒體產業的環境，對於462家各類廣電媒體業者有非常大的助益。","雖然我們今天三讀通過了廣播電視法的規定，但現在令人質疑的是，卓榮泰會副署嗎？到目前為止，可能還是未知數。因為在今年1月通過的衛星廣播電視法黨政軍退出媒體條款，到現在為止，卓榮泰還沒有副署，賴清德還沒有公布。像這種拿法案作為政治報復、政治對抗，視法制於無物的行政院院長，臺灣還需要立法院嗎？本席要說的是，今天立法院已經竭盡所能的為所有廣電媒體業者排除法律障礙，如果卓榮泰仍然拒不副署法律，賴清德仍然不公布法律，那麼接下來就要看廣電業者是否要尋求自力與救濟了。別忘了，抗議酷斯拉的行政院長是媒體業者你們的權利！以上，謝謝。"],["主席：謝謝翁委員。","報告院會，登記發言委員已發言完畢。","現在進行討論事項第六案。","六、本院內政委員會報告審查客家委員會函送財團法人客家公共傳播基金會115年度預算書案。（本案經提本院第11屆第4會期第2次會議報告決定：交內政委員會審查。茲接報告，爰於本次會議提出討論。）"]],"agenda":{"page_end":56,"meet_id":"院會-11-5-20","speakers":["江啟臣"],"page_start":39,"meetingDate":["2026-08-04"],"gazette_id":"1156601","agenda_lcidc_ids":["1156601_00003"],"meet_name":"立法院第11屆第5會期第20次會議紀錄","content":"討論事項\n總統副總統選舉罷免法修正第二十六條條文─完成三讀─","agenda_id":"1156601_00006"}}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}