{"error":false,"id":["170803"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":170803,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/170803","日期":"2026-08-04","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"院會-11-5-20","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第5會期第20次會議","屆":11,"會期":5,"會次":20,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"院會","標題":"第11屆第5會期第20次會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2026-08-04T09:28:23+08:00","結束時間":"2026-08-04T09:30:42+08:00","影片長度":"00:02:19","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/6ac536e1086c3ba5cf83f77f75355c4c91be3aa067f8a0ba69ffa6b74f7da81ab2462f6caa9091c65ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"翁曉玲","委員發言時間":"09:28:23 - 09:30:42","會議時間":"2026-08-04T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第5會期第20次會議（事由：一、討論事項：本院民進黨黨團，針對第11屆第5會期第18次會議報告事項第87案國民黨黨團擬具「公民投票法第二十一條、第二十三條及第四十三條條文修正草案」院會所作之決定提出復議。是否有當？請公決案等8案。二、7月31日上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":9.19409375,"end":78.49971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":78.78659375000001,"end":87.20721875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":88.06784375000001,"end":99.47534375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":100.28534375000001,"end":108.63846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":108.95909375000001,"end":132.12846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":133.44471875000002,"end":134.99721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":137.10659375,"end":137.79846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":138.25409375,"end":138.64221875}],"whisperx":[{"start":0,"end":12,"text":"主席還有在座的各位委員大家好"},{"start":12,"end":14.5,"text":"我們曉得實施超過二十年"},{"start":14.5,"end":17.5,"text":"號稱媒體緊箍咒的黨政軍退出媒體條款"},{"start":17.5,"end":20.5,"text":"終於在今年此時有了重大的突破"},{"start":20.5,"end":23.5,"text":"長期以來不合時宜的管制規定"},{"start":23.5,"end":25,"text":"被大幅度的修正"},{"start":25,"end":28.5,"text":"我們知道原來制定黨政軍退出媒體條款的目的"},{"start":28.5,"end":31,"text":"主要是希望政府跟政黨之手"},{"start":31,"end":33,"text":"不要去干預媒體介入媒體"},{"start":33,"end":37,"text":"但是給媒體一個獨立自主的空間"},{"start":37,"end":41,"text":"然而這項條款從2006年正式實施之後"},{"start":41,"end":45,"text":"不僅無法真正遏止政府和政黨不控制媒體"},{"start":45,"end":47.5,"text":"反而出現了許多管制的亂象"},{"start":47.5,"end":50,"text":"譬如說裁罰對象錯誤"},{"start":50,"end":51.5,"text":"他不處罰投資人"},{"start":51.5,"end":54,"text":"卻處罰被投資的廣電媒體業者"},{"start":54,"end":58,"text":"而且這項規定也成為了業界惡意競爭"},{"start":58,"end":59.5,"text":"攻擊對手的武器"},{"start":59.5,"end":62.5,"text":"因此本次修法最主要的目的"},{"start":62.5,"end":65.5,"text":"就是要去修正這個罰則的盲點"},{"start":65.5,"end":67.5,"text":"同時管制鬆綁"},{"start":67.5,"end":70.5,"text":"也的確有助於引進資金活水"},{"start":70.5,"end":73,"text":"可以改善媒體產業的環境"},{"start":73,"end":76.5,"text":"對於有462家各類的廣電媒體業者"},{"start":76.5,"end":78.5,"text":"是有非常大的注意"},{"start":78.5,"end":79.5,"text":"但是我們今天三讀"},{"start":79.5,"end":82.5,"text":"通過了廣播電視法的規定"},{"start":82.5,"end":87.5,"text":"現在令人質疑的是卓榮泰會復屬嗎"},{"start":88,"end":90,"text":"到目前為止可能還是未知數"},{"start":90,"end":91.5,"text":"因為在今年1月"},{"start":91.5,"end":93,"text":"通過的衛星廣播電視法的"},{"start":93,"end":95,"text":"黨政軍退出媒體條款"},{"start":95,"end":98,"text":"到現在為止卓榮泰還沒有復屬"},{"start":98,"end":100,"text":"賴清德還沒有公佈"},{"start":100,"end":103,"text":"像這種拿法案作為政治報復"},{"start":103,"end":106,"text":"政治對抗是法治於無誤的行政院院長"},{"start":106,"end":109,"text":"台灣還需要立法院嗎"},{"start":109,"end":110,"text":"本席要說的是"},{"start":110,"end":112.5,"text":"今天立法院已經竭盡所能的"},{"start":112.5,"end":114,"text":"為所有的廣電媒體業者"},{"start":114,"end":116,"text":"去排除法律障礙"},{"start":116,"end":119.5,"text":"但是如果卓榮泰仍然拒不復屬法律"},{"start":119.5,"end":121.5,"text":"賴清德仍然不公佈法律"},{"start":121.5,"end":123,"text":"那麼接下來就要看"},{"start":123,"end":126,"text":"廣電業者是否要尋求自立救濟了"},{"start":126,"end":129,"text":"別忘了抗議庫斯拉的行政院長"},{"start":129,"end":131,"text":"是媒體業者你們的權利"},{"start":131,"end":133,"text":"以上謝謝"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}