{"error":false,"id":["170824"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":170824,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/170824","日期":"2026-08-05","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"委員會-11-5-26-22","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第5會期社會福利及衛生環境委員會第22次全體委員會議","屆":11,"會期":5,"會次":22,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"委員會","委員會代碼":[26],"委員會代碼:str":["社會福利及衛生環境委員會"],"標題":"第11屆第5會期社會福利及衛生環境委員會第22次全體委員會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2026-08-05T10:24:57+08:00","結束時間":"2026-08-05T10:33:59+08:00","影片長度":"00:09:02","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/d053bb9b075f6aea92d922dc3a58df9acd75ebd3fcd1029c9e152d6567b454d3a1134436d75394885ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"林月琴","委員發言時間":"10:24:57 - 10:33:59","會議時間":"2026-08-05T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"立法院第11屆第5會期社會福利及衛生環境委員會第22次全體委員會議（事由：（上午9時起）\n邀請衛生福利部部長、行政院食品安全辦公室、教育部、國防部、經濟部、台灣糖業股份有限公司及行政院消費者保護處就「從致癌油事件發展迄今，中央一味『蓋牌、吃案、當門神』有關行政究責之重做完整調查報告(含台糖失職、食安警訊斷鏈責任、團體訴訟求償進度)及未來如何確保安全無虞的國軍團膳、學生營養午餐」進行專題報告，並備質詢。\n（下午2時30分起，若上午議程尚未結束，待結束後接續召開）\n一、審查行政院函請審議「食品安全衛生管理法部分條文修正草案」案。\n二、繼續審查委員廖偉翔等18人擬具「食品安全衛生管理法第二十四條及第二十五條條文修正草案」案。\n三、繼續審查委員蘇清泉等23人擬具「食品安全衛生管理法第二十二條條文修正草案」案。\n四、繼續審查委員蘇清泉等20人擬具「食品安全衛生管理法第四條條文修正草案」案。\n......（完整內容，詳見議事日程）\n二十、審查委員許宇甄等16人擬具「食品安全衛生管理法第二十二條條文修正草案」案。\n二十一、審查委員郭國文等18人擬具「食品安全衛生管理法第七條及第四十八條之一條文修正草案」案。\n二十二、審查國民黨黨團擬具「食品安全衛生管理法部分條文修正草案」案。\n二十三、審查委員黃健豪等16人擬具「食品安全衛生管理法部分條文修正草案」案。\n二十四、審查委員廖偉翔等19人擬具「食品安全衛生管理法第七條及第四十七條條文修正草案」案。\n二十五、審查委員李彥秀等23人擬具「食品安全衛生管理法部分條文修正草案」案。\n二十六、審查委員羅智強等17人擬具「食品安全衛生管理法部分條文修正草案」案。\n二十七、審查委員盧縣一等16人擬具「食品安全衛生管理法部分條文修正草案」案。\n二十八、審查委員伍麗華Saidhai Tahovecahe等16人擬具「食品安全衛生管理法部分條文修正草案」案。\n二十九、審查委員許宇甄等20人擬具「食品安全衛生管理法部分條文修正草案」案。\n三十、審查委員王育敏等25人擬具「食品安全衛生管理法部分條文修正草案」案。\n三十一、審查委員徐巧芯等17人擬具「食品安全衛生管理法部分條文修正草案」案。\n三十二、審查委員林月琴等24人擬具「食品安全衛生管理法部分條文修正草案」案。\n三十三、審查委員林淑芬等21人擬具「食品安全衛生管理法部分條文修正草案」案。\n三十四、審查委員鄭天財Sra Kacaw等16人擬具「食品安全衛生管理法部分條文修正草案」案。\n三十五、審查委員李坤城等18人擬具「食品安全衛生管理法部分條文修正草案」案。\n三十六、審查委員黃秀芳等21人擬具「食品安全衛生管理法部分條文修正草案」案。\n三十七、審查委員劉建國等19人擬具「食品安全衛生管理法部分條文修正草案」案。\n【逐條討論，不詢答】\n【第二十至二十二案，如經復議則不予審查；第一案及第二十三至三十七案，如未經院會交付本會審查或未經各黨團簽署不復議同意）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":3.6759687500000005,"end":5.228468750000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":5.81909375,"end":15.032843750000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":15.032843750000001,"end":37.98284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":26.997218750000002,"end":27.874718750000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":37.98284375,"end":52.242218750000006},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":46.21784375,"end":46.555343750000006},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":50.149718750000005,"end":50.53784375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":52.39409375,"end":126.84659375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":127.06596875000001,"end":127.45409375000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":128.06159375000001,"end":129.14159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":129.37784375,"end":142.81034375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":143.31659375,"end":149.93159375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":149.93159375000002,"end":149.96534375000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":150.62346875,"end":215.32221875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":163.02659375000002,"end":163.58346875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":180.67784375000002,"end":181.01534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":215.86221875,"end":232.63596875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":232.63596875000002,"end":233.19284375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":232.65284375000002,"end":267.97221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":267.97221875,"end":274.16534375000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":274.43534375,"end":361.96596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":361.96596875,"end":365.74596875000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":365.94846875,"end":366.94409375000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":367.50096875,"end":374.90909375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":375.46596875,"end":431.54159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":429.44909375000003,"end":432.46971875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":432.94221875000005,"end":457.10721875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":458.37284375,"end":479.66909375000006},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":480.93471875000006,"end":496.34159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":496.71284375000005,"end":500.94846875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":501.20159375000003,"end":505.87596875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":506.24721875000006,"end":508.10346875000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":508.49159375000005,"end":519.02159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":519.03846875,"end":519.61221875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":519.61221875,"end":520.2365937500001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":520.6922187499999,"end":537.5672187499999},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":537.5672187499999,"end":537.9722187500001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":537.9722187500001,"end":540.3178437500001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","start":540.41909375,"end":542.10659375}],"whisperx":[{"start":0,"end":5,"text":"主席謝謝"},{"start":5,"end":12,"text":"部長繼續講一下 我剛問的是說有沒有用到這批問題油"},{"start":12,"end":14,"text":"然後台湯的油是安全的嗎"},{"start":14,"end":24,"text":"跟委員說明 這一批不符合台湯的運收標準的脫膠原油"},{"start":24,"end":28,"text":"至今還在台中的中聯"},{"start":28,"end":32,"text":"台中市衛生局也是有封存"},{"start":32,"end":38,"text":"所以這個部分是沒有流入到我們的食品加工鏈裡面的"},{"start":38,"end":43,"text":"所以台湯是在中聯公司發現油品異常後 第一時間就拒收了"},{"start":43,"end":47,"text":"那這批油現在目前也留在我們的中聯油廠內"},{"start":47,"end":50,"text":"沒有送到台湯的高雄廠 也沒有投入生產"},{"start":50,"end":53,"text":"也沒有流入消費市場 是不是"},{"start":53,"end":57,"text":"可是另外一家南橋 以致中聯油的油品有問題"},{"start":57,"end":60,"text":"能把中聯的問題油買回去"},{"start":60,"end":65,"text":"沒有依法通報 所以違反了食安法然後受罰"},{"start":65,"end":68,"text":"所以我們得到的第一個結論就是"},{"start":68,"end":74,"text":"台湯拒收問題原料 所以沒有產出問題油的相關產品"},{"start":74,"end":81,"text":"南橋是收購問題油持續使用 這應該是最大的差異"},{"start":81,"end":83,"text":"接下來我們大家就會很關心的問題就是說"},{"start":83,"end":86,"text":"為什麼台湯不用通報"},{"start":86,"end":89,"text":"現在就幫大家問清楚 首先我們來看法規"},{"start":89,"end":92,"text":"第一個 從中央法規的角度來看"},{"start":92,"end":98,"text":"依照現行的食安法 台湯是在原料端檢驗時發現油品異常"},{"start":98,"end":103,"text":"當下就拒收中聯油提供的半純品"},{"start":103,"end":106,"text":"這批油沒有進入到台湯工廠 沒有投入製程"},{"start":106,"end":110,"text":"更沒有成為食品進入市場"},{"start":110,"end":115,"text":"再來就是從地方主管機關 台南跟高雄的自製法規來看"},{"start":115,"end":121,"text":"這也並非台南市食品安全管理自製條例第八條所稱的食品"},{"start":121,"end":127,"text":"也因為它驗的事實上是脫膠原油 可以作為食用油和工業品"},{"start":127,"end":134,"text":"那比衛生標準適用對象必須要可直接供人使用"},{"start":134,"end":136,"text":"或直接作為食品加供用"},{"start":136,"end":140,"text":"所以因此台湯並無該條例通報義務的適用"},{"start":140,"end":143,"text":"請問部長 從這兩個法規層面來看"},{"start":143,"end":146,"text":"台湯是否真的具有通報的義務"},{"start":146,"end":150,"text":"和你們當初解釋蘇丹紅是同一個樣態嗎"},{"start":150,"end":153,"text":"好 我再跟委員仔細的說明"},{"start":153,"end":158,"text":"就要先看這個食安法的第三條的名詞定義"},{"start":158,"end":163,"text":"在名詞定義所稱的食品 是包含了產品及其原料"},{"start":163,"end":166,"text":"所以產品跟原料是分開的"},{"start":166,"end":169,"text":"從第三條的名詞定義寫得很清楚"},{"start":169,"end":172,"text":"那麼通報是寫在第七條的第五項"},{"start":172,"end":177,"text":"指的是產品有健康危害之餘的通報"},{"start":177,"end":180,"text":"所以如果就法論法當然它是不包含原料"},{"start":180,"end":185,"text":"所以這個是法規上未來要不要進行食安法的修法"},{"start":185,"end":189,"text":"把原料 半成品都納入 這個是可以來討論"},{"start":189,"end":194,"text":"不過主管機關依法行政的角度來看確實是如此"},{"start":194,"end":196,"text":"那麼這個是第一個"},{"start":196,"end":200,"text":"第二個呢 我們所定的扁平比的標準"},{"start":200,"end":204,"text":"是按照食安法第17條所定出的標準"},{"start":204,"end":208,"text":"指的是實用油脂的扁平比標準"},{"start":208,"end":214,"text":"我們並不是去定原料或半成品脫膠原油的標準"},{"start":214,"end":218,"text":"所以在判斷有沒有超標的時候"},{"start":218,"end":220,"text":"看的是實用油脂"},{"start":220,"end":224,"text":"也就是它從中聯已經出批的"},{"start":224,"end":229,"text":"已經有批號的 出批的每一批的這些油脂"},{"start":229,"end":233,"text":"那麼在草裡面的 我們目前是沒有定標準"},{"start":233,"end":239,"text":"而是要透過你的製程去確保最終產品的符合標準"},{"start":239,"end":243,"text":"那麼從這個技術面還有相關的文獻來看"},{"start":243,"end":245,"text":"脫膠原油出來之後"},{"start":245,"end":250,"text":"後端它還要經過脫酸 脫色 脫臭"},{"start":250,"end":252,"text":"那麼在這個過程當中呢"},{"start":252,"end":261,"text":"它可以降低到80%的BAP扁平比的濃度的下降"},{"start":261,"end":265,"text":"所以我們不會去定在脫膠原油的濃度"},{"start":265,"end":268,"text":"而是定在後端 這個觀念是在這裡"},{"start":268,"end":270,"text":"所以看起來事實非常清楚"},{"start":270,"end":274,"text":"一個是發現異常後 立即拒收 完全沒有使用"},{"start":274,"end":280,"text":"另外一個事實上是 明知有問題仍然買回去繼續使用"},{"start":280,"end":285,"text":"想者的行為跟法律責任應該完全不同 不能夠混為異常"},{"start":285,"end":287,"text":"再來我們就回到核心"},{"start":287,"end":290,"text":"我不是想要護航台糖"},{"start":290,"end":294,"text":"而是要在這一檔說國營事業在幫忙蓋牌"},{"start":294,"end":297,"text":"完全就是混淆視聽 惡意毀謗"},{"start":297,"end":300,"text":"我想請大家回到台中地院的裁定書"},{"start":300,"end":302,"text":"裁定書之所以提到台糖"},{"start":302,"end":304,"text":"不是要證明台糖有問題"},{"start":304,"end":308,"text":"而是要證明中聯公司早就知道我們的油品異常"},{"start":308,"end":312,"text":"台糖已經把異常情況告訴中聯油"},{"start":312,"end":314,"text":"南角也曾經向中聯油反應"},{"start":314,"end":317,"text":"但中聯油始終都沒有依法通報"},{"start":317,"end":320,"text":"這才是整起事件真正的核心"},{"start":320,"end":322,"text":"中聯油不是不知道"},{"start":322,"end":324,"text":"而是明明知道有問題"},{"start":324,"end":328,"text":"卻選擇隱瞞 讓食安風險持續存在"},{"start":328,"end":330,"text":"所以回到這次修法"},{"start":330,"end":332,"text":"要讓責任通報更加明確"},{"start":332,"end":334,"text":"就今天不好好審法案"},{"start":334,"end":339,"text":"反而用扣帽子 栽贓的專案報告來進行政治操作"},{"start":339,"end":341,"text":"我真的覺得非常的遺憾"},{"start":341,"end":343,"text":"因為很多動員要補的話"},{"start":343,"end":345,"text":"一定要好好坐下來 好好的談"},{"start":345,"end":347,"text":"所以如果真的要追究責任"},{"start":347,"end":349,"text":"就應該追究中聯油本身"},{"start":349,"end":352,"text":"以及工廠所在地的地方主管機關"},{"start":352,"end":354,"text":"那個叫台中市政府"},{"start":354,"end":355,"text":"所以我想問部長"},{"start":355,"end":357,"text":"這次你們提出來草案"},{"start":357,"end":359,"text":"是否會建立更完善的通報責任"},{"start":359,"end":362,"text":"是不是說明一下這次修法的重點"},{"start":362,"end":364,"text":"我也要再次強調"},{"start":364,"end":366,"text":"蓋牌的是中聯"},{"start":366,"end":368,"text":"中聯呢 他蓋牌"},{"start":368,"end":370,"text":"南橋 他蓋牌"},{"start":370,"end":374,"text":"他沒有依照我們食安法的規定"},{"start":374,"end":378,"text":"在發現這個產品有危害健康之虞的時候"},{"start":378,"end":380,"text":"就通報主管機關"},{"start":380,"end":382,"text":"所以蓋牌的是中聯"},{"start":382,"end":384,"text":"是泰山 是南橋"},{"start":384,"end":386,"text":"是扶帽 是扶手"},{"start":386,"end":390,"text":"所以我們這一次在這個修法裡面會加重"},{"start":390,"end":392,"text":"沒有依法通報者"},{"start":392,"end":396,"text":"那麼我們把原本3萬到300萬會提高到3000萬"},{"start":396,"end":398,"text":"來加重這個"},{"start":398,"end":403,"text":"這個為隱匿或者是為按時通報"},{"start":403,"end":405,"text":"那麼他的這個處分"},{"start":405,"end":408,"text":"那麼其他的這個通報的責任"},{"start":408,"end":410,"text":"我們也會再擴大"},{"start":410,"end":412,"text":"包含檢驗的實驗室"},{"start":412,"end":416,"text":"過去在食安法第七條是針對食品業者通報的責任"},{"start":416,"end":418,"text":"那從這一個事件裡面我們發現"},{"start":418,"end":421,"text":"其實檢驗端他也已經發現有異常了"},{"start":421,"end":423,"text":"所以我們這一次修法"},{"start":423,"end":427,"text":"也把通報的義務擴及到檢驗端"},{"start":427,"end":429,"text":"也就是在這個檢驗室的部分"},{"start":429,"end":431,"text":"也要依法來通報"},{"start":431,"end":435,"text":"所以我覺得這個非常重要啦"},{"start":435,"end":437,"text":"因為台中市政府"},{"start":437,"end":441,"text":"身為中聯公司的縣市主管機關"},{"start":441,"end":444,"text":"我們本來第二條就有很明確的"},{"start":444,"end":446,"text":"中央有中央主管機關"},{"start":446,"end":449,"text":"地方有地方的主管機關"},{"start":449,"end":453,"text":"那盧市長卻一再推脫甩鍋時鐘說"},{"start":453,"end":454,"text":"不清楚自己的責任"},{"start":454,"end":459,"text":"現在一看到台糖就好像撿到槍"},{"start":459,"end":461,"text":"甚至看到仇人一樣"},{"start":461,"end":464,"text":"大肆批評攻擊卻好像忘了"},{"start":464,"end":466,"text":"自己所在地事實上是台中市"},{"start":466,"end":471,"text":"才是這起事件最應該負起查查責任的地方"},{"start":471,"end":472,"text":"依照食安法"},{"start":472,"end":473,"text":"依照食安法"},{"start":473,"end":478,"text":"台中市政府本來就負有地方查查跟抽驗的責任"},{"start":478,"end":480,"text":"所以問題的根本"},{"start":480,"end":483,"text":"第一個除了中聯郵通報以外"},{"start":483,"end":484,"text":"第二個問題就是"},{"start":484,"end":487,"text":"我們的台中市政府盧市長"},{"start":487,"end":489,"text":"部長事發至今"},{"start":489,"end":493,"text":"我想基本的行政調查跟事實你應該也掌握"},{"start":493,"end":495,"text":"如果從2024年至今"},{"start":495,"end":501,"text":"台中市政府有針對中聯郵的本篇筆抽驗一次"},{"start":501,"end":502,"text":"一次就好"},{"start":502,"end":504,"text":"是不是早就發現中聯郵有問題了"},{"start":504,"end":506,"text":"可是他們根本沒有驗過"},{"start":506,"end":507,"text":"沒有錯吧"},{"start":507,"end":508,"text":"他們驗了幾次"},{"start":508,"end":511,"text":"有一次是在我們113年"},{"start":511,"end":516,"text":"由食藥署啟動的專案稽查的部分"},{"start":516,"end":519,"text":"要求要抽驗本篇筆那一次"},{"start":519,"end":524,"text":"是所以市政府才是最需要要負起責任"},{"start":524,"end":525,"text":"所以會希望說"},{"start":525,"end":529,"text":"未來在法的時候要把各自的責任都已經講清楚"},{"start":529,"end":531,"text":"我覺得修了法"},{"start":531,"end":533,"text":"如果又不能落實只會甩鍋"},{"start":533,"end":536,"text":"那基本上沒有辦法讓我們的食安更安全"},{"start":536,"end":537,"text":"以上謝謝"},{"start":537,"end":538,"text":"謝謝"},{"start":538,"end":540,"text":"謝謝聯業群照的質詢"},{"start":540,"end":542,"text":"接下來請陳金輝委員"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}