{"error":false,"id":["170881"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":170881,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/170881","日期":"2026-08-10","影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2026-08-10T10:48:02+08:00","結束時間":"2026-08-10T10:57:57+08:00","影片長度":"00:09:55","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/11f3ac9a4aee4d25b965d278ac77f467a668c17b04757bc199ee4bfa2bac52e00829630984fb1b6e5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"伍麗華Saidhai Tahovecahe","委員發言時間":"10:48:02 - 10:57:57","會議時間":"2026-08-10T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"立法院第11屆修憲委員會公聽會(第2場)（事由：討論題綱：憲法增修條文第四條第一項第二款修正案一、山地原住民、平地原住民分類是否仍具有憲法上的正當性？二、取消山地、平地分類，原住民六席在憲法中的代表原則？三、山地、平地原住民分類退出憲法後，整體法制應如何銜接？四、修憲條文之文字應如何表述？）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":4.48596875,"end":122.57721875000001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":123.16784375,"end":243.50346875000002},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":244.04346875000002,"end":301.11471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":301.43534375,"end":320.50409375000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":321.48284375000003,"end":346.42409375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":346.91346875000005,"end":351.62159375000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":352.41471875,"end":378.68909375000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":379.22909375,"end":383.78534375000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":384.29159375,"end":438.52784375000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":439.27034375000005,"end":440.41784375000003},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":440.65409375,"end":443.15159375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":443.64096875,"end":445.56471875000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":445.78409375,"end":449.61471875},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":450.49221875,"end":454.17096875000004},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":455.47034375000004,"end":467.56971875000005},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":468.54846875000004,"end":477.55971875000006},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":477.69471875000005,"end":477.74534375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":477.94784375,"end":587.6184687500001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":588.09096875,"end":589.66034375},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":589.8628437500001,"end":592.3603437500001},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","start":593.45721875,"end":594.97596875}],"whisperx":[{"start":0,"end":7,"text":"謝謝主席、中嘉賓委員"},{"start":7,"end":11,"text":"特別把這一次的修憲委員會公聽會"},{"start":11,"end":15,"text":"排了一場屬於原住民議題的公聽會"},{"start":15,"end":17,"text":"我要再次表達感謝"},{"start":17,"end":21,"text":"其實我在上一屆也有提出同樣的版本"},{"start":21,"end":23,"text":"但是沒有過"},{"start":23,"end":26,"text":"這一次捲土重來"},{"start":26,"end":27,"text":"我想要表達一個立場"},{"start":27,"end":29,"text":"為什麼要這樣捲土重來"},{"start":29,"end":33,"text":"因為我覺得面對不公、不義、不對的事情"},{"start":33,"end":35,"text":"我們只有一種態度"},{"start":35,"end":36,"text":"不屈服"},{"start":36,"end":41,"text":"如果我們過去的前輩沒有秉持著這樣的態度"},{"start":41,"end":45,"text":"我們今天不可能看見原住民三個字"},{"start":45,"end":47,"text":"所以我覺得不對的事情"},{"start":47,"end":49,"text":"我們就要把它隔除"},{"start":49,"end":51,"text":"那我第二個立場就是"},{"start":51,"end":53,"text":"我其實是小卒"},{"start":53,"end":55,"text":"也許是不利的"},{"start":55,"end":58,"text":"但是我覺得要回歸到一件事"},{"start":58,"end":60,"text":"人就是人"},{"start":60,"end":62,"text":"原住民就是原住民"},{"start":62,"end":64,"text":"我先是原住民"},{"start":64,"end":66,"text":"才是中華民國的國民"},{"start":66,"end":68,"text":"所以在這個地方"},{"start":68,"end":71,"text":"關於那些政黨在想的"},{"start":71,"end":73,"text":"政治人物在想的"},{"start":73,"end":76,"text":"其實我自己也身為一個政治人物"},{"start":76,"end":79,"text":"我自己也有一個所屬的政黨"},{"start":79,"end":82,"text":"但是我們不應該停留在這裡"},{"start":82,"end":84,"text":"我們應該要往前走"},{"start":84,"end":85,"text":"所以今天來到這邊"},{"start":85,"end":88,"text":"我看到我們的提綱有三個"},{"start":88,"end":90,"text":"我就是要來做回應"},{"start":90,"end":91,"text":"第一個"},{"start":91,"end":93,"text":"山地原住民、平地原住民的分類"},{"start":93,"end":96,"text":"是否仍具有憲法上的正當性"},{"start":96,"end":97,"text":"第二個"},{"start":97,"end":99,"text":"取消了山地平地的分類"},{"start":99,"end":103,"text":"原住民六席在憲法中的代表原則"},{"start":103,"end":104,"text":"第三個"},{"start":104,"end":105,"text":"要回應的是"},{"start":105,"end":109,"text":"山地平地原住民分類退出憲法之後"},{"start":109,"end":112,"text":"整體的法治要如何去做銜接"},{"start":113,"end":115,"text":"所以回到第一個問題"},{"start":115,"end":118,"text":"我想剛才很多委員也有提到"},{"start":118,"end":122,"text":"在我們的第四條有兩款"},{"start":122,"end":126,"text":"那這第四條整個在講的是什麼呢"},{"start":126,"end":130,"text":"他提到的就是2005年第七次修憲之後"},{"start":130,"end":133,"text":"人數把它減半"},{"start":133,"end":135,"text":"任期四年"},{"start":135,"end":139,"text":"那另外就是有提到保障各區域的"},{"start":139,"end":141,"text":"一個代表性"},{"start":141,"end":145,"text":"還有保障小黨的一個多元價值"},{"start":145,"end":150,"text":"甚至是包括女性的保障實質政治參與"},{"start":150,"end":152,"text":"都有被寫進去"},{"start":152,"end":154,"text":"那在原住民的部分呢"},{"start":154,"end":156,"text":"寫到的是自由地區"},{"start":156,"end":159,"text":"平地原住民及山地原住民各三人"},{"start":159,"end":162,"text":"所以我們從這個第四條"},{"start":162,"end":165,"text":"我們就可以確立憲法的意旨"},{"start":165,"end":167,"text":"它真正要保障的是"},{"start":167,"end":170,"text":"原住民族的實質政治參與"},{"start":170,"end":173,"text":"而不是分類的本身"},{"start":173,"end":176,"text":"我想這個第一個部分我們要先了解"},{"start":176,"end":179,"text":"那再來我想要提到的就是"},{"start":179,"end":184,"text":"我們憲法徵修條文第四條第一款第二項"},{"start":184,"end":187,"text":"為什麼會區分出自由地區"},{"start":187,"end":190,"text":"平地原住民及山地原住民"},{"start":190,"end":193,"text":"剛才很多學者前輩呢"},{"start":193,"end":194,"text":"也都有提到了"},{"start":194,"end":199,"text":"因為他的嚴格就是延續日治時代的戶口調查"},{"start":199,"end":203,"text":"我們可以看到它是人地區分"},{"start":203,"end":206,"text":"因為當時把全國的原住民"},{"start":206,"end":211,"text":"把他的地分為普通行政區跟山地行政區"},{"start":211,"end":215,"text":"又把我們的人去做這樣的一個分類"},{"start":215,"end":217,"text":"所以延續到戰後"},{"start":217,"end":219,"text":"我們的國民政府"},{"start":219,"end":223,"text":"也就是繼續做這種人地區分"},{"start":223,"end":226,"text":"把人呢就變成山包平包"},{"start":226,"end":230,"text":"把地呢分山地行政區平地行政區"},{"start":230,"end":233,"text":"但是我們要回過頭來看一下"},{"start":233,"end":236,"text":"在憲法上有它的正當性嗎"},{"start":236,"end":238,"text":"剛才也有很多學者前輩提到"},{"start":238,"end":240,"text":"同一個民族"},{"start":240,"end":244,"text":"阿美族也有山原平原"},{"start":244,"end":247,"text":"排灣族也有分山原平原"},{"start":247,"end":250,"text":"泰雅族也有分山原平原"},{"start":250,"end":253,"text":"其實幾乎每一個族多多少少"},{"start":253,"end":259,"text":"都會有這樣的一個不同的屬於山原或平原"},{"start":259,"end":262,"text":"另外同一個部落也造成困擾"},{"start":262,"end":265,"text":"以台東的達魯馬克部落來講"},{"start":265,"end":268,"text":"同一個部落我們同樣都是盧凱族"},{"start":268,"end":271,"text":"但是我們有的是投山原"},{"start":271,"end":273,"text":"有的是投平原"},{"start":273,"end":275,"text":"甚至同一個家族也很困擾"},{"start":275,"end":277,"text":"我爸爸是阿美族"},{"start":277,"end":278,"text":"媽媽是排灣族"},{"start":278,"end":281,"text":"但是我爸爸參選的時候"},{"start":281,"end":283,"text":"我可能登記的是排灣族"},{"start":283,"end":285,"text":"我不能投給我爸爸"},{"start":285,"end":290,"text":"所以這個都是一種政治服務的一個目的"},{"start":290,"end":293,"text":"卻沒有任何的實質意義"},{"start":293,"end":295,"text":"這是非常荒謬的"},{"start":295,"end":297,"text":"所以我們要來看一下"},{"start":297,"end":301,"text":"我們梳理一下當時修憲的一個脈絡"},{"start":301,"end":306,"text":"因為在1994年的第三次修憲"},{"start":306,"end":308,"text":"剛才有提到"},{"start":308,"end":311,"text":"因為在場的有我們的拉法高牧師"},{"start":311,"end":315,"text":"也有賴坤臣國大"},{"start":315,"end":318,"text":"應該你們兩位當時都在"},{"start":318,"end":321,"text":"蔡中寒國大也在嗎"},{"start":321,"end":325,"text":"所以這個部分大家應該很清楚"},{"start":325,"end":328,"text":"當時的原住民權益團體"},{"start":328,"end":332,"text":"他們要求的版本其實是原住民族"},{"start":332,"end":335,"text":"台灣原住民族"},{"start":335,"end":336,"text":"但是很遺憾"},{"start":336,"end":340,"text":"最後還是沿用這種殖民的移去"},{"start":340,"end":342,"text":"政治目的的一個分類"},{"start":342,"end":344,"text":"但是我想請大家看一段話"},{"start":344,"end":346,"text":"是公報裡面記錄的"},{"start":346,"end":348,"text":"是什麼呢"},{"start":348,"end":352,"text":"就是當時的國大曹啟宏他說"},{"start":352,"end":355,"text":"我們堅持原住民就是原住民"},{"start":355,"end":358,"text":"台灣的原住民族就是台灣的原住民族"},{"start":358,"end":363,"text":"因而反對在江之分化成所謂的山地原住民"},{"start":363,"end":365,"text":"和平地原住民"},{"start":365,"end":368,"text":"李登輝在接見各族代表時"},{"start":368,"end":371,"text":"曾經當場親口答應"},{"start":371,"end":373,"text":"不會再做此種區分"},{"start":373,"end":376,"text":"但是國民黨的黨政修憲案"},{"start":376,"end":379,"text":"對此卻仍不放鬆"},{"start":379,"end":384,"text":"我要談的是其實我們在1994年的修憲"},{"start":384,"end":387,"text":"就可以完成這件事"},{"start":387,"end":389,"text":"為什麼到了今天"},{"start":389,"end":392,"text":"32年後的今天"},{"start":392,"end":398,"text":"我們卻仍然說出沒有辦法與時俱進的一個話"},{"start":398,"end":401,"text":"我覺得這個令人非常非常的遺憾"},{"start":401,"end":403,"text":"所以呢在這個地方"},{"start":403,"end":406,"text":"我要第二個要去回應的就是"},{"start":406,"end":408,"text":"取消山地平地的分類"},{"start":408,"end":412,"text":"那麼原住民六席在憲法中的代表原則"},{"start":412,"end":415,"text":"我想這個部分已經有很多的學者"},{"start":415,"end":418,"text":"在過去原民會也都委託研究"},{"start":418,"end":421,"text":"包括剛才關大偉教授他說"},{"start":421,"end":425,"text":"他跟林士淵教授鄭素芬教授做過研究報告"},{"start":425,"end":429,"text":"甚至包正航教授高德毅教授"},{"start":429,"end":432,"text":"也都做過這樣的一個選區劃分"},{"start":432,"end":436,"text":"我想說的是2005年的修憲"},{"start":436,"end":439,"text":"大家都改為單一選區"},{"start":439,"end":443,"text":"為什麼把原住民落在這個地方"},{"start":443,"end":450,"text":"讓原住民的立法委員承受全國選區"},{"start":450,"end":455,"text":"我真的不理解我們的族人何其無辜"},{"start":455,"end":459,"text":"要由這麼少的立法委員去服務全國"},{"start":459,"end":463,"text":"他哪一天才能夠接受到服務"},{"start":463,"end":468,"text":"他哪一天才能夠看到立法委員到他的家幫助他"},{"start":468,"end":471,"text":"我真的覺得這是不對的"},{"start":471,"end":474,"text":"所以我覺得撇除掉這些政治的考慮"},{"start":474,"end":477,"text":"我覺得原住民就是原住民"},{"start":477,"end":480,"text":"至於怎麼樣去做選區劃分"},{"start":480,"end":483,"text":"這些都是技術上可以做得到的"},{"start":483,"end":486,"text":"而且非常的回應呼應"},{"start":486,"end":492,"text":"當前已經超過50%的原住民移住到我們的都會地區"},{"start":492,"end":496,"text":"所以我覺得這個時候我們應該要努力做的是"},{"start":496,"end":499,"text":"修憲很難幾乎不可能"},{"start":499,"end":502,"text":"但是我們如何口徑一致"},{"start":502,"end":505,"text":"讓大家知道原住民就是原住民"},{"start":505,"end":508,"text":"所以我覺得這個基本立場"},{"start":508,"end":511,"text":"我覺得是我們必須應該要守住的"},{"start":511,"end":514,"text":"最後一個就是我們希望說"},{"start":514,"end":517,"text":"關於山地平地原住民的分類"},{"start":517,"end":521,"text":"退出中華民國的憲法之後"},{"start":521,"end":523,"text":"整體的法制應如何銜接"},{"start":523,"end":528,"text":"剛才有提到其實退出憲法是一件事"},{"start":528,"end":532,"text":"未來其實我們還有很多的涉及到的法律"},{"start":532,"end":538,"text":"包括原住民身份法原民會組織法地方制度法公職人員選罷法等等"},{"start":538,"end":540,"text":"非常多部的法律"},{"start":540,"end":544,"text":"但是我覺得第一部先把這樣的一個分類"},{"start":544,"end":547,"text":"退出民主憲政的一個國家"},{"start":547,"end":549,"text":"這樣的一個不當的措辭"},{"start":549,"end":552,"text":"第二個在法律的層次"},{"start":552,"end":556,"text":"我們希望能夠去設計具體的制度"},{"start":556,"end":560,"text":"其實學者專家要來做這件事情確實不難"},{"start":560,"end":563,"text":"第三個就是過渡時期的保障"},{"start":563,"end":569,"text":"要確保能夠讓原住民族的權力能夠平順的銜接"},{"start":569,"end":571,"text":"在這邊因為時間的關係"},{"start":571,"end":577,"text":"所以我還是要再一次的來呼籲原住民就是原住民"},{"start":577,"end":582,"text":"如果過去幾十年沒有這些原權前輩的堅持"},{"start":582,"end":586,"text":"我們今天也沒有辦法得到原住民三個字"},{"start":586,"end":589,"text":"所以證明尚未成功"},{"start":589,"end":591,"text":"我希望大家繼續努力"},{"start":591,"end":592,"text":"謝謝"},{"start":592,"end":594,"text":"好 謝謝吳立華委員"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}