{"error":false,"id":["171024"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":171024,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/171024","日期":"2026-08-19","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"委員會-11-5-36-29","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第5會期司法及法制委員會第29次全體委員會議","屆":11,"會期":5,"會次":29,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"委員會","委員會代碼":[36],"委員會代碼:str":["司法及法制委員會"],"標題":"第11屆第5會期司法及法制委員會第29次全體委員會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2026-08-19T09:11:33+08:00","結束時間":"2026-08-19T09:15:42+08:00","影片長度":"00:04:09","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/0db75461a96d9b8083f0161ce0712f3c2b450a12875ec880271709ee836f68b762af07d6823bbab05ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"吳宗憲","委員發言時間":"09:11:33 - 09:15:42","會議時間":"2026-08-19T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"立法院第11屆第5會期司法及法制委員會第29次全體委員會議（事由：一、審查委員賴惠員等17人擬具「刑事訴訟法部分條文修正草案」案。\n二、審查委員洪孟楷等26人擬具「刑事訴訟法部分條文修正草案」案。\n三、審查委員王世堅等16人擬具「刑事訴訟法增訂部分條文草案」案。\n四、審查委員翁曉玲等21人擬具「刑事訴訟法第四百五十五條之四十六條文修正草案」案。\n五、審查委員吳宗憲等18人擬具「刑事訴訟法部分條文修正草案」案。\n六、審查委員翁曉玲等18人擬具「刑事訴訟法部分條文修正草案」案。\n七、審查委員翁曉玲等18人擬具「刑事訴訟法第三百十條條文修正草案」案。\n【第六案如經院會復議，則不予審查】\n【本次會議僅進行詢答】）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"吳委員宗憲","start":0.03096875,"end":0.52034375,"speaker_score":0.948},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"吳委員宗憲","start":5.7009687499999995,"end":44.42909375,"speaker_score":0.948},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"吳委員宗憲","start":44.71596875,"end":48.462218750000005,"speaker_score":0.948},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"吳委員宗憲","start":48.64784375,"end":101.61846875,"speaker_score":0.948},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"吳委員宗憲","start":101.92221875000001,"end":119.67471875000001,"speaker_score":0.948},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"吳委員宗憲","start":119.92784375000001,"end":121.46346875,"speaker_score":0.948},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"吳委員宗憲","start":121.90221875,"end":150.15096875,"speaker_score":0.948},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"吳委員宗憲","start":151.21409375000002,"end":192.38909375,"speaker_score":0.948},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"吳委員宗憲","start":193.04721875,"end":230.02034375000002,"speaker_score":0.948},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"吳委員宗憲","start":230.32409375,"end":249.29159375,"speaker_score":0.948},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"吳委員宗憲","start":249.37596875000003,"end":250.69221875000002,"speaker_score":0.948}],"whisperx":[{"start":0,"end":0.5,"text":"郭榮鏗"},{"start":5.72,"end":6.72,"text":"謝謝主席"},{"start":7.12,"end":10.120000000000001,"text":"我這一次的草案總共五個重點"},{"start":10.120000000000001,"end":11.64,"text":"包括被害人權益"},{"start":11.96,"end":15.16,"text":"書記官資源還有放寬免檢送條件"},{"start":15.56,"end":18.96,"text":"被害人聲音不能繼續在司法裡面消失"},{"start":19.240000000000002,"end":23,"text":"還有書記官不應該繼續用健康來換案件的結案"},{"start":23.36,"end":25.04,"text":"我想我這次是這五個重點"},{"start":25.52,"end":27.16,"text":"那但我今天提案說明"},{"start":27.2,"end":30.4,"text":"我要把其中的兩個重要的再重新再論述一次"},{"start":30.88,"end":35.6,"text":"今年三月貪污被告中油公司的前執行長徐漢"},{"start":35.88,"end":37.76,"text":"他本來被裁定電子腳聊"},{"start":38,"end":40.76,"text":"結果在宣判的前四天他用殺輪機"},{"start":41.08,"end":42.88,"text":"一分鐘就切斷電子腳聊"},{"start":43.16,"end":44.400000000000006,"text":"帶著現金就跑掉"},{"start":44.84,"end":47.519999999999996,"text":"那監控中心他得到警報之後再趕過去"},{"start":47.519999999999996,"end":48.44,"text":"現場只剩下"},{"start":48.84,"end":51.32,"text":"切斷了電子腳聊人早就不見了"},{"start":51.64,"end":53.32,"text":"所以這個案子暴露了一個"},{"start":53.68,"end":56.120000000000005,"text":"漏洞就是電子腳聊他不是萬靈丹"},{"start":56.48,"end":60.04,"text":"設備斷了人失聯了第一線警力能做什麼"},{"start":60.48,"end":65.24,"text":"依照現行法的規定他只能等法院重新裁定才能再抓人"},{"start":65.6,"end":67.88,"text":"那這個等待時間就是被告逃亡的時間"},{"start":68.24,"end":70.96,"text":"所以從去年的中文治安到今年的徐漢"},{"start":70.96,"end":72.4,"text":"我們證明了一件事情"},{"start":72.72,"end":75.44,"text":"我們防逃的制度即使反應能力太差"},{"start":75.75999999999999,"end":77.75999999999999,"text":"所以我的草案這次明定說"},{"start":77.96,"end":80.96,"text":"只要被告違反規定情況急迫的時候"},{"start":81.2,"end":84.75999999999999,"text":"警察可以先抓人事後再跟檢察官請票"},{"start":85.16000000000001,"end":88.44000000000001,"text":"那第二個我想要論述的重點是判決書的簡化"},{"start":89.08000000000001,"end":91.32000000000001,"text":"那有人評論說如果判決書簡化"},{"start":91.84,"end":92.84,"text":"法官少寫"},{"start":93.16000000000001,"end":95.68,"text":"一些字會不會違背了法官說禮物"},{"start":96.08000000000001,"end":99.44,"text":"我想我自己當過檢察官我很清楚司法現場"},{"start":99.68,"end":100.96000000000001,"text":"現在是什麼的樣子"},{"start":102,"end":105.64,"text":"讓司法官心力交瘁的事情是什麼"},{"start":105.96000000000001,"end":107.08000000000001,"text":"我來跟各位報告"},{"start":107.48,"end":111.96000000000001,"text":"司法院4月的新聞稿提到114年地方法院總受理見訴"},{"start":112.2,"end":113.68,"text":"相較110年"},{"start":113.92,"end":116.36000000000001,"text":"增加了18萬8千多件"},{"start":116.72000000000001,"end":117.92,"text":"漲幅將近四成"},{"start":118.36000000000001,"end":121.32000000000001,"text":"這個漲幅比房價漲的還誇張"},{"start":121.92,"end":125.44000000000001,"text":"司法院書面報告也提到現在的地院的刑庭"},{"start":125.76,"end":128.92000000000002,"text":"每個月每個法官平均新收案件數"},{"start":129.20000000000002,"end":131.4,"text":"從52件攀升到68件"},{"start":131.68,"end":133.16,"text":"增加超過三成"},{"start":133.76000000000002,"end":136.48000000000002,"text":"那法官人數呢增加卻不到3%"},{"start":137,"end":139.44,"text":"那案件量漲了將近40%"},{"start":139.52,"end":141.04000000000002,"text":"但是法官多不到3%"},{"start":141.36,"end":143.60000000000002,"text":"那這個缺口是靠法官書記官"},{"start":143.88,"end":147.48000000000002,"text":"他們賣肝長期用自己的健康在那邊打拼的"},{"start":147.72,"end":150.04000000000002,"text":"那我們我們很多時候我很清楚"},{"start":151.32,"end":154.64000000000001,"text":"司法官最心力交瘁的常常是書類的製作"},{"start":154.64000000000001,"end":155.92000000000002,"text":"他不是開庭不是"},{"start":156.16,"end":159.76000000000002,"text":"不是帶隊搜索不是熬夜他常常都是書類的製作"},{"start":160,"end":162.56,"text":"所以我規劃什麼樣的案子可以用簡化"},{"start":162.8,"end":164.36,"text":"第一個被告已經認罪"},{"start":164.60000000000002,"end":166.60000000000002,"text":"或是事實沒有爭議"},{"start":166.60000000000002,"end":167.68,"text":"第二個字沒有爭議"},{"start":167.92000000000002,"end":170.24,"text":"或雙方對起訴內容不爭執的案件"},{"start":170.48000000000002,"end":173.84,"text":"像這種法官法院本來就不需要花大量的"},{"start":174.16,"end":175.20000000000002,"text":"篇幅去記載"},{"start":175.56,"end":178.04000000000002,"text":"事實是怎麼認定這個證據為什麼採"},{"start":178.20000000000002,"end":179.48000000000002,"text":"那個證據為什麼不採"},{"start":179.72,"end":181.52,"text":"所以這個部分我們要把它簡化"},{"start":182.04000000000002,"end":186.76000000000002,"text":"那因為這些沒有爭點卻要求一份完整的判決書格式"},{"start":187,"end":189.76000000000002,"text":"其實這個沒有必要而且是把法官的時間"},{"start":190,"end":192.28,"text":"鎖在這個沒有爭議的文書上面"},{"start":193.08,"end":196.28,"text":"那當然我的法我的草案也同時設了一道防線就是"},{"start":196.56,"end":198.88,"text":"案件如果是5年以上的重罪"},{"start":199.2,"end":200.35999999999999,"text":"但是最後法官呢"},{"start":200.6,"end":203.76,"text":"找了一堆簡型的條件把它檢到判刑兩年以下"},{"start":204,"end":206.07999999999998,"text":"那這個時候不能用簡化"},{"start":206.32,"end":207.35999999999999,"text":"的方式因為"},{"start":207.6,"end":210.72,"text":"法官必須對這一類的案子去說理清楚"},{"start":210.96,"end":212.51999999999998,"text":"這個是社會需要看到"},{"start":213.51999999999998,"end":215.04,"text":"部分好那最後強調"},{"start":215.28,"end":218.12,"text":"司法過勞的這件事情已經很嚴重了"},{"start":218.4,"end":220.8,"text":"那最後的影響不是這些司法官"},{"start":221.04,"end":223.92,"text":"最後受害者會是全國人民的身上"},{"start":224.16,"end":226.72,"text":"司法人力長期的超載"},{"start":227,"end":227.76,"text":"富貨不良"},{"start":228.07999999999998,"end":229.84,"text":"其實這個消耗過量的"},{"start":230.35999999999999,"end":233.79999999999998,"text":"經歷在文書作業上面那真正複雜有爭議"},{"start":234.04,"end":236.28,"text":"他必須攸關人民自由生命"},{"start":236.51999999999998,"end":237.79999999999998,"text":"財產的重大案件"},{"start":238.07999999999998,"end":240.23999999999998,"text":"得不到有應有的審理資源"},{"start":240.51999999999998,"end":244.39999999999998,"text":"那嚴當就會讓每一個在等待司法給出答案的人"},{"start":244.64,"end":249.12,"text":"永遠等不到所以這是我這次修法想要解決的一個重大問題"},{"start":249.35999999999999,"end":250.64,"text":"好謝謝主席謝謝各位"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}