{"error":false,"id":["171160"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":171160,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/171160","日期":"2026-08-26","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"聯席會議-11-5-26,36-2","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第5會期社會福利及衛生環境、司法及法制委員會第2次聯席會議","屆":11,"會期":5,"會次":2,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"聯席會議","委員會代碼":[26,36],"委員會代碼:str":["社會福利及衛生環境委員會","司法及法制委員會"],"標題":"第11屆第5會期社會福利及衛生環境、司法及法制委員會第2次聯席會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2026-08-26T11:12:01+08:00","結束時間":"2026-08-26T11:20:22+08:00","影片長度":"00:08:21","支援功能":["ai-transcript","gazette"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/2075dd897ebcbff84b4d0ae2279dd247c43ef1b78780053ee5ea6027204f1d9bd104b08215f3295d5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"盧縣一","委員發言時間":"11:12:01 - 11:20:22","會議時間":"2026-08-26T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"立法院第11屆第5會期社會福利及衛生環境、司法及法制委員會第2次聯席會議（事由：一、審查「性侵害犯罪防治法部分條文修正草案」等10案。\n(一)委員葉元之等19人擬具「性侵害犯罪防治法第五十二條條文修正草案」案。\n(二)委員黃健豪等23人擬具「性侵害犯罪防治法部分條文修正草案」案。\n(三)委員徐巧芯等16人擬具「性侵害犯罪防治法增訂第三十二條之一條文草案」案。\n(四)委員鄭正鈐等22人擬具「性侵害犯罪防治法增訂第二十八條之一條文草案」案。\n(五)委員吳沛憶等17人擬具「性侵害犯罪防治法增訂第十條之一條文草案」案。\n(六)委員魯明哲等18人擬具「性侵害犯罪防治法增訂第十一條之一條文草案」案。\n(七)委員魯明哲等18人擬具「性侵害犯罪防治法第二十九條條文修正草案」案。\n(八)委員陳培瑜等16人擬具「性侵害犯罪防治法部分條文修正草案」案。\n(九)委員王育敏等20人擬具「性侵害犯罪防治法第二十九條及第四十三條之一條文修正草案」案。\n(十)委員張雅琳等16人擬具「性侵害犯罪防治法部分條文修正草案」案。\n二、審查「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例部分條文修正草案」等17案。\n(一)委員陳亭妃等17人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例部分條文修正草案」案。\n(二)委員徐欣瑩等27人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例第三十二條及第三十三條條文修正草案」案。\n(三)委員張智倫等18人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例部分條文修正草案」案。\n(四)委員廖先翔等17人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例第三十九條條文修正草案」案。\n(五)委員蔡其昌等17人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例增訂第五十三條之二條文草案」案。\n(六)委員黃秀芳等18人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例增訂第五十三條之二條文草案」案。\n(七)委員羅廷瑋等18人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例第十二條、第五十三條之二及第五十五條條文修正草案」案。\n(八)委員林宜瑾等19人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例增訂第五十三條之二條文草案」案。\n(九)委員林俊憲等18人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例增訂第五十三條之二條文草案」案。\n(十)委員邱議瑩等16人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例增訂第五十三條之二條文草案」案。\n(十一)委員林月琴等21人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例增訂第十三條之一及第五十三條之二條文草案」案。\n(十二)委員王育敏等19人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例第十二條、第五十三條之二及第五十五條條文修正草案」案。\n(十三)委員范雲等16人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例增訂第五十三條之二及第五十三條之三條文草案」案。\n(十四)委員陳培瑜等16人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例部分條文修正草案」案。\n(十五)委員翁曉玲等18人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例第十二條及第五十三條之二條文修正草案」案。\n......（完整內容，詳見議事日程）\n【本次會議綜合詢答，僅詢答】）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":5.0934687499999995,"end":6.8990937500000005,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":7.21971875,"end":8.063468750000002,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":11.809718750000002,"end":69.70784375000001,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":18.35721875,"end":18.69471875,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":22.086593750000002,"end":22.559093750000002,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":33.96659375,"end":34.74284375,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":37.189718750000004,"end":37.42596875,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":57.69284375,"end":57.861593750000004,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":57.89534375,"end":57.945968750000006,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":69.92721875000001,"end":82.46534375,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":73.36971875,"end":73.67346875,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":77.58846875,"end":77.74034375000001,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":82.66784375,"end":108.79034375,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":88.81034375,"end":89.55284375000001,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":92.20221875,"end":92.87721875000001,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":109.19534375,"end":118.98284375,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":120.28221875000001,"end":130.49159375000002,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":127.28534375000001,"end":127.89284375000001,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":130.71096875,"end":133.86659375000002,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":133.86659375000002,"end":140.48159375,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":140.59971875000002,"end":141.02159375000002,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":141.02159375000002,"end":147.94034375,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":144.80159375,"end":144.81846875000002,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":148.81784375,"end":190.66784375,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":158.67284375,"end":158.99346875,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":170.40096875,"end":171.09284375000001,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":174.24846875,"end":174.55221875,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":191.15721875,"end":205.24784375000002,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":205.28159375,"end":207.15471875,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":207.45846875,"end":207.64409375000002,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":207.64409375000002,"end":238.69409375,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":238.86284375000002,"end":241.47846875000002,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":241.90034375000002,"end":244.17846875,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":244.58346875,"end":247.55346875,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":248.00909375,"end":259.58534375,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":260.00721875,"end":336.97409375,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":263.44971875000005,"end":264.93471875,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":304.37159375000005,"end":304.75971875000005,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":319.45784375,"end":319.60971875,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":319.64346875,"end":320.01471875000004,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":329.24534375,"end":329.70096875,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":334.89846875,"end":335.13471875000005,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":337.29471875,"end":376.95096875,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":344.63534375,"end":344.65221875000003,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":377.33909375,"end":412.82721875000004,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":414.26159375000003,"end":423.66096875000005,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":415.89846875,"end":415.96596875,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":421.55159375000005,"end":421.70346875,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":424.15034375000005,"end":424.58909375,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":425.44971875000005,"end":425.75346875,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":427.39034375,"end":433.78596875000005,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":429.66846875000005,"end":430.71471875000003,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":431.57534375,"end":437.78534375000004,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":435.64221875000004,"end":435.96284375000005,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":437.92034375000003,"end":440.26596875,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":440.31659375000004,"end":470.91096875000005,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":451.42034375000003,"end":452.46659375,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":472.26096875,"end":489.01784375000005,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":489.23721875,"end":495.41346875000005,"speaker_score":0.937},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"呂次長建德","start":494.33346875,"end":498.31596875,"speaker_score":0.978},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_01","speaker_name":"盧委員縣一","start":498.14721875000004,"end":501.38721875000005,"speaker_score":0.937}],"whisperx":[{"start":0,"end":7,"text":"好 謝謝主席 有請呂次長"},{"start":7,"end":8,"text":"有請呂次"},{"start":8,"end":12,"text":"呂委員好"},{"start":12,"end":14,"text":"我們今天談了很多"},{"start":14,"end":16,"text":"不過我想說今天的修法本席"},{"start":16,"end":18,"text":"是希望能夠留下三件事情"},{"start":18,"end":20,"text":"第一就是司法設政"},{"start":20,"end":22,"text":"假日之間的資訊不能斷鏈"},{"start":22,"end":24,"text":"第二就是被害人的權利不能"},{"start":24,"end":27,"text":"因為他太晚沒有勇氣說出口"},{"start":27,"end":29,"text":"就被時效關在門外"},{"start":29,"end":32,"text":"第三個就是高風險的加害人的處遇"},{"start":32,"end":34,"text":"社區監督不能有空窗"},{"start":34,"end":37,"text":"而第一線也要有足夠的人力跟預算去執行"},{"start":37,"end":40,"text":"所以講到我們所謂的空窗"},{"start":40,"end":44,"text":"我們修這些法例就是看能不能真正的降低風險"},{"start":44,"end":47,"text":"所以今天討論的加害人登記報到查訪"},{"start":47,"end":51,"text":"身心治療輔導教育及高風險資訊的揭露"},{"start":51,"end":52,"text":"看起來像是不同的制度"},{"start":52,"end":55,"text":"但其實都是在處理同一件事情"},{"start":55,"end":57,"text":"就是社區的監督不能出現空窗"},{"start":57,"end":61,"text":"風險也不能再次發生傷害之後才能夠被看見"},{"start":61,"end":63,"text":"所以想知道說"},{"start":63,"end":69,"text":"市長的看見是說處理空窗大概發生在哪兩個類型"},{"start":69,"end":73,"text":"我們這個部分主要第一個就是剛剛所謂的保護性"},{"start":73,"end":79,"text":"另外一個就是說特別是對兒少這邊的一個領域"},{"start":79,"end":82,"text":"我想這個都是相關的比較容易出現的"},{"start":82,"end":85,"text":"那處理空窗我大概爬速了一下"},{"start":85,"end":87,"text":"大家知道是在一顆髮巾的部分"},{"start":87,"end":93,"text":"還有就是被移送偵辦的時候會出現的處理空窗"},{"start":93,"end":98,"text":"我想說現行的法例就規定尤其投行如果遵義義服社會勞動"},{"start":98,"end":104,"text":"不必等到行其執行完畢就可以遵義社會勞動的時候"},{"start":104,"end":108,"text":"就可以啟動身心治療跟輔導教育等評估處境"},{"start":108,"end":111,"text":"可是沒有入監執行的一顆髮巾"},{"start":111,"end":114,"text":"現行的條文並沒有相同的規定"},{"start":114,"end":118,"text":"所以一個人的我想說是不是這個一顆髮巾跟"},{"start":120,"end":125,"text":"這個與尚偵辦的時候是不是在他的起點處理起點"},{"start":125,"end":129,"text":"是不是應該要這樣的一個修法方向"},{"start":129,"end":134,"text":"有沒有同意這方面的支持這個修法方向"},{"start":134,"end":137,"text":"包委員我完全支持而且剛剛委員您所說的這些"},{"start":137,"end":141,"text":"我們基本上也已經送到行政院的版本裡面也已經納入"},{"start":141,"end":144,"text":"我們這個是非常就是這個你剛說工商期的部分"},{"start":144,"end":148,"text":"這個透過這個方式可以有效來來來米平"},{"start":148,"end":152,"text":"再來就是說我們現在講到加害人的資訊揭露"},{"start":152,"end":156,"text":"有委員的版本提出就是說已經採取分級的制度"},{"start":156,"end":158,"text":"就是不是所有的加害人一律關開"},{"start":158,"end":161,"text":"然後揭露的資訊也不是毫無限制"},{"start":161,"end":166,"text":"可是要討論是面對經專業評估認定一定有再犯風險的個案"},{"start":166,"end":170,"text":"我們不能我們能不能依照比例原則採取分級"},{"start":170,"end":174,"text":"分對象分區域分期間的一個必要通知"},{"start":174,"end":179,"text":"對就是說對於評估就有什麼級別以上的再犯風險"},{"start":179,"end":183,"text":"經常活動在學校幼兒園或托育機構的附近的一個個案"},{"start":183,"end":187,"text":"是否可以研議向特定學校機構一定的範圍內"},{"start":187,"end":190,"text":"做必要對象的通知是不是"},{"start":190,"end":194,"text":"是跟我們報告現在就是兩個問題"},{"start":194,"end":197,"text":"第一個就是說大家都非常關心就是性侵害案件"},{"start":197,"end":200,"text":"他的這個加害人要不要公開"},{"start":200,"end":204,"text":"那我們剛剛跟黃秀娃委員的討論裡面也說到就是說"},{"start":204,"end":207,"text":"因為很多加害人很多事實上都是熟人"},{"start":207,"end":211,"text":"所以這裡面會怕就是說對於被害人"},{"start":211,"end":215,"text":"他有沒有資訊因為這樣揭露之後被人家暗圖所計"},{"start":215,"end":217,"text":"然後甚至是有工程造成惡毒傷害"},{"start":217,"end":219,"text":"所以這個是真的必須要來謹慎為之"},{"start":219,"end":222,"text":"第一點第二點剛剛委員剛剛所說的就是說"},{"start":222,"end":224,"text":"有關於風險的這個分級"},{"start":224,"end":227,"text":"那這裡面其實我們現在目前現行的"},{"start":227,"end":230,"text":"性侵害防治法裡面其實就有部分公告"},{"start":230,"end":234,"text":"如果認為有罪犯還有罪犯之虞的話"},{"start":234,"end":237,"text":"我們的法院事實上就可以來有一個強制治療"},{"start":237,"end":240,"text":"跟社區隔離的一個"},{"start":240,"end":246,"text":"那如果說還有罪犯風險沒有按照他的規定來強制治療的話"},{"start":246,"end":249,"text":"而且甚至有逃亡逃亡藏匿之虞的話"},{"start":249,"end":251,"text":"我們警察機關在這種情況之下"},{"start":251,"end":253,"text":"就可以公告他的身份資訊"},{"start":253,"end":255,"text":"包括他的姓名照片跟所犯罪名"},{"start":255,"end":258,"text":"所以這裡面我們都有一個整個分級"},{"start":258,"end":260,"text":"相關的一個整個設計"},{"start":260,"end":263,"text":"好像昨天三個通過我們兒少家屬的那個"},{"start":263,"end":265,"text":"是是兒家屬"},{"start":265,"end":269,"text":"對那我想說現在第三條明文規定說"},{"start":269,"end":271,"text":"主管機關應該獨立編列預算"},{"start":271,"end":274,"text":"並設置專職人員辦理兒童及少年"},{"start":274,"end":276,"text":"性不需要防治業務"},{"start":276,"end":277,"text":"所以本席想請問說"},{"start":277,"end":281,"text":"會不是否掌握了全國22個縣市"},{"start":281,"end":284,"text":"各自編列多少兒少性剝削的防治預算"},{"start":284,"end":287,"text":"有沒有預計核定多少的專職人員"},{"start":287,"end":289,"text":"然後以後實際到指的多少"},{"start":289,"end":292,"text":"然後有多少名義上是專職人員"},{"start":292,"end":296,"text":"可是實際上他還是兼辦家暴兒保性侵害其他社政的案件"},{"start":296,"end":299,"text":"所以我想知道說目前每名人員"},{"start":299,"end":301,"text":"平均負擔多少案件"},{"start":301,"end":304,"text":"所以我想說有一個具體的訴求"},{"start":304,"end":306,"text":"市長希望政府不能夠在一個月內"},{"start":306,"end":309,"text":"向本委員會提出22縣市的盤點報告"},{"start":309,"end":312,"text":"最少應該要包括這些兒少性剝削的獨立預算"},{"start":312,"end":315,"text":"中央補助與地方自籌的經費"},{"start":315,"end":319,"text":"核電及實際到指的專職人力缺額跟兼辦的情形"},{"start":319,"end":325,"text":"平均按量及本次修法新增業務所需要的人力跟經費評估"},{"start":325,"end":329,"text":"所以我想說不要再用全國保護性社工整人數來回答"},{"start":329,"end":332,"text":"我想說從第三條第一項所要求的"},{"start":332,"end":334,"text":"兒少性剝削防治的專職讓能"},{"start":334,"end":337,"text":"會不會來怎麼來落實"},{"start":337,"end":338,"text":"非常感謝委員的關心"},{"start":338,"end":341,"text":"完全支持委員也非常感謝委員對於我們這個"},{"start":341,"end":343,"text":"保護性社工的一個支持"},{"start":343,"end":344,"text":"那我跟委員報告"},{"start":344,"end":347,"text":"牽涉到有關於地方政府這邊有關於這個"},{"start":347,"end":348,"text":"有關於性剝削的部分"},{"start":348,"end":350,"text":"如果沒有記錯大概56位"},{"start":350,"end":352,"text":"詳細的數字我再跟您回報"},{"start":352,"end":355,"text":"那可是這裡面其實我們都發"},{"start":355,"end":357,"text":"我們也知道就是他的case loading"},{"start":357,"end":360,"text":"就是說他的每案的負擔量其實真的是蠻大"},{"start":360,"end":363,"text":"所以這裡面也非常感謝委員的一個支持"},{"start":363,"end":366,"text":"我們也會來跟人總這邊趕快來請他們"},{"start":366,"end":369,"text":"請他們把這個相關的一個人力把它補足"},{"start":369,"end":372,"text":"那至於委員剛剛所槌尋的相關的一些數字"},{"start":372,"end":373,"text":"是不是容許我會後"},{"start":373,"end":377,"text":"我那個趕快提供給委員來進行參佐"},{"start":377,"end":378,"text":"好謝謝"},{"start":378,"end":381,"text":"那今年7月刑法第80條已經修正公佈"},{"start":381,"end":384,"text":"針對特定未成年性侵害被害人"},{"start":384,"end":388,"text":"法律在明定被害人們20歲以前不盡會刑事追溯其傾向"},{"start":388,"end":392,"text":"可是最主要是說這個民法的部分"},{"start":392,"end":394,"text":"沒有必修"},{"start":394,"end":398,"text":"所以想說這個部分是不是也支持就是現行時"},{"start":398,"end":402,"text":"你的客觀期間的限制還是說另外的延長時效"},{"start":402,"end":405,"text":"還是至少比照刑事修法的精神"},{"start":405,"end":408,"text":"在被害人未成年期間不計入"},{"start":408,"end":413,"text":"等到具備一定這種能力才開始計算的民事求償的部分"},{"start":414,"end":416,"text":"OK非常感謝委員"},{"start":416,"end":419,"text":"因為這個可能牽涉到有關民法修正"},{"start":419,"end":422,"text":"這可能牽涉到這個司法機關這邊"},{"start":422,"end":425,"text":"所以就看"},{"start":427,"end":431,"text":"沒關係就是讓你知道說希望以後在修法的時候"},{"start":431,"end":433,"text":"跟刑事跟民事都可以對齊"},{"start":433,"end":437,"text":"跟司法機關這邊法務部這邊我們來一個相關的研商謝謝"},{"start":437,"end":442,"text":"好最後就是我們的資訊斷鏈的部分如何補齊"},{"start":442,"end":447,"text":"這32條之一有在一黨跟執政黨的委員都有提出就是"},{"start":447,"end":452,"text":"認為說不能再讓司法歸司法設政教育歸教育嗎"},{"start":452,"end":455,"text":"然後最後每一個機關手上都是一小塊資訊"},{"start":455,"end":458,"text":"沒有人看到一個完整的風險"},{"start":458,"end":462,"text":"所以本席想請教次長對於偵查中必要取得資訊"},{"start":462,"end":467,"text":"以及取訴後司法資訊主動銜接主管機關這兩件事情"},{"start":467,"end":471,"text":"會不會是不是支持這樣的一個制度化"},{"start":472,"end":476,"text":"其實我們現在目前現行其實都有相關的規定"},{"start":476,"end":481,"text":"這主要是加零暴力及性侵害電子資料庫管理使用辦法第四條"},{"start":481,"end":485,"text":"這裡面其實都裡面有規範到就是我們跟司法院還有法務部那邊"},{"start":485,"end":489,"text":"的一個相關的一個合作的機制"},{"start":489,"end":492,"text":"好謝謝次長就是說希望真的在下一次傷害之前"},{"start":492,"end":495,"text":"先把人接住把漏洞補起來是是是好謝謝"},{"start":495,"end":498,"text":"好非常感謝盧委員的一個的一個槌詢謝謝"},{"start":498,"end":502,"text":"好謝謝盧縣議員發言我們現在休息十分鐘"}],"gazette":[{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:12:01.700000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:12:07.300000+08:00","text":"謝謝主席，有請呂次長。","quality":1},{"speaker":"主席","start":"2026-08-26T11:12:08+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:12:08.750000+08:00","text":"有請呂次長。","quality":0.8},{"speaker":"呂次長建德","start":"2026-08-26T11:12:10+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:12:11+08:00","text":"盧委員好。","quality":0.5},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:12:12+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:12:12+08:00","text":"次長好。","quality":0.333},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:12:13+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:12:37.833333+08:00","text":"我們今天談了很多，不過對於今天的修法，本席是希望能夠留下三件事情：第一是司法、社政、教育之間的資訊不能斷鏈；第二是被害人的權利不能因為他太晚、沒有勇氣說出口，就被時效關在門外；第三是高風險加害人的處遇與社區監督不能有空窗，而第一線也要有足夠的人力跟預算去執行。","quality":0.95},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:12:38.545455+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:13:01.789474+08:00","text":"講到所謂的空窗，我們修這些法律就是看能不能真正的降低風險，所以今天討論的加害人登記、報到、查訪、身心治療、輔導教育及高風險資訊的揭露，看起來像是不同的制度，但其實都是在處理同一件事情，就是社區的監督不能出現空窗，風險也不能在再次發生傷害之後才被看見。","quality":0.982},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:13:02+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:13:09.714286+08:00","text":"所以我想知道次長看見的處遇空窗大概發生在哪兩個類型？","quality":0.84},{"speaker":"呂次長建德","start":"2026-08-26T11:13:10.380952+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:13:22.812500+08:00","text":"這個部分主要第一個就是剛剛說的保護性，另外一個就是特別對於兒少這個領域，我想這都是相關比較容易出現的。","quality":0.958},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:13:23.230769+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:13:33.700000+08:00","text":"處遇空窗我爬梳了一下，大概知道是在易科罰金的部分及被移送偵辦的時候會出現處遇空窗。","quality":0.769},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:13:34.600000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:14:09.733333+08:00","text":"現行法令已經規定有期徒刑如果准予易服社會勞動者，不必等到刑期執行完畢，在准予易服社會勞動時就可以啟動身心治療跟輔導教育等評估處境，可是沒有入監執行的易科罰金，在現行條文中並沒有相同的規定，所以我想說易科罰金跟移送偵辦的時候，是不是他的處遇起點也應該要有這樣的修法方向？","quality":0.732},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:14:10+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:14:14.705882+08:00","text":"你們有沒有同意、支持這個修法方向？","quality":0.867},{"speaker":"呂次長建德","start":"2026-08-26T11:14:15.150000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:14:21.826087+08:00","text":"報告委員，我完全支持，而且剛剛委員所說的這些，基本上送到行政院的版本裡面也已經納入了。OK。","quality":0.878},{"speaker":"呂次長建德","start":"2026-08-26T11:14:22.300000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:14:28.764706+08:00","text":"這個確實是……您剛剛說空窗期的部分，透過這個方式可以有效弭平。","quality":0.741},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:14:29+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:14:41.785714+08:00","text":"好，再來就是有關加害人的資訊揭露，有委員的版本已經採取分級制度，就是不是所有的加害人一律公開，揭露的資訊也不是毫無限制。","quality":0.927},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:14:42+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:14:54.750000+08:00","text":"可是要討論的是，面對經專業評估認定有再犯風險的個案，我們能不能依照比例原則，採取分級、分對象、分區域、分期間的必要通知？","quality":0.981},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:14:55.952381+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:15:09.909091+08:00","text":"第二個，對於評估具有什麼級別以上的再犯風險，經常活動在學校、幼兒園或托育機構附近的個案，是否可以研議向特定學校機構一定範圍內做必要對象的通知？","quality":0.939},{"speaker":"呂次長建德","start":"2026-08-26T11:15:11.285714+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:15:40.333333+08:00","text":"跟委員報告，現在就是兩個問題，第一個就是大家都非常關心性侵害案件的加害人要不要資訊公開，我們剛剛跟黃秀芳委員的答詢中也有提到，因為很多加害人事實上都是熟人，所以會怕的是被害人會不會因為這樣的資訊揭露而被人家按圖索驥，甚至是公審，造成二度傷害，所以這個真的必須要謹慎為之，這是第一點。","quality":0.794},{"speaker":"呂次長建德","start":"2026-08-26T11:15:40.500000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:16:20.777778+08:00","text":"第二點，剛剛委員所說的，有關於風險的分級，其實現行的性侵害防制法裡面就有部分公告，如果認為有再犯之虞的話，我們的法院事實上就可以有強制治療跟社區隔離的作為，如果還有再犯風險，卻沒有按照規定強制治療，甚至有逃亡、藏匿之虞的話，警察機關在這種情況之下，可以公告他的身分資訊，包括他的姓名、照片跟所犯罪名，所以這裡面我們都有整個分級的相關設計。","quality":0.948},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:16:21.352941+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:16:36.750000+08:00","text":"昨天三讀通過了兒少及家庭支持署組織法，在兒童及少年性剝削防制條例第三條明文規定「主管機關應獨立編列預算，並置專職人員辦理兒童及少年性剝削防制業務。","quality":0.638},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:16:37+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:16:44.812500+08:00","text":"」所以本席想請問，衛福部是否掌握了全國22個縣市各自編列多少兒少性剝削的防制預算？","quality":0.889},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:16:45+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:16:49.818182+08:00","text":"有沒有預計會核定多少專職人員、實際到職的有多少？","quality":0.864},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:16:50.461538+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:16:56.833333+08:00","text":"有多少名義上是專職人員，可是實際上還是兼辦家暴、兒保、性侵害及其他社政案件？","quality":0.971},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:16:57.461538+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:17:01.750000+08:00","text":"我想知道目前每名人員平均負擔多少案件？","quality":1},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:17:02+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:17:25.750000+08:00","text":"所以我有一個具體訴求，希望衛福部能夠在一個月內，向本委員會提出22縣市的盤點報告，至少應該包括兒少性剝削的獨立預算、中央補助與地方自籌的經費、核定及實際到職專職人力缺額跟兼辦的情形、平均案量及本次修法新增業務所需要的人力跟經費評估。","quality":0.935},{"speaker":"呂次長建德","start":"2026-08-26T11:17:25.750000+08:00","guessed":true,"end":"2026-08-26T11:17:26.750000+08:00","text":"好，OK。","quality":0},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:17:26.363636+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:17:37.666667+08:00","text":"我希望不要再用全國保護性社工的總人數回答，從第三條第一項所要求的兒少性剝削防制的專職量能，看看怎麼落實。","quality":0.837},{"speaker":"呂次長建德","start":"2026-08-26T11:17:38+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:17:43.800000+08:00","text":"非常感謝委員的關心，完全支持委員，也非常感謝委員對於我們保護性社工的支持。","quality":1},{"speaker":"呂次長建德","start":"2026-08-26T11:17:44.285714+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:17:52.818182+08:00","text":"跟委員報告，牽涉到地方政府有關於性剝削的部分，如果沒有記錯，大概56位，詳細數字我再跟您回報。","quality":1},{"speaker":"呂次長建德","start":"2026-08-26T11:17:53.750000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:18:09.823529+08:00","text":"在這裡面，其實我們也知道，他的caseloading、案件的負擔量其實真的蠻大，所以也非常感謝委員的支持，我們也會趕快請人總把相關人力予以補足。","quality":0.894},{"speaker":"呂次長建德","start":"2026-08-26T11:18:10.166667+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:18:17.466667+08:00","text":"至於委員剛剛所垂詢的相關數字，是不是容許我會後再趕快提供給委員參酌？","quality":0.875},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:18:18+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:18:18.666667+08:00","text":"好，謝謝。","quality":1},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:18:19.214286+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:18:53.782609+08:00","text":"今年7月刑法第八十條已經修正公布，針對特定未成年性侵害案件，法律明定被害人滿二十歲以前不計入刑事追訴權時效期間，可是最主要的是民法在這部分好像沒有一併修正，所以我想請問次長，對於這個部分是不是也支持現行15年的客觀期間限制，還是另外延長時效，至少比照刑法修法的精神，被害人未成年的期間不計入，等到他具備一定自主能力後才開始計算民事求償的部分？","quality":0.759},{"speaker":"呂次長建德","start":"2026-08-26T11:18:55.500000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:19:05.250000+08:00","text":"非常感謝委員，因為民法的修正可能牽涉到司法機關，所以就看……","quality":0.808},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:19:08+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:19:13.818182+08:00","text":"沒關係，就是讓你知道，希望以後修法的時候，刑事跟民事可以對齊。","quality":1},{"speaker":"呂次長建德","start":"2026-08-26T11:19:14+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:19:17.833333+08:00","text":"好，我們再跟司法機關、法務部進行相關研商。謝謝。","quality":0.7},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:19:18.263158+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:19:38.750000+08:00","text":"最後就是資訊斷鏈的部分如何補齊，針對第三十二條之一，在野黨跟執政黨的委員都有提出，認為不能再讓司法歸司法、社政歸社政、教育歸教育，然後最後每一個機關手上都是一小塊資訊，沒有人看到完整的風險。","quality":0.874},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:19:39+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:19:51.750000+08:00","text":"所以本席想請教次長，對於偵查中必要取得資訊，以及起訴後司法資訊主動銜接主管機關這兩件事情，衛福部是不是支持這樣的制度化？","quality":0.929},{"speaker":"呂次長建德","start":"2026-08-26T11:19:53+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:20:09.692308+08:00","text":"報告委員，其實我們現行其實都有相關的規定，這主要是家庭暴力及性侵害電子資料庫管理使用辦法第四條，這裡面其實都有規範到，就是我們跟司法院還有法務部相關的一個合作機制。","quality":0.922},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:20:10+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:20:10.600000+08:00","text":"好，謝謝次長。","quality":1},{"speaker":"盧委員縣一","start":"2026-08-26T11:20:11.200000+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:20:14.764706+08:00","text":"希望真的在下一次傷害之前，先把人接住、把漏洞補起來。","quality":1},{"speaker":"呂次長建德","start":"2026-08-26T11:20:14.941176+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:20:15.823529+08:00","text":"是、是、是。謝謝。","quality":1},{"speaker":"呂次長建德","start":"2026-08-26T11:20:16.166667+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:20:18.833333+08:00","text":"非常感謝盧委員的垂詢，謝謝。","quality":0.917},{"speaker":"主席","start":"2026-08-26T11:20:19.222222+08:00","guessed":false,"end":"2026-08-26T11:20:22.777778+08:00","text":"謝謝盧縣一召委發言，我們現在休息10分鐘。","quality":0.824},{"speaker":"主席","start":"2026-08-26T11:20:23.277778+08:00","guessed":true,"end":"2026-08-26T11:20:24.420635+08:00","text":"休息（11時20分）","quality":0},{"speaker":"主席","start":"2026-08-26T11:20:24.720635+08:00","guessed":true,"end":"2026-08-26T11:20:26.434921+08:00","text":"繼續開會（11時30分）","quality":0},{"speaker":"主席","start":"2026-08-26T11:20:26.734921+08:00","guessed":true,"end":"2026-08-26T11:20:27.877778+08:00","text":"現在開會。","quality":0},{"speaker":"主席","start":"2026-08-26T11:20:28.177778+08:00","guessed":true,"end":"2026-08-26T11:20:33.034921+08:00","text":"張雅琳委員、張雅琳委員、張雅琳委員不在。","quality":0},{"speaker":"主席","start":"2026-08-26T11:20:33.334921+08:00","guessed":true,"end":"2026-08-26T11:20:35.906349+08:00","text":"接著請范雲委員詢答。","quality":0}]},"gazette":{"lineno":1129,"blocks":[["盧委員縣一：（11時12分）謝謝主席，有請呂次長。"],["主席：有請呂次長。"],["呂次長建德：盧委員好。"],["盧委員縣一：次長好。我們今天談了很多，不過對於今天的修法，本席是希望能夠留下三件事情：第一是司法、社政、教育之間的資訊不能斷鏈；第二是被害人的權利不能因為他太晚、沒有勇氣說出口，就被時效關在門外；第三是高風險加害人的處遇與社區監督不能有空窗，而第一線也要有足夠的人力跟預算去執行。講到所謂的空窗，我們修這些法律就是看能不能真正的降低風險，所以今天討論的加害人登記、報到、查訪、身心治療、輔導教育及高風險資訊的揭露，看起來像是不同的制度，但其實都是在處理同一件事情，就是社區的監督不能出現空窗，風險也不能在再次發生傷害之後才被看見。所以我想知道次長看見的處遇空窗大概發生在哪兩個類型？"],["呂次長建德：這個部分主要第一個就是剛剛說的保護性，另外一個就是特別對於兒少這個領域，我想這都是相關比較容易出現的。"],["盧委員縣一：處遇空窗我爬梳了一下，大概知道是在易科罰金的部分及被移送偵辦的時候會出現處遇空窗。現行法令已經規定有期徒刑如果准予易服社會勞動者，不必等到刑期執行完畢，在准予易服社會勞動時就可以啟動身心治療跟輔導教育等評估處境，可是沒有入監執行的易科罰金，在現行條文中並沒有相同的規定，所以我想說易科罰金跟移送偵辦的時候，是不是他的處遇起點也應該要有這樣的修法方向？你們有沒有同意、支持這個修法方向？"],["呂次長建德：報告委員，我完全支持，而且剛剛委員所說的這些，基本上送到行政院的版本裡面也已經納入了。"],["盧委員縣一：OK。"],["呂次長建德：這個確實是……您剛剛說空窗期的部分，透過這個方式可以有效弭平。"],["盧委員縣一：好，再來就是有關加害人的資訊揭露，有委員的版本已經採取分級制度，就是不是所有的加害人一律公開，揭露的資訊也不是毫無限制。可是要討論的是，面對經專業評估認定有再犯風險的個案，我們能不能依照比例原則，採取分級、分對象、分區域、分期間的必要通知？第二個，對於評估具有什麼級別以上的再犯風險，經常活動在學校、幼兒園或托育機構附近的個案，是否可以研議向特定學校機構一定範圍內做必要對象的通知？"],["呂次長建德：跟委員報告，現在就是兩個問題，第一個就是大家都非常關心性侵害案件的加害人要不要資訊公開，我們剛剛跟黃秀芳委員的答詢中也有提到，因為很多加害人事實上都是熟人，所以會怕的是被害人會不會因為這樣的資訊揭露而被人家按圖索驥，甚至是公審，造成二度傷害，所以這個真的必須要謹慎為之，這是第一點。","第二點，剛剛委員所說的，有關於風險的分級，其實現行的性侵害防制法裡面就有部分公告，如果認為有再犯之虞的話，我們的法院事實上就可以有強制治療跟社區隔離的作為，如果還有再犯風險，卻沒有按照規定強制治療，甚至有逃亡、藏匿之虞的話，警察機關在這種情況之下，可以公告他的身分資訊，包括他的姓名、照片跟所犯罪名，所以這裡面我們都有整個分級的相關設計。"],["盧委員縣一：昨天三讀通過了兒少及家庭支持署組織法，在兒童及少年性剝削防制條例第三條明文規定「主管機關應獨立編列預算，並置專職人員辦理兒童及少年性剝削防制業務。」所以本席想請問，衛福部是否掌握了全國22個縣市各自編列多少兒少性剝削的防制預算？有沒有預計會核定多少專職人員、實際到職的有多少？有多少名義上是專職人員，可是實際上還是兼辦家暴、兒保、性侵害及其他社政案件？我想知道目前每名人員平均負擔多少案件？所以我有一個具體訴求，希望衛福部能夠在一個月內，向本委員會提出22縣市的盤點報告，至少應該包括兒少性剝削的獨立預算、中央補助與地方自籌的經費、核定及實際到職專職人力缺額跟兼辦的情形、平均案量及本次修法新增業務所需要的人力跟經費評估。"],["呂次長建德：好，OK。"],["盧委員縣一：我希望不要再用全國保護性社工的總人數回答，從第三條第一項所要求的兒少性剝削防制的專職量能，看看怎麼落實。"],["呂次長建德：非常感謝委員的關心，完全支持委員，也非常感謝委員對於我們保護性社工的支持。跟委員報告，牽涉到地方政府有關於性剝削的部分，如果沒有記錯，大概56位，詳細數字我再跟您回報。在這裡面，其實我們也知道，他的caseloading、案件的負擔量其實真的蠻大，所以也非常感謝委員的支持，我們也會趕快請人總把相關人力予以補足。至於委員剛剛所垂詢的相關數字，是不是容許我會後再趕快提供給委員參酌？"],["盧委員縣一：好，謝謝。今年7月刑法第八十條已經修正公布，針對特定未成年性侵害案件，法律明定被害人滿二十歲以前不計入刑事追訴權時效期間，可是最主要的是民法在這部分好像沒有一併修正，所以我想請問次長，對於這個部分是不是也支持現行15年的客觀期間限制，還是另外延長時效，至少比照刑法修法的精神，被害人未成年的期間不計入，等到他具備一定自主能力後才開始計算民事求償的部分？"],["呂次長建德：非常感謝委員，因為民法的修正可能牽涉到司法機關，所以就看……"],["盧委員縣一：沒關係，就是讓你知道，希望以後修法的時候，刑事跟民事可以對齊。"],["呂次長建德：好，我們再跟司法機關、法務部進行相關研商。謝謝。"],["盧委員縣一：最後就是資訊斷鏈的部分如何補齊，針對第三十二條之一，在野黨跟執政黨的委員都有提出，認為不能再讓司法歸司法、社政歸社政、教育歸教育，然後最後每一個機關手上都是一小塊資訊，沒有人看到完整的風險。所以本席想請教次長，對於偵查中必要取得資訊，以及起訴後司法資訊主動銜接主管機關這兩件事情，衛福部是不是支持這樣的制度化？"],["呂次長建德：報告委員，其實我們現行其實都有相關的規定，這主要是家庭暴力及性侵害電子資料庫管理使用辦法第四條，這裡面其實都有規範到，就是我們跟司法院還有法務部相關的一個合作機制。"],["盧委員縣一：好，謝謝次長。希望真的在下一次傷害之前，先把人接住、把漏洞補起來。"],["呂次長建德：是、是、是。"],["盧委員縣一：謝謝。"],["呂次長建德：非常感謝盧委員的垂詢，謝謝。"],["主席：謝謝盧縣一召委發言，我們現在休息10分鐘。","休息（11時20分）","繼續開會（11時30分）"],["主席：現在開會。","張雅琳委員、張雅琳委員、張雅琳委員不在。","接著請范雲委員詢答。"]],"agenda":{"agendarec_url":null,"pdf_url":"https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/SittingCommitteesInfo/download/communique1/final/pdf/115/76/LCIDC01_1157601_00003.pdf","meet_name":"立法院第11屆第5會期社會福利及衛生環境、司法及法制委員會第2次聯席會議紀錄","content":"一、審查「性侵害犯罪防治法部分條文修正草案」等10案：(一)委員葉元之等19人擬具「性侵害\n犯罪防治法第五十二條條文修正草案」案、(二)委員黃健豪等23人擬具「性侵害犯罪防治法部分\n條文修正草案」案、(三)委員徐巧芯等16人擬具「性侵害犯罪防治法增訂第三十二條之一條文草\n案」案、( 四) 委員鄭正鈐等22 人擬具「性侵害犯罪防治法增訂第二十八條之一條文草案」案、\n(五)委員吳沛憶等17人擬具「性侵害犯罪防治法增訂第十條之一條文草案」案、(六)委員魯明哲\n等18 人擬具「性侵害犯罪防治法增訂第十一條之一條文草案」案、( 七) 委員魯明哲等18 人擬具\n「性侵害犯罪防治法第二十九條條文修正草案」案、(八)委員陳培瑜等16人擬具「性侵害犯罪防\n治法部分條文修正草案」案、(九)委員王育敏等20人擬具「性侵害犯罪防治法第二十九條及第四\n十三條之一條文修正草案」案、(十)委員張雅琳等16人擬具「性侵害犯罪防治法部分條文修正草\n案」案；二、審查「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例部分條文修正草案」等17案：(一)委員陳亭妃等\n17人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例部分條文修正草案」案、(二)委員徐欣瑩等27人擬具「兒\n童及少年性剝削防制條例第三十二條及第三十三條條文修正草案」案、(三)委員張智倫等18人擬\n具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例部分條文修正草案」案、(四)委員廖先翔等17人擬具「兒童及少\n年性剝削防制條例第三十九條條文修正草案」案、(五)委員蔡其昌等17人擬具「兒童及少年性剝\n削防制條例增訂第五十三條之二條文草案」案、(六)委員黃秀芳等18人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削\n防制條例增訂第五十三條之二條文草案」案、(七)委員羅廷瑋等18人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防\n制條例第十二條、第五十三條之二及第五十五條條文修正草案」案、(八)委員林宜瑾等19人擬具\n「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例增訂第五十三條之二條文草案」案、 ( 九) 委員林俊憲等18 人擬具\n「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例增訂第五十三條之二條文草案」案、( 十) 委員邱議瑩等16 人擬具\n「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例增訂第五十三條之二條文草案」案、(十一)委員林月琴等21人擬具\n「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例增訂第十三條之一及第五十三條之二條文草案」案、(十二)委員王\n育敏等19人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例第十二條、第五十三條之二及第五十五條條文修正\n草案」案、(十三)委員范雲等16人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例增訂第五十三條之二及第五\n十三條之三條文草案」案、(十四)委員陳培瑜等16人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例部分條文\n修正草案」案、(十五)委員翁曉玲等18人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例第十二條及第五十三\n條之二條文修正草案」案、(十六)委員林月琴等16人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例部分條文\n修正草案」案、(十七)委員張雅琳等16人擬具「兒童及少年性剝削防制條例部分條文修正草案」\n案（詢答）","agenda_id":"1157601_00003","doc_url":"https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/download/communique1\\work\\115\\76\\LCIDC01_1157601_00004.doc","page_end":288,"meet_id":"聯席會議-11-5-26,36-2","speakers":["林月琴","張智倫","陳昭姿","陳菁徽","邱鎮軍","廖偉翔","黃秀芳","莊瑞雄","盧縣一","范雲","楊瓊瓔","邱慧洳","王正旭","陳瑩","劉建國","涂權吉","沈發惠","蘇清泉","傅崐萁","王育敏","蔡其昌","楊曜","林淑芬","徐欣瑩","許宇甄","吳宗憲","沈伯洋","張雅琳"],"page_start":173,"meetingDate":["2026-08-26"],"gazette_id":"1157601","agenda_lcidc_ids":["1157601_00004"],"pdf_page_offset":172}}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}