{"error":false,"id":["171934"],"data":{"IVOD_ID":171934,"IVOD_URL":"https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/171934","日期":"2026-11-06","會議資料":{"會議代碼":"院會-11-6-6","會議代碼:str":"第11屆第6會期第6次會議","屆":11,"會期":6,"會次":6,"臨時會會次":null,"種類":"院會","標題":"第11屆第6會期第6次會議"},"影片種類":"Clip","開始時間":"2026-11-06T15:13:22+08:00","結束時間":"2026-11-06T15:16:35+08:00","影片長度":"00:03:13","支援功能":["ai-transcript"],"video_url":"https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/2edf89a78d11c00e84d20bdcee21216dd1dcaf7f9678d6041dd169657a42087d7c45cb4d80bcee6c5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8","委員名稱":"洪毓祥","委員發言時間":"15:13:22 - 15:16:35","會議時間":"2026-11-06T09:00:00+08:00","會議名稱":"第11屆第6會期第6次會議（事由：一、對行政院院長施政報告繼續質詢。二、11月6日上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。三、11月10日下午2時15分至2時30分為處理臨時提案時間。）","transcript":{"pyannote":[{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"洪委員毓祥","start":6.00471875,"end":9.818468750000001,"speaker_score":0.856},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"洪委員毓祥","start":10.240343750000001,"end":20.972843750000003,"speaker_score":0.856},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"洪委員毓祥","start":21.02346875,"end":43.70346875,"speaker_score":0.856},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"洪委員毓祥","start":44.040968750000005,"end":70.80471875,"speaker_score":0.856},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"洪委員毓祥","start":71.22659375,"end":84.62534375,"speaker_score":0.856},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"洪委員毓祥","start":85.06409375000001,"end":86.04284375,"speaker_score":0.856},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"洪委員毓祥","start":86.39721875000001,"end":110.98409375000001,"speaker_score":0.856},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"洪委員毓祥","start":111.37221875,"end":115.45596875000001,"speaker_score":0.856},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"洪委員毓祥","start":116.43471875,"end":190.54971875,"speaker_score":0.856},{"speaker":"SPEAKER_00","speaker_name":"洪委員毓祥","start":191.19096875000002,"end":193.67159375,"speaker_score":0.856}],"whisperx":[{"start":0,"end":9.3,"text":"好 院長還有各位我們立法院的同仁"},{"start":9.3,"end":9.9,"text":"大家好"},{"start":9.9,"end":14.9,"text":"我想我們整個民眾黨在這一次提出的修正草案"},{"start":14.9,"end":18.5,"text":"絕對不是像民進黨 陳培宇委員所說的"},{"start":18.5,"end":20.7,"text":"這個是沒有經過計算"},{"start":20.7,"end":26.900000000000002,"text":"主要的話 我們是根據這個主計處的高齡家庭的消費者的物價指數"},{"start":27.099999999999998,"end":30.599999999999998,"text":"另外有包含我們整個通膨的因素"},{"start":30.599999999999998,"end":33.9,"text":"臺灣的財政獲利的情況"},{"start":33.9,"end":38.4,"text":"以及我們整個財務紀律的結構"},{"start":38.4,"end":40.9,"text":"把這些弄成一個柿子來計算"},{"start":40.9,"end":44.099999999999994,"text":"來提高老農津貼到金額"},{"start":44.099999999999994,"end":46.099999999999994,"text":"主要是因為我們高齡者"},{"start":46.099999999999994,"end":48.099999999999994,"text":"他的消費結構"},{"start":48.099999999999994,"end":50.599999999999994,"text":"跟我們一般的家庭不同"},{"start":50.599999999999994,"end":53.5,"text":"食物 醫療 保健跟居住"},{"start":53.5,"end":55.599999999999994,"text":"對於生活的影響"},{"start":55.7,"end":58.2,"text":"那按照主計處的統計"},{"start":58.2,"end":61.5,"text":"我們這個高齡家庭的CPI的年增率"},{"start":61.5,"end":63.300000000000004,"text":"是1.74%"},{"start":63.300000000000004,"end":66.3,"text":"高於整體家庭的1.6%"},{"start":66.3,"end":68.4,"text":"而且已經連續的7年"},{"start":68.4,"end":71.3,"text":"高於全體家庭的標準"},{"start":71.3,"end":74.5,"text":"所以高齡者的消費結構不同"},{"start":74.5,"end":79.9,"text":"所以如何讓這樣子的一個老農津貼的狀況"},{"start":79.9,"end":83.3,"text":"來反映出我們現在的結構"},{"start":83.3,"end":85.1,"text":"所以有必要的提高"},{"start":85.1,"end":86.1,"text":"第二點"},{"start":86.1,"end":88.6,"text":"老農津貼已經被行政院列入"},{"start":88.6,"end":90.6,"text":"115年的追加預算"},{"start":90.6,"end":93.6,"text":"但是我們這樣子的法院的給付"},{"start":93.6,"end":96.1,"text":"目前缺乏法源的依據"},{"start":96.1,"end":98.6,"text":"所以我們在審查預算"},{"start":98.6,"end":100.6,"text":"如果沒有法源的依據"},{"start":100.6,"end":103.1,"text":"那我們怎麼樣來通過這個預算"},{"start":103.1,"end":106.6,"text":"同時對於預算的合理性來進行審查"},{"start":106.6,"end":109.1,"text":"所以我們有加速這樣子的一個"},{"start":109.1,"end":111.1,"text":"通過法源的一個必要"},{"start":111.1,"end":114.1,"text":"第三點 根據農業部的統計"},{"start":114.1,"end":117.1,"text":"我們一般的這樣子"},{"start":117.1,"end":119.1,"text":"農家的平均每戶所得"},{"start":119.1,"end":121.1,"text":"雖然達到128.5萬"},{"start":121.1,"end":125.1,"text":"但真正來自於農業本身的所得"},{"start":125.1,"end":127.1,"text":"僅有28.2萬"},{"start":127.1,"end":129.6,"text":"占了21.9%"},{"start":129.6,"end":133.1,"text":"即使是以農業經營為主力的主力農家"},{"start":133.1,"end":137.1,"text":"農業的所得的占比也只有32%"},{"start":137.1,"end":138.6,"text":"這代表一件事"},{"start":138.6,"end":141.1,"text":"農家所得好像有增加"},{"start":141.1,"end":143.1,"text":"但並不是代表農民"},{"start":143.1,"end":145.1,"text":"農民是依靠這個農業本業"},{"start":145.1,"end":147.1,"text":"能獲得足夠的收入"},{"start":147.1,"end":150.1,"text":"大多是仰賴兼職的收入及政府各項補貼"},{"start":150.1,"end":153.1,"text":"農民年輕還可以兼職的工作"},{"start":153.1,"end":155.1,"text":"但隨著年齡的增長"},{"start":155.1,"end":157.1,"text":"他勞動能力下降"},{"start":157.1,"end":159.1,"text":"退休以後的經濟的保障"},{"start":159.1,"end":161.1,"text":"就更加的一個重要"},{"start":161.1,"end":162.1,"text":"那麼第四點"},{"start":162.1,"end":164.1,"text":"除了我們民眾黨團跟國民黨團"},{"start":164.1,"end":167.1,"text":"提出每月15000塊的腦容津貼"},{"start":167.1,"end":169.1,"text":"包含民進黨籍的武力華文"},{"start":169.1,"end":171.1,"text":"許富奎、邱志偉等委員的提案"},{"start":171.1,"end":175.1,"text":"陳婷飛、王美惠、賴樂榮、許志杰、林俊憲等十多個立委的連署"},{"start":175.1,"end":178.1,"text":"那麼也是同樣是15000"},{"start":178.1,"end":180.1,"text":"顯現大家有相同的共識"},{"start":180.1,"end":182.1,"text":"那麼最後我們希望"},{"start":182.1,"end":184.1,"text":"不管我們通過哪一個版本"},{"start":184.1,"end":187.1,"text":"都請行政院不要這樣附屬"},{"start":187.1,"end":188.1,"text":"來欺壓農民"},{"start":188.1,"end":190.1,"text":"還給首領土地的老農一點尊嚴"},{"start":190.1,"end":193.1,"text":"好,謝謝洪育祥委的發言"}]}},"supported_relations":[],"relations":[]}